Maybe they already have the solution internally for 3rd C.
This is my thinking also and posted that on the Reaves thread. One thing you can say about JR is he does not just fill a need with a bandaid type approach. The examples I gave was when JR first got here he saw the team lacked a net front presence and toughness and he got one of the best in the game for that in Hornqvist. JR saw he needed to replace that shot of Neal on the Malkin line so he gets one of the best in Kessel. JR saw that Sullivan wanted to play a fast forechecking game when he took over as coach so he got the fastest skater in the game who is known as one of the best forcheckers. JR saw we had a need for a hard checking intimidating presence that could play a regular shift and he got the best in Reaves. I truely believe JR wanted Duchene or someone like him because he wants HBK type scoring and did not get that this year from Bonino. JR wants at least a 2C for that spot.
When JR hinted at adding center depth i wonder if Johnson is who he was talking about.
He wouldn't help the pens this year, but it adds depth to the organization.
Well he's listed as a LW, so probably not.
That always made sense to me because with the amount of games either Geno or Sid miss every year the 3rd center has to be 2nd line quality usually for weeks at a time. He wants to make it so if one of the big 2 centers get hurt it wont hurt like it would hurt if we had a jabroni backing them up if they should get hurt
The tweet the pens sent out said he played all forward positions, i dunno where the pens see him playing.
If only we trade for Jonathan Marchessault from Vegas. A guy can dream.
The tweet the pens sent out said he played all forward positions, i dunno where the pens see him playing.
I see. Well, he's probably not going to be an NHL center if he didn't play it exclusively in college, and he might not even be an AHL center. That's fine, but either way I doubt this guy has anything to do with the hole at C. Good depth though and could end up helping the 3rd or 4th line in a pinch this year or next.
I think in Sheary's case, it makes some sense. In Dumoulin's case I don't think it does. Sheary has nothing to lose really. His case is good, but it has huge holes in it. The reason why Sheary is smart seeing it t hrough is an arbitration is very statistics orientated, and when you look at his stats, he's a pretty productive player.
On the flip side, if you look at Dumoulin's stats, probably not a real productive player on paper, but when you watch him play, he's a tremendously productive player. Dumoulin is getting paid either way. The Pens are going to try to squeeze Sheary.
I'd personally trade Sheary. I don't see the point of him here long term, and what happened in the playoffs with him is exactly what I feared would happen.
53 points in 61 games with no 1st PP time, i'd say that's proven.
The tweet the pens sent out said he played all forward positions, i dunno where the pens see him playing.
If only we trade for Jonathan Marchessault from Vegas. A guy can dream.
Yea he's been someone I've been eyeballing forever.
Marchessault for DP51??
Liked Marchy ever since his tampa days. At 750k and a player who can play wing and Centre, he would be a nice get. But it would be for only one year as he will cash in. So i wouldn't give up Sheary for him. Throw a few picks at Vegas. But i don't see them trading him. They need a few good players.
Makes sense. Until the Dumoulin & Sheary deals get done JR wont know for sure how much cap room he has to play with.but they need to have the Dumoulin and Sheary deals done before they can commit.
I think you have the right of it. I really don't want to pay Sheary like he's a 70 point player with term, and I doubt JR does either. I don't think his playoff struggles are temporary, no matter how gangbusters he is in the regular season. He's a guy I'd be open to moving for a young, impact 3C.Are they trying to squeeze him? What if they just have very big differences on what's fair? What if Sheary is looking at his 70pt pace and looking for 3.75-4.5m on a 2-3 year deal while Pittsburgh is looking at him at 3m on a 1 yr deal?
Occam's razor: The simplest answer is often the most likely one.
The Pens had hoped they could finalize contracts with Dumoulin and Sheary prior to making a trade for a center. They know what's being asked in the deal, but they need to have the Dumoulin and Sheary deals done before they can commit.
That's why Rutherford has said he's had multiple talks, why a trade is most likely, and why he said deals are on hold unless something changes with one of the teams he's talked to.
Once Dumoulin and Sheary sign, I bet a few things fall into place.