HuGort
Registered User
I am higher on Barlow than mostWouldn’t even do it for Barlow
I am higher on Barlow than mostWouldn’t even do it for Barlow
He's really not. Never has been. He has been negative (i.e. better than) compared to his teammates in GA/60 and xGA/60 twice in his entire career. And the times he has been negative in xGA/60, it was by 0.01 each season.Where the heck is this narrative that Monahan can't defend coming from? He's solid defensively.
If he stays healthy until the tdl, he's 100% returning a 1st round pick. He's the kind of player that teams love to get for a playoff run.
He plays all situations (pp, pk, ev), he's versatile (can play wing and center), he can play anywhere in the lineup (top 6 or bottom 6), he's great on faceoffs (6th in the nhl among players that have taken 400+ faceoffs), he's got loads of nhl experience, has leadership qualities, and he only has 2 M cap hit, which is extremely affordable.
I like the player, but he's just OK defensively. I've seen him miss assignments and cost us goals. That being said, he's also quite smart offensively, and those criticizing his lack of offense will be surprised when he puts up better numbers when playing with better offensive players, rather than the Habs middling middle six.Where the heck is this narrative that Monahan can't defend coming from? He's solid defensively.
If he stays healthy until the tdl, he's 100% returning a 1st round pick. He's the kind of player that teams love to get for a playoff run.
He plays all situations (pp, pk, ev), he's versatile (can play wing and center), he can play anywhere in the lineup (top 6 or bottom 6), he's great on faceoffs (6th in the nhl among players that have taken 400+ faceoffs), he's got loads of nhl experience, has leadership qualities, and he only has a 2 M cap hit, which is extremely affordable.
It's fascinating how there are offers of Montreal adding to get a 1st round prospect, or like this suggesting a 2nd and a prospect drafted in the 3d, and there are still many who just see it all as being completely out of line with reality... even though at the deadline 2nd round picks are basically handed out like candy...Monahan to the Jets?
I’d guess that the Habs would get their second back and a “B” type prospect. Maybe Zach Nehring? I think that’s probably fair value for both sides. Habs could use a big physical winger prospect with a decent scoring touch.
Probably from years of observation and defensive numbers that align with that conclusion?Where the heck is this narrative that Monahan can't defend coming from?
He would be 13th among Jets forwards at 5v5 p/60….
Lambert has essentially the same PPG in the AHL as Barlow has this year in the OHL...I am higher on Barlow than most
I'd add that if Monahan really is worth nothing more than a 4th rounder, it would follow that he won't be getting much of a contract for next season, so it becomes that much more likely the Habs re-sign him.There is no reason the Habs should trade Monahan for anything less then what they want. He's not expensive nor do the Habs need some long shot 2nd/3rd rounder when we have a ton of prospects already.
Chances are he's going to resign so this thread is a lot of noise over nothing.
Yeah, P/60 can be misleading since some players have much more ice time 5v5 than others.Winnipeg is 8th in goals for, Montreal is 27th. Do you think that could be a factor?
Also, Warren Foegele is ahead of Auston Matthews and Mitch Marner in terms of 5v5 P/60 so that should tell you how useful that stat is.
I keep thinking this as well. He'd fit really well in that forward groupAnother guy who could make sense for the Rangers.
Bad teams tend to produce bad results, so yes, it's likely a factor.Winnipeg is 8th in goals for, Montreal is 27th. Do you think that could be a factor?
Also, Warren Foegele is ahead of Auston Matthews and Mitch Marner in terms of 5v5 P/60 so that should tell you how useful that stat is.
Just like every player on the Habs “he’s great, if it wasn’t for the guys he’s playing with”.Both teams should aim higher. Jets should get a better player and if Habs can't do better than 2nd round value I'd rather just resign him. Lots of evaluation by stat watching on a guy who plays with complete offensive black holes, he's been nothing but a positive surprise since coming to Montreal
Lowry is our 3C.For real Monahan is not a top 6 in WPG but fans will love to have him as their 3rd C that can play PK and also PP, he is very good at everything but not great offensively, if my team gave up a 2nd and a B prospect for him I would be ok with it.
And Names does it 5 on 5. Half of Monahans poins come on the PP, which he wouldn’t get much time playing on the Jets.Well, by Habs fan reasoning exhibited in this thread, if Monahan is comparable to Lindholm because they are close in points this season, then Namestnikov is comparable to Monahan for the same reason…
Monahan: GP-39, G-10, A-13, Pts-23
Lindholm: GP-40, G-8, A-17, Pts-25
Namestnikov: GP-36, G-5, A-18, Pts-23
actually, Namestnikov has done it in fewer games, so I guess he’s better…
The only 2C the Habs have to offer is Suzuki.I don't know what's in Winipeg's water but they should do tests. Canadiens fans are known for overestimating the value of their players and I agree that we do that sometimes. But some Winipeg fans are on another planet….good luck in the playoff with your second center Namesnikov…
Monahan is on pace for less than fifty points while getting top six minutes. When Calgary moved Monahan into a bottom six role, he was useless. He's not the best skater, isn't physical, and is not great defensively.
I don't see Monahan as the type of player teams will look to attain for a playoff run. A guy like Domi had lots of jam, which Monahan doesn't have.
He's really not. Never has been. He has been negative (i.e. better than) compared to his teammates in GA/60 and xGA/60 twice in his entire career. And the times he has been negative in xGA/60, it was by 0.01 each season.
He's bad defensively. Always has been. This isn't new. He was a purely offensive scorer back in Calgary as well until he lost his top 6 position.
And he stopped being good at scoring as age an injuries happened.
Probably from years of observation and defensive numbers that align with that conclusion?
So I guess Caufield is the best defensive forward on the habs and he is having a Selke caliber season?
That's what the stats say...
So I guess Caufield is the best defensive forward on the habs and he is having a Selke caliber season?
That's what the stats say...
Well, by Habs fan reasoning exhibited in this thread, if Monahan is comparable to Lindholm because they are close in points this season, then Namestnikov is comparable to Monahan for the same reason…
Monahan: GP-39, G-10, A-13, Pts-23
Lindholm: GP-40, G-8, A-17, Pts-25
Namestnikov: GP-36, G-5, A-18, Pts-23
actually, Namestnikov has done it in fewer games, so I guess he’s better…
Surely you didn't stop reading after I mentioned GA/60 when the next word was "and"?