Sideshow Raheem
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2015
- 3,063
- 7
No he's not. His career SV% is .913 even though he was absolutely terrible this past season, a performance he's not likely to repeat given his career history at every level.
Sharks Roster Discussion Part V
- Thread starter rangerssharks414
- Start date
- Status
No he's not. His career SV% is .913 even though he was absolutely terrible this past season, a performance he's not likely to repeat given his career history at every level.
Juxtaposer
Outro: Divina Comedia
How could it really screw up our goaltending situation? And Jones is going to come in at $5.5-6M, $4M is great compared to that.
T0uGh C0oki3
Goodbye Jumbo Joe
- Dec 19, 2014
- 3,863
- 100
It's just a qualifying offer. And he doesn't rebound, we are stuck with him.
I just think we shouldn't touch what's not broke.
"Do no harm".
Juxtaposer
Outro: Divina Comedia
And I think we should look to upgrade wherever we can. If we can gain assets and upgrade goalies, why not?
Sideshow Raheem
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2015
- 3,063
- 7
Niemi has played almost three times as many games. Mrazek's career numbers are heavily impacted by this past season, which was admittedly horrible. But prior to that he had tremendous numbers at every level. Seems extremely likely he'll bounce back. He's still only 25 which is pretty young for a goalie.
Also Niemi was a good regular season goalie for us. Easily as good in the regular season if not better than Jones. It's the playoffs where he was a complete turd.
T0uGh C0oki3
Goodbye Jumbo Joe
- Dec 19, 2014
- 3,863
- 100
tiburon12
Registered User
- Jul 18, 2009
- 5,082
- 5,172
These next days will be awesome. I feel like this is where DW shines. He is a smart and shrewd dealer, and will somehow snake a good trade out of this draft week. I have a feeling we will end up with a guy another team left unprotected, like Marchessault or one of Dumba/Scandella
Gene Parmesan
Dedicated to babies who came feet first
Limekiller
Registered User
For all the wishing about Strome (and others, I am sure), I wouldn't get hopes up. If the Isles really are paying Vegas a 1st to not take a forward (obviously including Strome), it makes him being exposed totally irrelevant. They're keeping him. I would be highly surprised if other teams who look to have highly appealing players exposed didn't make similar types of deals. Hell, I could see DW offering Vegas a pick (we have a new 4th!) to get them to agree to take Boedker (or whoever our whipping boy bad contract is that day) off of our hands rather than taking Schlemko, etc.
PacificOceanPotion
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2009
- 6,191
- 5,018
Ive always been a Chiasson fan, i see Calgary didnt protect him. I wonder what the chances are that maybe DW inquires about his availability.
Juxtaposer
Outro: Divina Comedia
Sideshow Raheem
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2015
- 3,063
- 7
[Mod]
Gackle might be even stupider as far as people inexplicably paid to cover the Sharks. Was listening to his podcast and he said that a proposal of Hertl and Mueller for Matt Duchene would be laughable from Colorado's perspective and the Avs would never entertain it. He then went on to say a more realistic ask from Colorado for Duchene would be Tierney, Sorensen and Heed. In what universe are all three of those players combined worth more than Hertl alone, let alone Hertl and a guy who was worth a 2nd and 4th on the market?
Gackle might be even stupider as far as people inexplicably paid to cover the Sharks. Was listening to his podcast and he said that a proposal of Hertl and Mueller for Matt Duchene would be laughable from Colorado's perspective and the Avs would never entertain it. He then went on to say a more realistic ask from Colorado for Duchene would be Tierney, Sorensen and Heed. In what universe are all three of those players combined worth more than Hertl alone, let alone Hertl and a guy who was worth a 2nd and 4th on the market?
Last edited by a moderator:
hohosaregood
Banned
- Sep 1, 2011
- 33,070
- 13,697
Some interesting news on why Mrazek was exposed.
https://www.prohockeyrumors.com/2017/06/mrazek-exposed-attitude.html
https://www.prohockeyrumors.com/2017/06/mrazek-exposed-attitude.html
Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
Wild fan coming in peace... is the following deal a "no", a "no thank you" or a "hell no" from San Jose's point-of-view:
Scandella + Pominville + pick (our first this year is in the 3rd round)
for
Martin + #19 + Hansen
We clear a bit of cap, Martin serves as a buffer for Olofsson/Reilly being handed top 4 minutes on our club.
On your side, giving up the 1st rounder is probably pretty tough to do, but you guys reset the age clock on one of your top 4 LD going from 36 year old Martin to 27 year old Scandella (3 more years at $4m per) and upgrade from Hansen to Pominville (yes, I believe it's an upgrade).
Thoughts?
Scandella + Pominville + pick (our first this year is in the 3rd round)
for
Martin + #19 + Hansen
We clear a bit of cap, Martin serves as a buffer for Olofsson/Reilly being handed top 4 minutes on our club.
On your side, giving up the 1st rounder is probably pretty tough to do, but you guys reset the age clock on one of your top 4 LD going from 36 year old Martin to 27 year old Scandella (3 more years at $4m per) and upgrade from Hansen to Pominville (yes, I believe it's an upgrade).
Thoughts?
rangerssharks414
Registered User
PacificOceanPotion
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2009
- 6,191
- 5,018
Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
Sharksrule04
Registered User
Have no interest regardless of cap hit. Scandella has little to no offensive ability, Pommenville is old and not the player he once was and I wouldn't give up either of those players for a 3rd round pick. Honestly wouldn't even trade #19 for those guys. The trade really makes no sense for Sharks fans. If I'm trading with Minnesota only guys I'm look for are Dumba, Coyle, Nino, Zucker or Spurgeon. Everyone else would either cost too much or has a contract I don't want.
sjsharks92
Shark Tank Commander
hohosaregood
Banned
- Sep 1, 2011
- 33,070
- 13,697
Gecklund
Registered User
- Status
