SSM Greyhounds 2023-24 Season Thread (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

HockeyPops

Registered User
Aug 20, 2018
7,804
6,864
We can't make that move (moving out another forward) without then bringing in another forward though. We are already running one forward fewer than we had.
 

Houndzfan20

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
630
620
We can't make that move (moving out another forward) without then bringing in another forward though. We are already running one forward fewer than we had.
possibility to bring montroy back for the remainder of the year or did we cut ties with him?
 

DeletedAccountt

Registered User
Oct 14, 2017
2,338
1,396
So I’m not sure if this defines “aggressive “ at the deadline at all.

He shortened our forward core and did not strengthen the d.

If it’s all he does, it’s not enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dirty12

DWI Dale

Registered User
Mar 23, 2014
2,149
2,072
The Soo
So I’m not sure if this defines “aggressive “ at the deadline at all.

He shortened our forward core and did not strengthen the d.

If it’s all he does, it’s not enough.

Hey, HF and I agree on something!
 

Houndzfan20

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
630
620
So I’m not sure if this defines “aggressive “ at the deadline at all.

He shortened our forward core and did not strengthen the d.

If it’s all he does, it’s not enough.
There has to be another move in the making. i can't see moving forward with just this group. we are one injury away from disaster. even bring up montroy now that the younger kids have gone. he's a decently skilled 18 year old that already knows our systems and will play
 

SSMHoundsFan

Greyhounds/FlamesFan
Dec 30, 2014
1,633
562
Sault Ste. Marie, ON
There has to be another move in the making. i can't see moving forward with just this group. we are one injury away from disaster. even bring up montroy now that the younger kids have gone. he's a decently skilled 18 year old that already knows our systems and will play
Would hope he'd have an instant impact and wouldn't take away from what we have going this season though if he is brought up
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeletedAccountt

DWI Dale

Registered User
Mar 23, 2014
2,149
2,072
The Soo
There has to be another move in the making. i can't see moving forward with just this group. we are one injury away from disaster.

i feel the same about defense. we can't rely on Virgilio, BMB and Evans imo. I'd like to see another veteran defense added so we can keep BMB and Evans upstairs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiggityDawg

Houndzfan20

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
630
620
Would hope he'd have an instant impact and wouldn't take away from what we have going this season though if he is brought up

To be fair, i'm not even really that concerned about the impact he would make statistically. as long as he isn't messing up all the time i'd be happy. but he had a pretty decent training camp and pre-season. just got caught up in a numbers game. i always liked his skillset. thought he'd put it all together this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeletedAccountt

SSMHoundsFan

Greyhounds/FlamesFan
Dec 30, 2014
1,633
562
Sault Ste. Marie, ON
To be fair, i'm not even really that concerned about the impact he would make statistically. as long as he isn't messing up all the time i'd be happy. but he had a pretty decent training camp and pre-season. just got caught up in a numbers game. i always liked his skillset. thought he'd put it all together this year.
Id throw him on the 4th line with Hayes and Martin if that's the case, give that line a bit of veteran presence
 

HockeyPops

Registered User
Aug 20, 2018
7,804
6,864
All this Montroy talk is crazy talk. If Montroy was part of the plans he would have been with the team all year.

As for trading Virgilio, at this point I would be pissed if he gets traded. You don't negotiate a deal like the one that Raftis did for Hayes, keeping all our 06s and 07s save for Kostov, to just go and trade Virgilio now. We don't need a top pairing D. We need a 4/5 D. If we have to trade Virgilio to get a fourth D that is not good asset management.

If Raftis prioritized getting a defenseman, he should have made his OA upgrade an OA defenseman, and in the Hayes trade he should have moved a defenseman instead of 2 forwards. But he didn't. Which tells me it was not a priority for him.

Still possible he adds a depth defenseman, but not for Virgilio, and I'm not holding my breath on it.
 
Last edited:

DeletedAccountt

Registered User
Oct 14, 2017
2,338
1,396
IMG_2465.jpeg


All this Montroy talk is crazy talk. If Montroy was part of the plans he would have been with the team all year.

As for trading Virgilio, at this point I would be pissed if he gets traded. You don't negotiate a deal like the one that Raftis did for Hayes, keeping all our 06s and 07s save for Kostov, to just go and trade Virgilio now. We don't need a top pairing D. We need a 4/5 D. If we have to trade Virgilio to get a fourth D that is not good asset management.

If Raftis prioritized getting a defenseman, he should have made his OA upgrade an OA defenseman, and in the Hayes trade he should have moved a defenseman instead of 2 forwards. But he didn't. Which tells me it was not a priority for him.

Still possible he adds a depth defenseman, but not for Virgilio, and I'm not holding my breath on it.

I agree on Montroy talks, he would have spent the entire season here if so.

It’s more likely to slot in Solomon on D than call-up Montroy on F to fill holes haha
 

OHL4Life

Registered User
Sep 6, 2017
4,860
4,810
All this Montroy talk is crazy talk. If Montroy was part of the plans he would have been with the team all year.

As for trading Virgilio, at this point I would be pissed if he gets traded. You don't negotiate a deal like the one that Raftis did for Hayes, keeping all our 06s and 07s save for Kostov, to just go and trade Virgilio now. We don't need a top pairing D. We need a 4/5 D. If we have to trade Virgilio to get a fourth D that is not good asset management.

If Raftis prioritized getting a defenseman, he should have made his OA upgrade an OA defenseman, and in the Hayes trade he should have moved a defenseman instead of 2 forwards. But he didn't. Which tells me it was not a priority for him.

Still possible he adds a depth defenseman, but not for Virgilio, and I'm not holding my breath on it.
i dont know if virgilio has the market value that you guys think.
 

Houndzfan20

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
630
620
i dont know if virgilio has the market value that you guys think.
he may not. but those that watch him every night are excited for what he will bring as an 18-19 year old. he's already playing very good as a 17 year old. i'd rather we keep him anyway.
 

HockeyPops

Registered User
Aug 20, 2018
7,804
6,864
Actually, now looking at the forwards again, I'm wondering if they don't try Allard on the 3rd line in Clattenburg's place, maybe pushing Brown to the wing? The two new acquisitions can play together on the 2nd line?

Beck - BMB - Mignosa
D'Intino - Frasca - Hayes, G
Brown - Allard - Cloutier
Fantino - Martin - Hayes, T
Vader

The other option might be flopping Brown and Fantino? Or maybe trying brown on the wing on the 2nd line?

Next two games are at home. Maybe they try stacking the top two lines with a 3rd pure checking line for the home games where they can control the matchups, and then try spreading out 3 scoring lines for the away games?
 

Houndzfan20

Registered User
Oct 31, 2017
630
620
this is what i had been thinking.


BeckBMBG. Hayes
D'IntinoAllardFrasca
CloutierBrownMignosa
FantinoMartinT. Hayes

i think Hayes with Beck and BMB would be unstoppable. I wouldn't be opposed to moving allard to the wing on second line, and letting frasca take the draws. Mignosa on that wing would balance it out with some finesse.

could leave Dino Brown Cloutier on 3rd line? i'd keep 4th together. just swap Vader and Fanitno in and out,.
 

HockeyPops

Registered User
Aug 20, 2018
7,804
6,864
Yeah, I was thinking by splitting up Beck and G. Hayes you have 1A and 1B lines, but I understand where you are coming from.

One thing I don't think we will see is Frasca on the RW. We are pretty deep on the right side with the addition of G. Hayes, so I can't see Frasca on the off wing.
 

Fischhaber

Registered User
Sep 3, 2014
3,269
1,786
I'm pleased that we kept Virgilio and we don't need to add to our defense for that reason. It's already 5 deep with really good players and a couple of solid rookies to boot.

Kudryavtsev doesn't get enough credit as the league's top defensive defenseman, who can also chip in points. Watch when he plays. It's surprising if the other team even gets a shot. I didn't count a single one against Oshawa. This guy is going to eat up 30 minutes in the playoffs and shut down opponents. Gibson has that ability on the right nights as well.

I just want to see another forward added for cheap. Preferably an 04 with playoff experience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad