A friend of mine described the show this way: "They nailed it from the first episode – it felt like Star Trek right away". After finally watching the first three episodes I agree with him. I gave some thought to what that means. What made SNW 'feel like Star Trek' while other Trek versions didn't?
I think the biggest factor was the decision to go with encapsulated episodes. Squeezing a complete story into 45 minutes forces the show to get to the point and follow an idea from beginning to the end. And that's what I've been missing in the Trek-verse – the big ideas that were the hallmark of TOS and TNG. What we've seen instead have been story arcs that paused too long for reflection, over-sculpting characters in an attempt to create depth that took years to evolve with Trek characters of the past. Unfortunately, you can't rush character development, especially with a franchise like Star Trek that was built on concept over character.
Trek has great characters, but they developed on the job, incrementally, in opposition to that week's crisis. Nobody wallowed in angst or needed a long backstory for us to know and love them. There was no need for flashbacks to explain the complex relationship between McCoy and Spock; it happened in snippets of conversation in real-time. Time was running out to save the ship, themselves, or an alien culture, and as Spock and McCoy ripped into each other we got to know them. Same with Picard in his relationships with Riker, Worf, Data, Klingons and Cardassians. We got to know who he was by watching him at work.
Of course Trek had its essential personal episodes, but they were never over-flavoured or over-long. Once the personal episode ended, you knew everyone would be back at work tackling next week's big concept. That's what I hope to see with SNW – stories that focus on ideas, decisions, and consequences, with characters who develop organically as the sum of each of them.