Rumor: The All Encompassing Trevor Zegras Thread

What would you give up to get Zegras?

  • Habs 24 1st (Top 5 protected)

    Votes: 10 3.7%
  • Habs 25 1st (Top 5 protected)

    Votes: 9 3.3%
  • WPG 24 1st OR Cal 25 1st + forward and defense prospect (e.g. Mesar & Barron)

    Votes: 99 36.5%
  • WPG 24 1st AND Cal 25 1st + forward and defense prospect (e.g. Mesar & Barron)

    Votes: 34 12.5%
  • Habs 24 1st (Top 5 protected) AND WPG 24 1st AND Cal 25 1st

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • Some other combination of 1st round picks and prospects

    Votes: 31 11.4%
  • Nothing - Zegras has too many red flags and will kill the culture

    Votes: 87 32.1%

  • Total voters
    271

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,012
45,160
You're better than this.
Exactly, you have nothing to say. I get being afraid of it turning out like Drouin, but they are not the same player just because they are skilled.

If the Habs, with their terrible offence, have a shot at getting a young player with this much skill and promise, they need to take a chance. They have the coach in place that seems to have a knack at developing forwards. They have an abundance of defenders and picks. Plus the added bonus of having his best friend to better acclimate him.
 

MXD

Partying Hard
Oct 27, 2005
51,722
17,625
Exactly, you have nothing to say.

Because your post wasn't worth my time.
But, hey, if you give it a go again, this time while considering the whole picture and not penalize a player for actually accomplishing something, it may be.
 

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
21,231
28,197
I would trade the habs 1st round pick if Celebrini/Eiserman/Lindstrom/Demidov are not there when the habs pick
 

TheBuriedHab

Registered User
Jan 27, 2010
8,386
4,354
Seems doubtful that we would do that or that another team is offering an equivalent pick/prospect.
Really? I get the vibe that they aren't too crazy about drafting 6th-10th and waiting 2-3 years for that prospect to have meaningful impact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pat Riot

teamfirst

Registered User
Oct 28, 2016
3,878
2,550
The way our prospect pool is shaped it would be logical to trade one of our young promising D for a young promising F, of course it all depends on the cost
 

Adam Michaels

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
78,835
129,396
Montreal
He's produced... to a clip no better than what we have now... despite being spoonfed ridiculously easy minutes WITH, comparatively speaking, good teammates.

So what if he produced at a clip no better to what we have now? The whole point here is to add to what we have now. The Canadiens need more offense.

You're minimizing his game. You're stuck with these O-zone starts and now you say he played with good teammates. Let me ask you, those good teammates, they didn't benefit playing with Zegras? He only benefitted from them and not the other way around?
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,012
45,160
Because your post wasn't worth my time.
But, hey, if you give it a go again, this time while considering the whole picture and not penalize a player for actually accomplishing something, it may be.
Another way of saying “yeah you were right and I have nothing to say to that”

Your only argument is “spoonfed minutes” (ie has no one to play with) and “takes penalties”

Funny how we don’t say spoonfed minutes about Suzuki who plays 3-4 more minutes per game. Or Cole who plays similar minutes and almost the full 2 mins on each PP.
 

MXD

Partying Hard
Oct 27, 2005
51,722
17,625
Caufield is not getting hard minutes either
They're comparatively easier (Zegras' minutes)

Besides, we've already used assets on Caufield, and I'd rather have one player that have to be sheltered than two.
 

MXD

Partying Hard
Oct 27, 2005
51,722
17,625
Caufield is not getting hard minutes either
They're comparatively harder than Zegras.

Also, that's something of a good argument for NOT getting Zegras regardless. We have one player that's probably best sheltered (though Caufield isn't a PIM magnet), let's not add one more.

In a recent players poll he was voted most overrated player.
I mean, one way to not overrate a player is to use brain when rating him.

So what if he produced at a clip no better to what we have now? The whole point here is to add to what we have now. The Canadiens need more offense.

You're minimizing his game. You're stuck with these O-zone starts and now you say he played with good teammates. Let me ask you, those good teammates, they didn't benefit playing with Zegras? He only benefitted from them and not the other way around?
I'd absolutely trade for Troy Terry and Mason McTavish. Not Zegras. I mean, yes I'd trade for him, just not for the assets Verbeek could fetch for him. There is a reason why it's him, and not Terry or McTavish, that's apparently available.

And even then, Terry doesn't quite have ideal size
 
Last edited:

HabsForHire

"Expect the unexpected"
Sep 21, 2011
3,585
3,667
CT
I don’t see this actually happening, but it would be a pleasant surprise if it did. We’ve already seen his offensive capabilities, but maybe MSL can unlock something greater.

One thing is for sure, we haven’t had an exciting forward since Kovalev. I’d love to see the Bell Centre reaction if Zegras pulls a Michigan.
I'd say it's more likely to happen than not..makes too much sense
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,012
45,160
So what if he produced at a clip no better to what we have now? The whole point here is to add to what we have now. The Canadiens need more offense.

You're minimizing his game. You're stuck with these O-zone starts and now you say he played with good teammates. Let me ask you, those good teammates, they didn't benefit playing with Zegras? He only benefitted from them and not the other way around?
He only produces because he’s given minutes and offensive zone starts. Yeah great, we have an entire team that can’t produce when given minutes and offensive zone starts.
 

Sorinth

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
11,597
6,240
Really? I get the vibe that they aren't too crazy about drafting 6th-10th and waiting 2-3 years for that prospect to have meaningful impact.
They no doubt would like to add a young NHLer but I don't think they are looking to deal our first round pick to do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leto

Goalfield13

In Bilbo We Trust
Aug 31, 2021
2,023
2,736
People keep pointing to the player poll that says this player is overrated... and that may be true, but he is getting massively underrated now.

Looking at the Anaheim boards, it looks like their rebuild is going through a reset. That org is a mess. They may see Zegras as a player that doesn't fit their vision that they can afford to trade, but they won't do it for peanuts.

I think it would be a mistake for them to trade him. I also think it would be a mistake for us not to try to get him with our plethora of picks and prospects. Who in the 5-10 range of this draft do you think will honestly be better than him?
 

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
17,541
11,952
He's produced... to a clip no better than what we have now... despite being spoonfed ridiculously easy minutes WITH, comparatively speaking, good teammates.

And it's not that Zegras is bad or anything. If he were to cost a 2nd rounder, then of course I'd have no issue with the move.

But it seems very obvious this team needs more size on F. Zegras does nothing to this, and we'd end up giving a lot for a player who would be a 2nd liner and who comes with huge risks (way, way, way too much penalties for a guy who sheltered)

Then again, I really don't care about flashy things.
Zegras has played on a team with crap players his entire NHL tenure. He has first line minutes like Suzuki and outside of Terry garbage to mediocre forwards. Very similar situation to Suzuki and both have produced at a 60 pt clip. 2nd line is irrelevant. With Dach and Nehook on the line it would be a 1a and 1b situation. Adding size would be nice but they might able to do that at the draft or through UFA. Dubois has size but I doubt he plays any bigger than Zegras. Of course Zegras would only be of interest if the price was right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs10Habs

dcyhabs

Registered User
May 30, 2008
4,456
2,678
Montreal
On the one hand this thread probably overvalues some of the upcoming prospects. Top 10 upcoming picks always look better than existing players.

On the other hand it looks like the Ducks have been planning to shop Zegras long term. They gave him lots of ice time and offensive starts. He scored pretty well, but he has the worst +/- on the team in spite of starting in the other team's zone. I understand the issues with +/- but in this case it points to weak D.

I suspect there is a similarity with Drouin, where bridges were burnt with the team and he was given offensive minutes to pump his value for trade. Smart teams will showcase a player as opposed to our previous regime when a coach would be allowed to refuse to play someone and make it clear that the GM had to take whatever he was offered to get the guy out.

I'm not totally against picking up Zegras, but he seems to be exactly what the team doesn't need. I expect Hughes will do a much better job than I can of figuring how Zegras would do with the habs in a different role, but I'd expect to get less offense and better D. His age would fit the rebuild, but I'm not sure we need another smallish lowish D forward. TSN and some of the more clueless pundits seem to think he should go to Montreal, good thing Bergevin isn't around to offer whatever they want.

Scouting reports show "elite two way forward" so maybe my interpretation is way off. I expect that there will be a bidding war, we'll see what the Ducks want.

And he's out for 6-8 weeks.
 

MXD

Partying Hard
Oct 27, 2005
51,722
17,625
And yet he has one how many Cups on a team where he was easily the most important forward.
... I think either you completely misunderstood my post OR I completely missed your sarcasm.

a top 10 winger in the league for 5-7 years is overrated? come on
...Oh geez...
Zegras is being overrated when compared to Kane, NOT Kane is overrated!!!!
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad