Do you read before you post?!?!? What you’re saying goes against everything the law in western countries is. If you believe that Due process is the same as defending the alleged actions the defendant then you’re not only terribly misinformed but you have a dangerous perspective on justice like national socialism or the inquisition had: due process and Facts don’t matter, the agenda matters. If that’s you then there’s no point in discussing further.
No need to be defensive. I assume you don’t have anything to do with the law or investigations in your line of work, right? I do. And you wouldn’t believe how clear as day things sometimes seem and then you realize that’s not the entire puzzle.
Punish an entire franchise for the actions of some employees? Extremely unlikely. Those involved are no longer employed, a fitting punishment.
I usually don’t attribute motives in discussions. But i think this is the sticking point! We all have Kyle Beach and maybe other cases fresh in our minds. Then this case surfaces and I believe some people (and I understand it to a certain extent) think: “NOW! Now we can right the wrongs of the past in this case.” maybe that’s somewhat human. But super dangerous. Justice is about specifics and not shortcomings of a culture that can be rectified and purged by assuming guilt from the start.
When your paychecks stop coming in, do you think you care what the press release said to describe why that is?
you're doing a bad job. that's the part i want you to understand.
That’s the problem. You seem to have a warped understanding of justice and how to come to conclusions. Following your logic: When an alleged victim is being questioned by a judge or a D.A. that’d be undermining. Pretty bad. Being that defensive doesn’t help your case either. Please leave it to the unemotional pros how to proceed.
the judge isn't undermining the victim, you are. the bolded below is specifically what i've been referring to the entire time. a "professional" such as yourself wouldn't float a bad faith thought experiment and call it impartiality. you even make assumptions, while blaming others for jumping to conclusions. you are the pot calling the kettle black and haven't shown a lick of integrity in this exchange. again, your inability to wait is proving you have already made your judgements and you think we need to discount the victim's story while holding ample space for this to not be true. that's not impartiality, it's the opposite, and that's not hard to discern.
Yes. Many people believe in the conventional definitions of justice and fairness.
Edmonton already bought that with their new LRT line
Originally my thoughts were they didn’t tender him assuming some consequences from this.
Too much risk if you screw up.
And Bob Nicholson shouldn't get a pass for being the head of Hockey Canada and likely involved in the cover up. But we know he'll somehow get off scott free. Makes my blood boil how this is taking so long and these a-holes have still been making millions.
