HockeyPops
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2018
- 7,804
- 6,864
I think Raftis has done great. Going into the deadline I wanted two moves, for two impact players. Raftis delivered. Personally I thought a forward and a defenseman, but Raftis opted for two forwards. The most important thing was to not half ass it - one move was not enough, and 3rd liners did not move the needle.
There will be much debate about which OA should have gone back, about whether we should have gotten a D, or a G, instead, or maybe a different forward. I welcome that (and will likely be a big part of it).
But Raftis jumped in with both feet and did what he thought was the best chance to win. Let's see how it goes from here.
There will be much debate about which OA should have gone back, about whether we should have gotten a D, or a G, instead, or maybe a different forward. I welcome that (and will likely be a big part of it).
But Raftis jumped in with both feet and did what he thought was the best chance to win. Let's see how it goes from here.
Last edited: