WTFMAN99
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2009
- 34,650
- 12,827
Tocchet or Trotz?
I don't know if Trotz comes in for a lame duck GM like Dubas though.
I don't know if Trotz comes in for a lame duck GM like Dubas though.
You are blaming him for things that I believe the players take more of a share of blame for.
I think Keefe has made decent strategic decisions with the rosters he's been given. I don't think he's killing this team from a strategic standpoint, but I do think he's lost the room and the inmates are running the asylum now.
Most of what you described falls on Kyle, goaltending, and the guys being paid 55% of the cap, all of whom played like average 2nd lines rather than franchise cornerstones.
I don't think you could plug Sutter in here and we'd look like Calgary - they have the right tools to play a Sutter game.
Yeah, silly Tampa and Colorado will also never win.A rookie analytics GM and a Rookie coach what did we expect.
Yeah, silly Tampa and Colorado will also never win.
I'm saying that writing somebody off because they're a rookie is stupid, which is pretty obvious considering the last 3 cups were won by a team with rookie GMs and coaches.Are you suggesting that all tandems are equal?
He's really not, and I'm not sure how this myth started.Dubas is a preacher of some strange conceptualized reinvention of the game.
"Catastrophic failure second to no other". Can we stop with the silly hyperbole?For the level of talent on the ice over the past years, it's a catastrophic failure second to no other.
I'm saying that writing somebody off because they're a rookie is stupid, which is pretty obvious considering the last 3 cups were won by a team with rookie GMs and coaches.
Last year's Cup winner even wanted specifically Dubas.
He's really not, and I'm not sure how this myth started.
"Catastrophic failure second to no other". Can we stop with the silly hyperbole?
Also, it's weird when people seem to think they're entitled to a cup, but then blame the person who put together the roster with that potential, instead of the ones who didn't perform to that potential.
None of this really addresses the discussion, but I don't understand your point of view.I don't understand your point of view.
The goal of hockey is to win a cup
Matthews is at the tail end of his contract and his clause starts 2023.
The players don't really have good drive
We have not won a series in 6 years.
Dubas failure is complete. He has no 3rd or 4th line and a weak tandem in net.
It's really not hard to understand that the guy is done. Keefe too. There is nothing to salvage and only things to repair regarding his tenure here.
None of this really addresses the discussion, but I don't understand your point of view.
The goal of hockey is to win a cup, and we have a top-tier team capable of that. Barely losing some playoff series in our past does not change that.
Matthews still has multiple years left on his contract, and he is likely to be here for the next decade+.
There's nothing wrong with the "drive" of our players.
We have a 3rd and 4th line, and it's way too early to draw many conclusions about them. If we're going by this small sample, I don't know how you simultaneously argue that we have weak goalies when Samsonov is a top-5 goaltender so far this year.
Dubas will likely be here for a while, but if he does end up getting fired, he has left the team in a really good position.
I'm saying that writing somebody off because they're a rookie is stupid, which is pretty obvious considering the last 3 cups were won by a team with rookie GMs and coaches.
Last year's Cup winner even wanted specifically Dubas.
He's really not, and I'm not sure how this myth started.
"Catastrophic failure second to no other". Can we stop with the silly hyperbole?
Also, it's weird when people seem to think they're entitled to a cup, but then blame the person who put together the roster with that potential, instead of the ones who didn't perform to that potential.
What you're saying is essentially agreeing with me that "don't hire rookies, they'll obviously fail" is a ridiculously simplistic and incorrect statement that doesn't accurately convey their qualifications for the role or abilities in the job. Unfortunately, you then go on trying to make arbitrary distinctions between rookie GMs that there's really little difference between.While last 3 stanly cup were won by rookie gms, there's a bit of caviat to that
2 of them was won by Tampa Bay Lighting. Their GM is a guy name Julian Brisebois
He earned his right to be a GM in this league. He has long established and his roots in NHL hockey
- NHL Montreal Canadiens (Director of Hockey Operations) 2003-2006
- NHL Montreal Canadiens (VP. of Hockey Operations) 2006-2010
- AHL Hamilton Bulldogs (General Manager) 2007-2010
- NHL Tampa Bay Lightning (Assistant General Manager) 2010-2018
- AHL Norfolk Admirals (General Manager) 2010-2012
- AHL Syracuse Crunch (General Manager) 2012-2019
- NHL Tampa Bay Lightning (General Manager/VP. of Hockey Operations) 2018-present
He was director of operations in a team like Montreal Canadians. The mecca of hockey
He didn't just walk into a silly job after a 2 year internship under Lou like Kyle did and managing AHL team
There's a difference in just being a rookie. Julian is essentially the Sergei Makarov of NHL gms. Winning rookie of the year at the age of 32 where Julian becoming a GM at his age .
Are we goign to talk about Joe Sakic? sure.. Lets talk about the other rookie GM who was a legend in his own right playing the actual game. Who himself like Steve Y won Stanly cups, Olympics
Who himself knows what it takes to win. Players look at him differently. When he says this is what it takes to win, players will listen because he has done it
I can assure you just because all 3 of them are rookie GMs ( Dubas, Sakic and Julian) doesn't mean they are in the same stratosphere
If you are going to get a rookie GM, get a rookie GM. Make sure he's qualified. Make sure he understands the game. Make sure he has played the game. Paid his dues in some capacity
If it was Roberto Luongo, no problem.
Sean Burke, no problem
Kyle Dubas was just a Soo Grey Hound GM, then a AHL GM. There are 30 other AHL GMs will never become NHL gms in their lives. That's not how it works . Not with a historic franchise
We have 3rd and 4th lines, and while they've had a rough start, we shouldn't be drawing conclusions about them and how they'll play in the playoffs 8 games into the season and half a year before playoffs even start.We technically have 3rd and 4th lines, but they aren’t very good and they get less effective when the games get tough in the playoffs.
LOL. We lost to the CBJ & Montreal. Trying to whitewash a tar pit won't work.Barely losing some playoff series in our past does not change that.
We have 3rd and 4th lines, and while they've had a rough start, we shouldn't be drawing conclusions about them and how they'll play in the playoffs 8 games into the season and half a year before playoffs even start.
We don't even know what our 3rd and 4th lines will settle as yet for this season, let alone what it will be and how it will look in the playoffs.
Those 3 guys have a combined 8 goals in 129 playoff games lmaoWe know they will be populated by guys like Kerfoot, Jarnkrook, and Engvall. We know how that works out…
The difference between TBay and Colorado is unlike Dubas they didn't try to change the game.Yeah, silly Tampa and Colorado will also never win.
Yeah, silly Tampa and Colorado will also never win.
Yeah, silly Tampa and Colorado will also never win.