Off-season thread: SSM Greyhounds Off-season Thread
Prospects tracker: SSM Greyhounds 2022-23 Season Thread
Prospects tracker: SSM Greyhounds 2022-23 Season Thread
This should probably be the way to go. Anything that makes sense to help this and next year plus sell off what you can to add picks to the war chest. Should be able to get some picks back for the guys you mentioned.In 2019-2020 we were in the midst of a bid and in the first 19 games had only collected 13 points. Now, we did bring in Brkin on Nov 12 which helped right the ship. Then we dumped Jacklin and Wale at the deadline. We might be looking at something similar here; bring in a reinforcement now (forward) to prop up the team, then do a light sell at the deadline (Watson? Ivanov? Brzustowski? D'Intino?)
Well him and Paps must be cut from the same piece of cloth. Shy to pull the trigger! But the lad in NB isn't afraid of nothing.When was the last Raftis made a meaningful trade ? Jack Thompson? Before that? Has always seemed a bit shy in that department
Wasn't at the game, but I can't think of a time when I enjoyed listening to fans give it to an 18 year old kid. It has no place in junior hockey, imo.Kudos to all of the fans who were giving it to Logan Mailloux. He said some pretty nasty things back, but you wouldn't expect anything less. That kind of person has no place in our league.
It wasn't muchWasn't at the game, but I can't think of a time when I enjoyed listening to fans give it to an 18 year old kid. It has no place in junior hockey, imo.
This is one of the few circumstances where it is warranted. A person who doesn't deserve to play in the league should get heckled.Wasn't at the game, but I can't think of a time when I enjoyed listening to fans give it to an 18 year old kid. It has no place in junior hockey, imo.
Disagree. Branch should get heckled. The government should get heckled. The kid is just operating within the framework that the others provide. And he is 18.This is one of the few circumstances where it is warranted. A person who doesn't deserve to play in the league should get heckled.
Your opinion, but the league says otherwise. This isn't one of those countries that promote public stoning, but I could see you as part of the crowd that would enjoy that sort of spectacle.This is one of the few circumstances where it is warranted. A person who doesn't deserve to play in the league should get heckled.
With Raftis, who knows? He rarely sells as much as we fans would like him to. From what I hear, Ivanov is one of the most liked guys in the dressing room. He will be back next year, when the Soo hopes to contend, and it's not like we have a glut of OA options coming back.What do u guys think the likelihood is you trade Ivanov?
What do u guys think the likelihood is you trade Ivanov?
With Raftis, who knows? He rarely sells as much as we fans would like him to. From what I hear, Ivanov is one of the most liked guys in the dressing room. He will be back
next year, when the Soo hopes to contend, and it's not like we have a glut of OA options coming back.
We spent a high draft pick this year on a goalie who seems to be doing well (Miller has the highest save % of all 16 y/o in the NOJHL). Personally, I would trade Ivanov if there was demand for him.
Ha! However, with many other more boneheaded moves by GMs in the league just this season, that doesn't appear to be a fireable offense.If Raftis wastes a OA spot on Ivanov he should be fired.
You're not wrong hahaHa! However, with many other more boneheaded moves by GMs in the league just this season, that doesn't appear to be a fireable offense.
People in the league believe the same thing, but they made a decision to serve their financial interests.Your opinion, but the league says otherwise. This isn't one of those countries that promote public stoning, but I could see you as part of the crowd that would enjoy that sort of spectacle.
The framework provided is that you can't take sexual videos of people without their consent or then redistribute those videos (again without the persons consent) to try to humiliate the girl. So no, he definitely did not operate within the framework that the others provided. Branch didn't do that for him. The government didn't do that for him. He did that. He made that decision and took advantage of that girl in that way. Really bad look to be downplaying that. Be better.Disagree. Branch should get heckled. The government should get heckled. The kid is just operating within the framework that the others provide. And he is 18.
There is some really good discussion and debate to be had on that topic. But I know you don't want that. You prefer the easy way out.The framework provided is that you can't take sexual videos of people without their consent or then redistribute those videos (again without the persons consent) to try to humiliate the girl. So no, he definitely did not operate within the framework that the others provided. Branch didn't do that for him. The government didn't do that for him. He did that. He made that decision and took advantage of that girl in that way. Really bad look to be downplaying that. Be better.
"While I find what Mailloux did to be deplorable, I do believe in second chances. The fact that he is a hockey player should not dictate whether he gets to earn a living in the sport due to his crime. By the letter of Swedish law, he did pay his debt to society. Whether you think the punishment was too lenient is a different argument altogether. Being a pro-hockey player obviously casts a spotlight on what he did, however, there are many people in our society who have committed similar crimes or worse and are still allowed to make a living once their debt to society is paid."