Player Discussion Shane Pinto (C) - PART 2

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
with norris out do you move Pinto to 2C or keep him with motte and joseph because that line has been buzzing & hope that Brassard can fill into the 2nd line
Quite clearly this is what they should be doing on a 3 game win streak. Especially considering all three other lines are firing.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
Brassard has shown some chemistry with Giroux and Debrincat. Is it anything more than a band-aid? No, but having that 3rd line intact is a big reason for some of our early success and I don't see a need to mess with that until they cool off.
The best teams roll 4 lines. It's a long season, if it doesn't work then change it. Don't do anything right now. Debrincat Brassard Giroux were really good against the Habs albeit in exhibition. It's the best game Debrincat has had yet. Let's see it. That 4th line is an identity line and the 3rd line is on fire. Don't change it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nova Stutzlia

DJB

Registered User
Jan 6, 2009
16,544
11,400
twitter.com
But then you lose out on the beautiful chemistry Pinto has with Motte and Joseph.


I wouldn't necessarily say he's been better than any of the six forwards, but to be in the same discussion as those other six is huge for Pinto and us at this stage.

Pinto also had amazing chemistry with Giroux and Cat in the pre season.

I’d prefer everyone gets bumped up a spot. Not sure how a guy that’s been a healthy scratch for the first 4 games suddenly draws into a top 6C role because of injury.

Move Pinto to 2C, Kastelic to 3C and Brass to 4C
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
Pinto also had amazing chemistry with Giroux and Cat in the pre season.

I’d prefer everyone gets bumped up a spot. Not sure how a guy that’s been a healthy scratch for the first 4 games suddenly draws into a top 6C role because of injury.

Move Pinto to 2C, Kastelic to 3C and Brass to 4C
No way, they've won 3 in a row. They have been rolling 4 lines. That's why they've been good, fresh legs hard on the forcheck. Changing all the lines yuck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OD99 and aragorn

toxic poster

Registered User
Dec 24, 2017
632
384
Queen's
I'd prefer Pinto between DCat and Giroux. I think he is the best option to play in the top 6.

We are not going to be as good as with Norris in.. no matter how they are shuffled.

They can put Kastelic, Brass or Gambrell at 3C and one of them in at 4C.

Keep the top 2 lines as strong as we can make them.
I think it would be disappointing if he didn't get an opportunity to showcase himself in a top6 role with Norris out but on the other hand the third line has been imperative for us getting wins so far. Not so clear cut on what I'd want, personally
Quite clearly this is what they should be doing on a 3 game win streak. Especially considering all three other lines are firing.
Mostly agree, if Brass can slide into the 2C (where he's primarily played his entire career) and be a good stopgap while Norris is out that sounds ideal, but like I said above it's tough as a fan to not want to give Pinto all the opportunity possible and see what he can do with more skilled linemates flanking him despite the third line clicking so well. Will be interesting to see what DJ goes with
 

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,342
10,019
The best teams roll 4 lines. It's a long season, if it doesn't work then change it. Don't do anything right now. Debrincat Brassard Giroux were really good against the Habs albeit in exhibition. It's the best game Debrincat has had yet. Let's see it. That 4th line is an identity line and the 3rd line is on fire. Don't change it.
Exactly. I suggested Brassard to 2c immediately. Every line is clicking. Every line doing well. Putting Brassard in the 2c spot is the least disruptive thing to do, especially on short notice.

Brassard isn't a 2c anymore. But, two years ago we had guys that weren't 2c calibre needing to carrying a line of guys that weren't 2nd line players. DeBrincat is a top line player and Giroux is a superb play maker. The other two can carry Brassard for a bit if needed, at least until we get a few practices in and see what the alternatives might be

I think it would be disappointing if he didn't get an opportunity to showcase himself in a top6 role with Norris out but on the other hand the third line has been imperative for us getting wins so far. Not so clear cut on what I'd want, personally

Mostly agree, if Brass can slide into the 2C (where he's primarily played his entire career) and be a good stopgap while Norris is out that sounds ideal, but like I said above it's tough as a fan to not want to give Pinto all the opportunity possible and see what he can do with more skilled linemates flanking him despite the third line clicking so well. Will be interesting to see what DJ goes with
We're not in the give Pinto opportunity business, we're in the winning hockey games business

Why mess up multiple lines when Brassard easily slides in between DeBrincat and Giroux?
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,898
Visit site
I think it would be disappointing if he didn't get an opportunity to showcase himself in a top6 role with Norris out but on the other hand the third line has been imperative for us getting wins so far. Not so clear cut on what I'd want, personally

Mostly agree, if Brass can slide into the 2C (where he's primarily played his entire career) and be a good stopgap while Norris is out that sounds ideal, but like I said above it's tough as a fan to not want to give Pinto all the opportunity possible and see what he can do with more skilled linemates flanking him despite the third line clicking so well. Will be interesting to see what DJ goes with
The 'third line' has been better than the '2nd line' line all season. It simply doesn't make sense to change it right now. If a line struggles or goes stale sure do it. At even strength they have been playing just as much. This teams recent success has come because they can roll 4 lines, sustain zone time and stay on the oppositions D. You can't do that if you don't have depth. They break up that line and they probably lose the thing that has got them here. I find it strange that posters would prefer individual success over the teams. If Norris is out long term lines will be shuffled. Other players will get sick/injured etc. Seems like posters are concerned with slotting way too much. Just not how hockey works. Chemistry on a line is most important. Not all players have it and you need reps to develop it.
 

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,342
10,019
The 'third line' has been better than the '2nd line' line all season. It simply doesn't make sense to change it right now. If a line struggles or goes stale sure do it. At even strength they have been playing just as much. This teams recent success has come because they can roll 4 lines, sustain zone time and stay on the oppositions D. You can't do that if you don't have depth. They break up that line and they probably lose the thing that has got them here. I find it strange that posters would prefer individual success over the teams. If Norris is out long term lines will be shuffled. Other players will get sick/injured etc. Seems like posters are concerned with slotting way too much. Just not how hockey works. Chemistry on a line is most important. Not all players have it and you need reps to develop it.
I'm actually always concerned about slotting. I see guys get overslotted and then commentary in here on it lacking the context of being overslotted

Pinto is 22 games into an NHL career. He's doing fantastic in the role he is in and his line is outplaying his match ups. We don't need to screw with that by bumping him up. Not now anyway

The other angle is both Giroux and Brassard can play both wing and centre. There are a lot of 2nd lines out there worse than DeBrincat Giroux and Brassard, regardless of who plays C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bert

aragorn

Do The Right Thing
Aug 8, 2004
29,286
9,994
I would guess that DJ might give Brassard a shot at replacing Norris on the 2nd line with his buddy Giroux who he seems to have chemistry with & he has played a skilled role at C most of his career. If it clearly doesn't work than they have the luxury of giving Pinto a chance to see what he can do there, either way they change the lines in games quite quickly when things aren't working according to plan anyways.
 

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,657
10,869
10-1 now. Only 3 players with better odds.
I finally pulled the trigger yesterday. Put 100 down on Pinto at 15-1. I also dropped 20 on DJ for the Jack Adams figuring he’s got a great shot if we make the playoffs.
 

DaveMatthew

Bring in Peter
Apr 13, 2005
14,507
13,180
Ott
The 'third line' has been better than the '2nd line' line all season. It simply doesn't make sense to change it right now. If a line struggles or goes stale sure do it. At even strength they have been playing just as much. This teams recent success has come because they can roll 4 lines, sustain zone time and stay on the oppositions D. You can't do that if you don't have depth. They break up that line and they probably lose the thing that has got them here. I find it strange that posters would prefer individual success over the teams. If Norris is out long term lines will be shuffled. Other players will get sick/injured etc. Seems like posters are concerned with slotting way too much. Just not how hockey works. Chemistry on a line is most important. Not all players have it and you need reps to develop it.

And even if Brassard is on the 2nd line on paper, Pinto will get shifts with that group.

Norris was playing 19:00+ a night in the first 6 games. Brassard won't get all of that ice-time.

Pinto, has been getting ~14:30.

So my bet is Pinto bumps up to 16:00-17:00 a night and Brassard settles in at 15:00-16:00.
 

OD99

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
5,225
4,431
I finally pulled the trigger yesterday. Put 100 down on Pinto at 15-1. I also dropped 20 on DJ for the Jack Adams figuring he’s got a great shot if we make the playoffs.
Where are you guys using as your site?

I set-up Bet888 but it looks like they only do games, not futures.

Is there a, "best" site or they are all the same?
 

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,657
10,869
Where are you guys using as your site?

I set-up Bet888 but it looks like they only do games, not futures.

Is there a, "best" site or they are all the same?
Fanduel has Pinto at 15-1, ScoreBet has him at 10-1. Always shop futures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OD99

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,657
10,869
I just ran some numbers on a 20 man roster next year with Debrincat 9M, Zub 5M and Pinto 5M resigned along with Hamonic/replacement at 2.5M and a backup goalie at 2.0M.

Total Cap - 79,804,880
Total Cash - 78,112,500

We could do it if the Cap goes up to 86.5M but it would be tight considering dead money
 

Senovision

Registered User
May 23, 2011
2,922
1,976
He reminds me of Mike Bossy....not saying he will be Mike Bossy....as he was arguably the purest goal scorer to ever play in the NHL.

But Pinto has great hands and can really fire the puck with a quick release. He seems to be able to find open pockets on the ice. He also has the ability to waltz down the wing and rip it past the goalie with a cannonading drive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Alex1234

RickyLafleur

Fall of Pierre
Oct 17, 2013
3,119
2,117
Ottawa, ON
No way, they've won 3 in a row. They have been rolling 4 lines. That's why they've been good, fresh legs hard on the forcheck. Changing all the lines yuck.

Yeah lets not fix the 2nd line in order to keep the 3rd and 4th lines intact...what a big brain move. Pinto has already displayed chemistry with Giroux and Debrincat meanwhile Brassard hasn't played in someone's top 6 in nearly 7 years.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad