I honestly can't see a way to do this. Can anyone else? If we go all in this year (except hold onto Martin), how do we restock in time for Martin's window? There will not be many pieces to move next season. Gibson and a couple OAs yes, but beyond that? Maybe we get lucky and Clattenburg becomes a trade chip next year, but I'm not holding my breath. Everyone else on the roster is likely a part of that Martin window.
No, if we empty the cupboard this season, then the best I can see us doing asset-wise in time for the Martin era is to get back to neutral in the cupboard. Probably sacrificing our opportunity to do something significant with Martin while he's here. And in keeping Martin this deadline, we probably can't stay in the arms race this deadline either.
Do we need a big sell this deadline though? Maybe not. This offseason, our current roster looks to turn over 8 players (3 OAs, plus 5 out of 8 '04s). That includes both imports. I think we are in good shape with our current pipeline to fill those 8 spaces. We were very impressed this preseason by four of our '07s (Gillen, Solomon, Smith, Charron). Add in the top two picks from the 2024 draft, plus two imports selections and we have filled our 8 spots with lots of quality (all of which should be more than borderline OHL players).
I understand the desire to participate in a deep sell-off this deadline in preparation for the Martin era, but I really don't see the need. We have drafted pretty well the last couple of years. Standing pat this deadline allows this current group to have a chance to show what they can do, while giving our young core a chance to experience a little run. The sell-off next season (Gibson and a couple OAs) shouldn't be significant enough to cause a big tank, and as our young core takes over they should still be able to make the playoffs next year. That allows the Martin group to continue building off what they learned this year and prepares them for a big year when Martin is 18 years old.
But why make the Jack Beck move if we aren't going all-in? It's the same as trading for Thompson... waste of assets! That's the kind of half in, half out crap I'm talking about in my earlier post.
so i'd look at that as us having 8 splash pieces, and london having 7. 2nds and 3rds are the cost of doing business and making a splash will typically cost a high end prospect or two. either team is emptying the cupboads to go all in imo. so if they're in no position to make a splash how do you figure we are?