Rumor: San Jose trying to trade Evander Kane

Status
Not open for further replies.

al secord

Mustard Tiger
Jun 26, 2013
12,933
14,989
Toronto
Dude's declared bankruptcy, is being sued, is reportedly hated by his teammates, is having a public fight with his estranged wife and is getting investigated by the NHL for gambling on games.

Posting having dinner at a fancy restaurant seems really dumb and unnecessary.
He should have pulled his shades down over his eyes for you.
 

BigDaddyLurch

Have some PRIDE, Eric...
Mar 1, 2013
21,800
18,274
Principle's Office
He should have pulled his shades down over his eyes for you.
dealwithit.gif
 

DG93

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
4,797
2,981
San Jose
I honestly regret saying anything tbh..

Im only getting one (tiny) side of the story, but what Ill say is that Couture and Karlsson arent close, at all.. And Couture is firmly intent on staying put in SJ as the captain, has no desire to ever leave.

Paraphrasing here, but he thinks that at least a couple of players that hes called out for being checked out in some way last season (in specific guys from a small clique together opposite of Coutures side) have already cried to their agents - some of whom are shared by other players on the team - and they want out if possible, or Couture gone lol.

But I guess a lot of it has to do with Couture getting tough(er?) on guys last season. Some guys didnt respond well or agree with it, And there were some harsh words exchanged after some loses last season. And he feels like he has managements full backing on this, and will be the one left stranding if/when the axes fall. Again greatly paraphrasing this all from a second hand source (and it was well before anything Kane related came out).

So I have no idea who (if anyone) has asked for a real trade yet, or if people are just sour and moaning to one another (Couture included). But I would be really suprised is that was one of the happier and cohesive locker rooms in the NHL right now, based on what most of us can see to be obvious. Imo...

If you don't mind sharing, what kind of second-hand source are we talking here?
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,317
66,068
I.E.
I'm sure the usual folks will be here to point out that Kane is just misunderstood at every stop since Atlanta and that it's someone else's fault.


I’d get rid of them all. Kane for all the bullshit and the rest for letting it be an excuse to play like shit.

yep, every single one of them and every single coach should be cleansed. It also should include DW after the cleanse.

Yeah, if anyone uses this as an alibi, seems like the perfect excuse/reason to start a real purge. Especially with the upcoming drafts...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ducks DVM

DudeWhereIsMakar

Bergevin sent me an offer sheet
Apr 25, 2014
15,984
7,039
Winnipeg
Wonder if San Jose has the option to terminate him. No NHL will want to trade for him, maybe Arizona but other than that I doubt literally anybody wants him considering the whole Sharks team wants him gone just like the Winnipeg Jets team did.

But if they can't get a deal done I see Kane being assigned to the AHL or ECHL to whichever team is not affiliated with the Sharks. My guess is the Chicago Wolves or Norfolk Admirals (because they're not affiliated with anybody).
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,513
15,196
Folsom
Wonder if San Jose has the option to terminate him. No NHL will want to trade for him, maybe Arizona but other than that I doubt literally anybody wants him considering the whole Sharks team wants him gone just like the Winnipeg Jets team did.

But if they can't get a deal done I see Kane being assigned to the AHL or ECHL to whichever team is not affiliated with the Sharks. My guess is the Chicago Wolves or Norfolk Admirals (because they're not affiliated with anybody).

No team will take him especially not Arizona without it very heavily tilted in their favor. Something the Sharks are in no position to be doing because they don't have expendable future assets. The AHL avenue is the far more realistic option if termination is not an option for them. I tend to believe that they will go the termination route one way or the other.
 

LMFAO

Registered User
May 20, 2010
5,508
2,942
Wonder if San Jose has the option to terminate him. No NHL will want to trade for him, maybe Arizona but other than that I doubt literally anybody wants him considering the whole Sharks team wants him gone just like the Winnipeg Jets team did.

But if they can't get a deal done I see Kane being assigned to the AHL or ECHL to whichever team is not affiliated with the Sharks. My guess is the Chicago Wolves or Norfolk Admirals (because they're not affiliated with anybody).


Well if LA was able to terminate Mike Richards because he got caught with non prescribed painkillers I’m sure San Jose can find something to terminate Kane’s contract.
 

supsens

Registered User
Oct 6, 2013
6,577
2,001
Well if LA was able to terminate Mike Richards because he got caught with non prescribed painkillers I’m sure San Jose can find something to terminate Kane’s contract.

Drug smuggling across international borders vrs mad woman...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patty Ice

DudeWhereIsMakar

Bergevin sent me an offer sheet
Apr 25, 2014
15,984
7,039
Winnipeg
Well if LA was able to terminate Mike Richards because he got caught with non prescribed painkillers I’m sure San Jose can find something to terminate Kane’s contract.

The difference here is Evander Kane might be guilty of losing his games on purpose with gambling. Meaning he will no longer be on the payroll. Richards had a lawful case whereas it put him on the payroll until 2032.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,513
15,196
Folsom
The difference here is Evander Kane might be guilty of losing his games on purpose with gambling. Meaning he will no longer be on the payroll. Richards had a lawful case whereas it put him on the payroll until 2032.

Richards didn't really have a case. It was just in everyone's interest to settle.
 

serp

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
21,034
13,008
I still think it was stupid San Jose took Kane over Pavelski. I knew once that contract was signed there'd be trouble. If Pavelski had never left I believe the Sharks would still be a playoff team to this day.

That was Karlssons contract . Kane was signed the offseason before but i think it was noticeable that the Sharks fell apart after Pavelski left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nikolajs Sillers

Painful Quandary

Registered User
Mar 22, 2015
1,681
744
California
I still think it was stupid San Jose took Kane over Pavelski. I knew once that contract was signed there'd be trouble. If Pavelski had never left I believe the Sharks would still be a playoff team to this day.

The Sharks were not going to over Pavelski a third year on this contract, where as Dallas offered that third year. This is a common thing for the Sharks to do with 35 year-old and older players as they did not offer Marleau a third year (signed with Leafs) and Boyle a second year (signed with Rangers).
 

DollardStLaurent

Registered User
May 15, 2014
340
183
Don't know if this was already posted. If it was, I apologize.

Sharks GM Doug Wilson reportedly got complaints during the season from his players regarding Evander Kane.

“Guys were going into Doug’s office all year long,” according to a source for The Athletic, “saying Kane had to go. … All Doug would say is, ‘All teams have locker-room issues,’ which just isn’t true. Not the teams that win, anyway.” That meshes with a previous report that several Sharks players don't want Kane to return for the 2021-22 campaign. One reported issue with him is the "negative energy he brings into the room." Kane is also currently under investigation from the NHL following allegations that he bet on his own games and even threw them to win bets. Kane has denied those allegations.
SOURCE: The Athletic
Aug 12, 2021, 5:04 AM ET
 

serp

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
21,034
13,008
The Sharks were not going to over Pavelski a third year on this contract, where as Dallas offered that third year. This is a common thing for the Sharks to do with 35 year-old and older players as they did not offer Marleau a third year (signed with Leafs) and Boyle a second year (signed with Rangers).

They signed Karlsson , Burns , Vlasic and Coture to longterm contracts that run until they're in their as old or even older than Pavelski will be when his deal with the Stars expires after next season.
 

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
41,461
21,846
Heard a rumour from a source that I trust - Logan Couture is not a fan of Evander Kane, at all. Lol. Is what Ill say delicately. And hes got more opinions on the Sharks roster too..

Lol hilariously enough I heard in the same conversation that there is another EK on the Sharks that hes not particularly fond of, and wishes that the Sharks would part ways with him (which is apparently a mutual feeling thats not yet become public).

I guess Ive heard that Couture is a bit of a workaholic by nature, and hes not seeing the same level of effort from this particular player - and he was kindly told to pound sand when he tried to have a constructive chat with that player about his concerns...

I can tell you for absolute certain that the Sharks are a fractured mess inside the locker room right now, like 10 times worse than what the public actually knows about. There are factions within the room and lots of them. And unless they revert back into the old Sharks and breeze their way into the playoffs, ill be shocked if they havent traded one or more of their big name players.

Whos’ jumping in on those anchor contracts?
Sharks have some of the worst contracts in the league
 

Boud

Registered User
Dec 27, 2011
13,837
7,430
I don't think SJ can terminate his contract in any way and if they tried to do it the PA would be on their ass, I really don't see a scenario where they could do it. Kane has his share of issues but to terminate a contract there needs to be some concrete evidence that something illegal happened. The fact that Kane is in a messy divorce with his ex-wife is not illegal. If true, it's incredibly disappointing but you need way more than that to proceed with a termination.

The only way they would be able to proceed with it would be if they could prove that Kane gambled on NHL games but nothing has been proved so far. I anticipate Kane will need to be bought out unless the Sharks feel like he can stay on their roster despite the claim that his teammates aren't really happy with it.

It's a shame because he's a very good hockey player.

If SJ is about to lose Kane then I think it would be a great opportunity for them to stop playing and go full rebuild.
 

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
74,014
30,129
Wonder if San Jose has the option to terminate him. No NHL will want to trade for him, maybe Arizona but other than that I doubt literally anybody wants him considering the whole Sharks team wants him gone just like the Winnipeg Jets team did.

But if they can't get a deal done I see Kane being assigned to the AHL or ECHL to whichever team is not affiliated with the Sharks. My guess is the Chicago Wolves or Norfolk Admirals (because they're not affiliated with anybody).

They would have to have rock solid proof of the gambling allegations to terminate the contract, if they can't provide that ... you can't just terminate someone's contract because his teammates don't like him.

The NHLPA would cry bloody murder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mordoch

Painful Quandary

Registered User
Mar 22, 2015
1,681
744
California
They signed Karlsson , Burns , Vlasic and Coture to longterm contracts that run until they're in their as old or even older than Pavelski will be when his deal with the Stars expires after next season.

Those players were younger at the time of their signings. I am guessing Doug Wilson thought the team could still make the playoffs for a few years before age caught up with them. On top of that, Pavelski had an inflated shooting percentage that was being sustained by an aging Thornton. Unfortunately for Wilson, Martin Jones absolutely imploded, and the Vlasic contract was a day-one mistake. Wilson was talking about how a late-twenties Vlasic had untapped offensive potential, WTF. How those contracts really hurt the Sharks was costing them depth players like Donskoi and Nyquist, who was a good fit as a rental.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad