cowboy82nd
Registered User
Isn't the first step the release of police charges before the league report?
You don't need to be charged by the police for the league to enforce their own policies.
Isn't the first step the release of police charges before the league report?
I may not know that detail. Do we know they made her take a shower? Honest question. If not then you’re jumping to conclusions. Some women like a shower after intercourse. I think a lot of men in here know that. And I am pretty sure that if someone close to you was accused of a disgusting crime like that you wouldn’t for one second accept “the girl took a shower after” as any way of determining guilt. If they are guilty of rape then ban them for years or for life.Mmm, as a woman, I know I sure love reading threads of posts from old white dudes (and I know that's what most people on this forum are) saying actually rape isn't a crime and those boys didn't mean it. I had to give up after page eight.
I agree with this comment SO much, especially the edit. The most damning thing, even if it isn't specifically criminal, is the fact they realized "oh, shit, we might have done something bad here" and not only had her record that video but they MADE HER SHOWER AWAY ANY EVIDENCE.
I don't care if the perpetrators never see legal criminal justice. As a woman, I am fully aware convictions for rape are vanishingly rare. I don't need to see them tarred and feathered and strung up on pikes. But getting to play in the NHL is a privilege you earn and which can (and should) be denied you for character reasons just as much as a lack of skill on a sheet of ice. Participating in a gang rape of a woman intoxicated to the point of semi-consiousness, especially if you are unwise enough to participate in such an act on camera, should absolutely be just cause to never get to play another minute of NHL hockey. There are hundreds and thousands of other men who deserve that roster spot who didn't rape someone and get caught.
Some of you need to really search your souls if you think otherwise.
Don't underestimate the NHL (and hockey in general). Being stuck in old ways and not using any logic whatsoever is right up their alley, lol.They can’t be both suspended and not named.
I’m not re-traumatizing myself by looking up every piece of media that has been released about this case. I do not owe you that. I invite you to educate yourself on the matter. Google is free, and the details are stomach-turning. But after all, we have to make sure we know all the facts before we deny these boys what are apparently their god-given rights to an NHL roster spot. Imploring everyone to stay extremely neutral over a rape no one disagrees happened is as bad as the freaks here loudly declaring that the woke mob wants to cancel these kids forever.I may not know that detail. Do we know they made her take a shower? Honest question. If not then you’re jumping to conclusions. Some women like a shower after intercourse. I think a lot of men in here know that. And I am pretty sure that if someone close to you was accused of a disgusting crime like that you wouldn’t for one second accept “the girl took a shower after” as any way of determining guilt. If they are guilty of rape then ban them for years or for life.
I think if those were our sons coming into the hotel room we would want them to call a cab and take the lady home safely or call an ambulance if she’s too intoxicated. Didn’t happen - bad judgement. But the absolute conviction of some folks that we are dealing with gang rapists here although nobody knows anything is astonishing. I remember Duke lacrosse. Let’s see it play out before we’re baying for blood.
I think if those were our sons coming into the hotel room we would want them to call a cab and take the lady home safely or call an ambulance if she’s too intoxicated. Didn’t happen - bad judgement. But the absolute conviction of some folks that we are dealing with gang rapists here although nobody knows anything is astonishing. I remember Duke lacrosse. Let’s see it play out before we’re baying for blood.
what a shit sandwich you put out hereI may not know that detail. Do we know they made her take a shower? Honest question. If not then you’re jumping to conclusions. Some women like a shower after intercourse. I think a lot of men in here know that. And I am pretty sure that if someone close to you was accused of a disgusting crime like that you wouldn’t for one second accept “the girl took a shower after” as any way of determining guilt. If they are guilty of rape then ban them for years or for life.
You say all of this while being oblivious to how clearly biased in favour of accused persons in cases of sexual assault, and demonstrating a complete lack of understanding of how things actually work. Bravo.If we are going to run our justice system around the personal and (understandably) highly biased feelings of alleged victims families we are in trouble.
In fact we are already there. What do you say to the MANY wrongly convicted black men who did additional time for rape and murder because of the victim impact statement of parents?
Justice should be dispassionate.
I think people know because you all sound the same on the internet and have the same concern whenever these topics come up (and you're posting on a website that skews older, in a sport that skews toward that demographic, especially in older demographics); get outraged when anyone makes fun of white men, while either thinking making fun of other races or cultures or simply people you disagree with ideologically is funny/joking (and whine that everyone else is just too dang sensitive, but not you) or are ambivalent about it at best.Pray tell.....how do you know everyone commenting here is old white guys? I am guessing most of the people here are young and what does the color of their skin matter??? I bet you wouldn't say that about other colors!!!
I think people know because you all sound the same on the internet and have the same concern whenever these topics come up (and you're posting on a website that skews older, in a sport that skews toward that demographic, especially in older demographics); get outraged when anyone makes fun of white men, while either thinking making fun of other races or cultures or simply people you disagree with ideologically is funny/joking (and whine that everyone else is just too dang sensitive, but not you) or are ambivalent about it at best.
Cole already broke up an engagement. Not the hill to die on.
Did you see the way they looked at that girl?!Expecting 20 pages of:
Hang them all! Bankrupt their families! Ensure a treacherous life for the next three generations!
Feel free to reference Article 18-A and 18.19 of the CBA, as well as exhibit 1 - the Standard Player Contract, specifically paragraph 2(e).
"If NHL names and suspends players allegedly involved, affected players would likely appeal any sanctions to an arbitrator, as per CBA, and may pursue defamation lawsuits vs league, said agent of one player who attended 2018 Hockey Canada gala."
View attachment 728585
Will have to be provincial labour authorities and perhaps federal involvement. The monopoly over minor and junior hockey needs to be broken up.There are so many rumors and whispers that even if some of them are unfounded, there is enough to think there is truth to the perceived culture. I’d imagine it is deeply ingrained and I’m not sure how effective oversight would be because I’m sure many of these coaches and higher ups try to be buddy with the kids or “protect” them or look the other way
How you can be so certain of what happened and cry wolf when the public information is that limited is peculiar.what a shit sandwich you put out here
if this was an honest question, you would've stopped typing after that. the answer would've mattered.
don't pretend to play both sides if you're clearly on one side
Amazing there are actual people who feel the same way @Silky Johnson does. Hockey culture needs a clean up badly.
I know what you're saying about the extremities, but suing over bans for this stuff is an admission of guilt IMO.If the NHL was serious about hockey culture, they really should have started with cleaning up their own house, starting with the Chicago Blackhawks.
How does a team that hid systematic sexual abuse get to draft the top prospect in hockey within a couple years of the allegations?
It's pathetic.
I know what you're saying about the extremities, but suing over bans for this stuff is an admission of guilt IMO.
His bias is clear as day.I read it loud and clear. You went after the wannabe lawyers and how people don’t care about the due process.
It’s targeted to one group. Maybe you should re read what you wrote.
Do you mean the Krakauer book? Haven’t read it m, just heard of it. But I think that’s besides the point. We agree that every case should be taken seriously and investigated. Bury the perpetrators and enablers under the prison. Call out the people who shame the alleged victim, make it safer for them to come forward. What no one needs is a bunch of keyboard Roy Beans calling for frontier justice when emotions run the day and nobody knows what actually happened. Good that those folks aren’t in charge. A f***in nightmare and fascistoid beyond belief. That’s Roland Freisler-esque.You should read up on Missoula. Or any other college place where rapes happened on the norm but nothing was done.
Do you mean the Krakauer book? Haven’t read it m, just heard of it. But I think that’s besides the point. We agree that every case should be taken seriously and investigated. Bury the perpetrators and enablers under the prison. Call out the people who shame the alleged victim, make it safer for them to come forward. What no one needs is a bunch of keyboard Roy Beans calling for frontier justice when emotions run the day and nobody knows what actually happened. Good that those folks aren’t in charge. A f***in nightmare and fascistoid beyond belief. That’s Roland Freisler-esque.
Did you see the way they looked at that girl?!
my personal reason is i smelled BS after reading your words. this post only doubles down on the BS.How you can be so certain of what happened and cry wolf when the public information is that limited is peculiar.
Of course I’m playing both sides. That’s what due process is. You don’t seem to have grasped this concept if you’re talking about “playing both sides”. Sure I am. And you know who does too?! Judges when they gather intel and evidence and AFTER that they reach a verdict. You may have personal reason for your thinking I’m not aware of. But I think you’re too quick in your judgement.