As we spoke about so often on here at the time, we didn't have the personnel for a man-man D system. It was such a dumb system to implement. The guys without the agility and foot speed got badly exposed and it made them look horrific. That's just a coach really stubbornly trying to force the players to fit a system to the detriment of everyone.
Just prior, Tortorella's "black and blue" brand of hockey put a lot of miles on our defense very quickly, which also didn't help anything, either.
I look at Corsi to some degree, but I don't put all my stock in it. Corsi is what it is, but there's 4 other guys on the ice with you, too, who are influencing those numbers.
Perhaps, but it’s also a coin that has two sides and it was never about the best way to play defense. We also didn’t have guys that could move the puck there meaning that there would have been a great risk for us to be very flat offensively.
The defense were the sole reason for why we could have so high shooting percentage those years. We played defense with speed under our skates and when we won the puck we could turn the play really fast, often with a cross ice pass, and hence avoided the tremendous problems we faced under Torts against hard checking teams nor did the trap kill us offensively.
Defensively we sucked and lived on Hank. But sometimes this issue is talked about as only being about defense, it wasn’t as simple as that for sure.