It isn't really even the fact that Reaves is not a solid player. It is just like.. we could potentially have Rust as our 4th line RW if Sprong steps into the 3rd line role and impresses.
I don't think it's worth moving Rust to the 4th line if Sprong impresses. Even if we had a center capable of working with him (which I doubt), I'd like to see him get more than 8-11 minutes of icetime a game.
That's one of the reasons why Reaves doesn't bother me all that much (my joy for having someone like him aside). I do not see our 4th line producing anything like what they did last year. I think all will be around 15-20 pts, simply because they'll get more OZ starts, but without Cullen there, it's going to be rough compared to last year. So I don't see having to dress Reaves as something that's going to make all that much of a difference in the grande scheme of things.
And we'd have Kostin. And still have Sundqvist who was improving. Not like he was stagnating like DP. The trade really made no sense, since he isn't a clear upgrade over anybody and he is more expensive than a Kuhn, Rowney or Archibald. That's 3 RWs alone who are capable of bringing NHL play, and that's not including Sprong,ZAR or Johnson. I don't get why the pens thought they needed ANOTHER 4th line RW who isn't even an upgrade.
You could've even have used the 1st towards a centre or Dman. Like Scandella or something.
Jesus.... where to start.
A) No, we probably wouldn't have Kostin. Him being drafted at that spot doesn't mean all that much unless you think Rutherford would have actually drafted him. And while Sundqvist was likely still improving, he showed next to nothing last year that he's ready for a full time spot. Which means keeping him doesn't do much for us, as we still have a hole that we would need filled.
B) Reaves is a better hockey player then Kuhnhackl, Archibald and Rowney. They (to varying degree's) might have more potential at becoming better, but right now, out of those 4, Reaves is the best one.
C) If you had moved that pick for a player, then you couldn't have picked Kostin or whomever now could you? If you're going to ***** about trading it, you can't then propose to trade it.
But on a serious note, no we couldn't have traded for Scandella. He carries a 4m cap hit, and he would require a couple moves just to free up cap space to make it happen. Very unrealistic.