Toggle sidebar

Rumor: Seravalli: Rangers been all over JT Miller

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
This feels like the Canucks talking more than the Rangers actually being "all over" JT Miller. It'd be a good move. Rangers have NHL ready prospects they can move that aren't in the long term plans like Kravtsov and Lundkvist. A bit of stoking the fire to get other teams to up their offer on their quality prospects.
 
A lot of Rangers fans are pretending that they're making offers for the 17/18 version of Miller instead of the actual player he's actually developed into.

Miller @ 50% is likely one of the most attractive pieces available at the deadline this year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rotiman187, bh53, Belisarius and 3 others
Just A Bit Outside said:
Miller @ 50% for Schneider, Chytil + 2022 1st

Miller @ 50% represents almost the same cap hit as Chytil.
Click to expand...

Schneider isn't going anywhere. You can take Chytil and Jones/Lundqvist/Kravtsov, 2nd. We don't need you taking 50%.

Which is likely too low for Canuck fans, but that's my offer.
 
I loved Miller when he was a Ranger. Many fans did not like him too much and were flipping out every time he made a mistake or turnover. What are Vancouver needs/weaknesses and what position they got more than enough of?
 
Rangers aren't trading for a 1c. They're trading for a 2C or a 1RW.

If Rangers want to make a splash and only give up 1 main piece it'll most likely be Kakko. I don't see a bright future here and he'll be another teams problem. If Rangers want to give up a package it'll be a 1st, a prospect and player. But it won't be Schneider. It'll be Jones, Lunkvist or Roberston. Maybe Chytil or Kravtsov. Othmann has summer plans with us so he won't be included. Maybe Cuylle but I don't it. He's been real impressive. We aren't asking for 50% off.
 
Some Rangers fans still think they are dealing with Jim Benning. You are not getting a player of Miller's caliber at 5m/year without paying a steep price. Getting Miller would give you guys a very good chance of taking out Tampa and Florida in the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bh53
TGWL said:
Rangers aren't trading for a 1c. They're trading for a 2C or a 1RW.

If Rangers want to make a splash and only give up 1 main piece it'll most likely be Kakko. I don't see a bright future here and he'll be another teams problem. If Rangers want to give up a package it'll be a 1st, a prospect and player. But it won't be Schneider. It'll be Jones, Lunkvist or Roberston. Maybe Chytil or Kravtsov. Othmann has summer plans with us so he won't be included. Maybe Cuylle but I don't it. He's been real impressive. We aren't asking for 50% off.
Click to expand...

We can trade you 1 Brock Boeser for a reduced price:nod:
 
centipede2233 said:
The rangers and canucks make great trading partners, the rangers have the assets, it just comes down to negotiation
Click to expand...
Agree. We have too many assets that will never play for the team, cause we don't have spots available. But Miller isn't coming here to be the top guy. He's either taking Stromes spot or he's playing on wing with Zibby and Kreider. He's going to get less minutes. And statically he's not the best even strength point per 60 player, so Rangers are going to most likely see a slight degree in production if they can't give Miller as many minutes. I can see other teams beating out what we offer.
 
centipede2233 said:
The rangers and canucks make great trading partners, the rangers have the assets, it just comes down to negotiation
Click to expand...
Absolutely, But the value perception on here is way off from both sides.

Miller's Value is a 1st round draft pick, a high end young asset, and a Pick/depth player.
The guy is basically a PPG player, who plays 3 positions, a God in faceoffs, and on a good contract.
He is not a rental even.

3 1st rounders + Schneider is not realistic.
f***ing Lundkvist for Miller is not realistic. (Actually, it's not even remotely on the same earth)
 
  • Like
Reactions: bh53 and Nucklehead Supreme
egelband said:
Rangers don’t have any of those, unfortunately. I could see Lundkvist going to Vancouver but would probably need more than one-plus season of JT Miller. Unless Vancouver retains. That could be a deal. JTM @50% plus a 3rd for Lundkvist?
Click to expand...

Miller for a non top prospect.

And we retain half?

And we add a 3rd?

lmao?
 
mods need to close this its literally a pissing contest for who can make the worst offer from both sides with some reasonable offers sprinkled inbetween
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom