Off-season thread: SSM Greyhounds Off-season Thread
Prospects tracker: SSM Greyhounds 2022-23 Season Thread
Prospects tracker: SSM Greyhounds 2022-23 Season Thread
Hmmmmm......(checks the other 3 teams bidding, we have more pages of posts than any of them)
I don't see how a team can justify selling big when they haven't missed the second round of the playoffs for a decade.Not disputing traffic is down compared to contending years. I suspect attendance is also down compared to contending years. Those trends are normal and expected IMO. Tough to judge though whether or not it is down more or less than expected. Perhaps your suggested method might shed some light if you went back to previous non contending years and checked to volumes, although it might ignore other trends such as posters joining/leaving the forum, etc. I also agree that's way too much work lol.
For me, I am also feeling blase. But I think my concern stems more from the perceived lack of young talent. I was more excited at the start of the season, expecting more from the young returning forwards (Mignosa, Cloutier, Montroy) and hoping for a spark from the new forwards (Ballard, Brown, Clattenburg, Moses, Good, Kostov). For me, only Kostov is currently meeting expectations out of that large group. I am getting very concerned in our ability to draft quality forwards.
I have come to terms with the way Raftis operates. He never sells big, so he never has assets to go all in. There are pros and cons to that approach that we have and will continue to debate, I am sure. But if you can't draft well, you are never going to be able to contend.
Still, we have lots of season left. The last few games it looks like Hookey might be waking up. Maybe a few of the other forwards follow his lead and start taking big steps. Here's hoping.
if being an easy second round out is your "CUP" then that explains a lot lol.I don't see how a team can justify selling big when they haven't missed the second round of the playoffs for a decade.
seems like he's been a longshot at every step in his career for sure. always seems to get himself through with his work ethic and likeability.I'm incredibly happy to see Mac Hallowell get on the board last night with the Leafs. I had him as a longshot - he keeps proving me wrong.
During the radio broadcast, Gerry mentioned that Schenkel was on the bench but unavailable to back up Ivanov. I'd imagine that it's the injury that has Miller being recalled.Sounds like Miller might be recalled from what I've heard. Either Schenkels injury is going to keep him out a while, or Ivanov is on the move....
This comment "Mignosa, Cloutier, Montroy) and hoping for a spark from the new forwards (Ballard, Brown, Clattenburg, Moses, Good, Kostov). For me, only Kostov is currently meeting expectations out of that large group. " Really fustrated me because every year we have been able to pluck a very good player out of the lower rounds and you worried about our drafting. Personally Clattenburg has really impressed me play pently kill, gets under player skin and finishes every check. As for good he has really gotten the chance and when he does he play 2 shifts the whole game. Montroy just got call up give him time to practice with team. And he never sells I'm sorry why did taylor raddysh come her or Anthony delangelo. What do last year should we have traded BMB? To run not a chance honestly I don't feel like the Thompson trade even hurt us.Not disputing traffic is down compared to contending years. I suspect attendance is also down compared to contending years. Those trends are normal and expected IMO. Tough to judge though whether or not it is down more or less than expected. Perhaps your suggested method might shed some light if you went back to previous non contending years and checked to volumes, although it might ignore other trends such as posters joining/leaving the forum, etc. I also agree that's way too much work lol.
For me, I am also feeling blase. But I think my concern stems more from the perceived lack of young talent. I was more excited at the start of the season, expecting more from the young returning forwards (Mignosa, Cloutier, Montroy) and hoping for a spark from the new forwards (Ballard, Brown, Clattenburg, Moses, Good, Kostov). For me, only Kostov is currently meeting expectations out of that large group. I am getting very concerned in our ability to draft quality forwards.
I have come to terms with the way Raftis operates. He never sells big, so he never has assets to go all in. There are pros and cons to that approach that we have and will continue to debate, I am sure. But if you can't draft well, you are never going to be able to contend.
Still, we have lots of season left. The last few games it looks like Hookey might be waking up. Maybe a few of the other forwards follow his lead and start taking big steps. Here's hoping.
At least you are feeling the frustration the rest of us are feeling.This comment ... Really fustrated me
I am not convinced Clattenburg is going to be anything more than another Jacklin. Besides, plucking a very good player from the lower rounds is only an advantage when you have already made good selections in the upper rounds. In the past we have seen our second year players take leaps forward. It hasn't happened yet with any of our forwards despite there being oodles of opportunity available for any player that shows a glimpse of something.Personally Clattenburg has really impressed me play pently kill, gets under player skin and finishes every check
Yes, thank you for the reminder. I agree with everything you posted here. My gripe is with the forwards, not the defense or goaltending (for once). I am very high on the back end actually, and just don't want to waste the opportunity by failing to complement them with capable forwards.May I remind you that Matthew virgillo was supposed to be a Top 5 pick. Not to mention Landon Miller will be good. Be patient.
Clattenburg was a 10th rounder! He is a very different player than Jacklin. Clattenburg is always in your face where Jacklin was not interested in playing. We don't have many second year forwards just sayingAt least you are feeling the frustration the rest of us are feeling.
I am not convinced Clattenburg is going to be anything more than another Jacklin. Besides, plucking a very good player from the lower rounds is only an advantage when you have already made good selections in the upper rounds. In the past we have seen our second year players take leaps forward. It hasn't happened yet with any of our forwards despite there being oodles of opportunity available for any player that shows a glimpse of something.
To be frank, it seems like we rounded out our roster this year with a bunch of forwards who are maybe not even OHL calibre. The Greyhounds are a team built on skill. But when I look at our roster of 12 forwards born 2004 or later, the only ones who I can picture EVER playing top 6 are big MCB, Allard, Mignosa, Brown. That's not a good sign for a mem cup bid, or even for a retool to get ready for another run in a few years.
Yes, thank you for the reminder. I agree with everything you posted here. My gripe is with the forwards, not the defense or goaltending (for once). I am very high on the back end actually, and just don't want to waste the opportunity by failing to complement them with capable forwards.
Clattenburg is fine as a 4th line forward I guess but they seem to have players of this similar mold throughout a forward group that lacks top end skill.Clattenburg was a 10th rounder! He is a very different player than Jacklin. Clattenburg is always in your face where Jacklin was not interested in playing. We don't have many second year forwards just saying
said this before, but there was a bit exit on the scouting side after the 02 draft. since then raftis promoted someone with not a great deal of experience to the top of the scouting team and really, how good have their drafts been? id offer not good at all.At least you are feeling the frustration the rest of us are feeling.
I am not convinced Clattenburg is going to be anything more than another Jacklin. Besides, plucking a very good player from the lower rounds is only an advantage when you have already made good selections in the upper rounds. In the past we have seen our second year players take leaps forward. It hasn't happened yet with any of our forwards despite there being oodles of opportunity available for any player that shows a glimpse of something.
To be frank, it seems like we rounded out our roster this year with a bunch of forwards who are maybe not even OHL calibre. The Greyhounds are a team built on skill. But when I look at our roster of 12 forwards born 2004 or later, the only ones who I can picture EVER playing top 6 are big MCB, Allard, Mignosa, Brown. That's not a good sign for a mem cup bid, or even for a retool to get ready for another run in a few years.
Yes, thank you for the reminder. I agree with everything you posted here. My gripe is with the forwards, not the defense or goaltending (for once). I am very high on the back end actually, and just don't want to waste the opportunity by failing to complement them with capable forwards.
That's not selling, that's BUYING!And he never sells I'm sorry why did taylor raddysh come her or Anthony delangelo. What do last year should we have traded BMB? To run not a chance honestly I don't feel like the Thompson trade even hurt us.
I wouldn't say they were not good at all. But if you want to avoid a rebuild they need to be good every year.said this before, but there was a bit exit on the scouting side after the 02 draft. since then raftis promoted someone with not a great deal of experience to the top of the scouting team and really, how good have their drafts been? id offer not good at all.
comparing it to other soo drafts, its not even close to as successful. i think theyve gone from the best drafting team in the ohl to a very average drafting team.I wouldn't say they were not good at all. But if you want to avoid a rebuild they need to be good every year.
I still really like their 2020 draft ('04s).
BMB is good in the 1st. Carlisle and Schenkel good in the 5th. Allard good in the 7th.
Toms is ok in the 3rd. Van De Ven, still not sure about, was in the 13th.
Spent a late 4th on McGroarty and didn't have a 2nd. Also had a couple other flyer picks taken late on good players who didn't report. Those are acceptible as long as you hit on your other picks as he did that year.
The 2022 draft ('06s) is also shaping up to be a good one. Brown has started slow, but too early to give up on him. The next 4 picks are all looking really solid so far. And who knows, there may be a few more gems we find in those later round picks when next training camp rolls around.
The 2019 draft ('03s) at this point looks like a complete bust. Savard (11th round) the only bright spot.
The 2021 draft ('05s) has a few good players but is probably below average overall. Not much depth in there at all past the 4th round, and a couple picks in the top 4 that are underperforming relative to their position.
Same. I've been saying for years that we have to sell the farm and be in contention every fourth year.That's not selling, that's BUYING!
Selling is how you restock the cupboards after making a run. We didn't do that after going all-in in 2018. We shouldn't have sold BMB we need him next year. But we SHOULD have sold guys like Frost, Hayton, O'Rourke, or Kerins. I've heard every excuse over the years... "It's a buyers market" ... "They didn't want to leave"... etc.
Mix in a few longshot draft picks that were never going to come here and a series of imports not reporting and you get what you see today.
We also don't have any top tier talent to trade this year so we have failed to stockpile 2nds and 3rds which are needed to make deals at the deadline next season.
I know I sound like a broken record but this is exactly what some of us have been warning about since 2019 and it really baffles my mind that some of you are so shocked that this is where we are at talent wise. You were sold magic beans about not needing to rebuild. Does anybody have buyers remorse yet?
I can agree with this. They seem to have had their share of misses. But a pretty good 2020 and 2022 draft is a great start to the next cycle if they can get a good 2023 draft as well. Let's see what happens this summer.i think theyve gone from the best drafting team in the ohl to a very average drafting team.