Off-season thread: SSM Greyhounds Off-season Thread
Prospects tracker: SSM Greyhounds 2022-23 Season Thread
Prospects tracker: SSM Greyhounds 2022-23 Season Thread
It's a long shot but Rutger McGroarty reporting plus an elite import is possibly our only chance at being a bonafide contender.
Rutger is the longest of longshots and we have haven't had great success the past 4 seasons in recruiting impact imports so I'm pretty cynical to say the least.
Isn't Dean in the last year of his contract? That could make the offseason a bit more interesting too. Assuming he makes it to the end of the season.
Is this an early sign we might move on from some of our sophomores who haven't developed as hoped?With these two signings, things are guaranteed to be very competitive at camp next fall. We have 25 players signed this year that could all have roster spots next year. Only 3 are OAs next year. This also does not include a second import or at least a couple of 2007 borns that we draft this summer. This also does not include any surprise reports from our flyer picks. Raftis is certainly taking a different approach with our 16 year old class this season ('06s) by already signing 7 of them(!) I do not recall him ever signing more than 4 the first season.
I would rather have had Bannister tbh. We had structure under him and our puck possession was great. Under that style it didn't matter if we had talent, it worked. Look at 2015/16. I can't watch anymore of this dump and chase. And then curse out your team when your crappy system doesn't work.Look guys if you think opening up only a couple positions next year and then running wirh this group is gonna fly, let's start praying now.
But the problem also we got is 2 fold now. You can't just change the whole team at trade deadline and expect results either. You need to build that type of winning chemistry over time.
And I feel bad for Dean. He hasn't been given a good deck since he got here. To be honest I would have preferred him over Bannister with the stacked group he had.
You can blame this depth problem we have on covid too if ya want, but the bottom line. The scouting staff and gm just didn't do their homework on the last few drafts or you can just call it bad luck.
even if your 1st rounder doesn't pan out your second should be pushing that guy out of a spot (in most cases)
Evans looked quite good, showed poise.Did anyone get to watch last night? Did Vader or Evans get much ice? How did they look?
Ya they got the "rookie" warm up. Neither hurt the team or shyed away from the play. Not enough veiwing or playing time for much more but they made the best of the opportunity.Did anyone get to watch last night? Did Vader or Evans get much ice? How did they look?
I think anything is possible IF we get the bid...the whole roster could be blown up in the offseason depending on who Raftis manages to lure hereLooking through rose coloured glasses for a moment, If we were to win the mem cup bid and get some of these players to report, they would be taking a roster spot from an existing player. Roster turnover will only be 3 players (the OAs) through attrition. Those spots would be reserved for our first 2 picks from this coming draft, plus a second import. If any of our 2003s were to not return, they would be replaced by another '03 (OA) if we were looking to contend next season.