Agreed. People dont realize that while Smith was never a big point producer, he consistently got the puck up ice into the offensive zone in the transition game. His advanced stats show this as well. He was one of Detroits better dmen (which isnt saying much) and played tough. On a team like New York where he could play as the number 4 with a good partner he looked terrific.
Anyone else get the sickening feeling that Holland is going to make a play for Duchene?
Tatar is getting 5m/yr minimum.
It has nothing to do with picks and everything to do with the fact that there isn't a defenseman available who would:
a) sign with Detroit
b) sign a contract Detroit can afford without major contract movement
c) improve the team in a meaningful way
Are you, the defender of all that is the Illitch's collective pocketbook, really advocating they just throw away a few million dollars on an irrelevant piece?
Yeah, initial views of Smith in NYR doesn't look good for us. At some point we're going to have to wonder if the Wings didn't horribly misuse the guy, or if everyone judged him far too severely for what he wasn't rather than for what he was.
Four years though? And the Rangers fans seem to love him.
Something doesn't add up.
Nah. There are lots of options to improve the team. You set a trap there with 'meaningful', because to you that means improved enough to be a top 3 or 4 seed.
Obviously, their intent is different, in that they want to improve the team enough to make the playoffs.
1 goal in 30 games.
Danny dekeyser
5 million dollar cap hit
1 goal in last 31 games
And people said DK had a bad season, and he did have a bad season.
Same people are saying Smith earned a 4 year deal and almost 4. Are you saying if DK played like he did last year for a whole whopping mil less you'd have been fine with it?
Yes, one opinion is based on five years of watching him underperform his expectations and only look like a viable middle pairing guy in the playoffs series the Wings made it to. Smith is good when everything is go go go and pinballing around when he doesn't have to make decisions. He has good instincts but is very lacking in hockey smarts.
When you rely on him to hold down a defensive spot over the long term, you see his flaws. Basically, he's the hockey version of Ramon Santiago or Mikie Mahtook. They'll look very good when sprinkled in to the point you're like "maybe we should give them more time", and then they get exposed and you're reminded why you didn't play them all the time.
This will end up being a god awful contract that the Rangers fans will complain about by January 2018.
If they are gonna put a continually bad product n the ice with no end goal they should reduce the ticket prices
Nah. There are lots of options to improve the team. You set a trap there with 'meaningful', because to you that means improved enough to be a top 3 or 4 seed.
I think dekeyser didn't just have a bad year, I don't think he is all that good in the first place and is overpaid for what he brings or can provide
Are they forcing you to buy a ticket?
Look, man, I don't know what to tell you. I stopped regularly buying pro sports tickets a loooong time ago, so maybe my perspective on this is just different. I think last year I went in on a suite for a UM MSU game the might Mike passed and that was the only time I went to the Joe all year. Didn't do a Lions or Pistons game. Went to one Tigers game.
That's about average, I'd guess.
The point being, pro teams don't owe you jack. Outside of the NHL, most teams make wildly more from everything else than they do from gate now, anyway. They make 30 mil a year just from FSD. I don't think they're going to chase you away from the arena with a stick, but driving butts to seats isn't going to be top of list, either.
One thing that will absolutely keep people from showing up? Being bad. In effect, the degree the team actually cares about in-person attendance is the degree they're going to avoid tanking.
This isn't entirely his fault, though. He was built up as a 30+ point, offensive catalyst who would anchor our blueline. Instead, he might just be a 10-15 point guy who logs 20+ minutes a night, skates the puck out of trouble, and adds some grit.
I think it's just as likely we didn't utilize him well, and put unrealistic expectations on the guy, as it is he's Ramon Santiago. We'll find out in a year or two, probably.
One thing I'd like to address is how Holland seems to be inferring that
1) we will have a large amount of cap space available to make these moves (conservatively 3.5 even for two bargain bin specials like Campbell and Hansey), but also spots.
It really leads me to wonder if Kronwall is planning on playing next year. These statements don't seem to be consistent with the reality of our cap