Speculation: Sabres Roster Speculation - Pre-season 2023 Edition

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

GellMann

Registered User
Dec 16, 2014
4,314
3,837
Lancaster NY
i know we shouldnt be petty but i got told in week 2 thast edm wasnt a contender
Somehow I very much believe that if the Sabres had started the year with their bottom six, defense corps, and goalies we'd have finished last easily. Their roster looked putrid, but McDavid just makes everyone score I guess
 

Push Dr Tracksuit

Gerstmann 3:16
Jun 9, 2012
13,408
3,623
Somehow I very much believe that if the Sabres had started the year with their bottom six, defense corps, and goalies we'd have finished last easily. Their roster looked putrid, but McDavid just makes everyone score I guess
well when you take the worst part of a teams roster

you arent making the playoffs with our bottom 6 goaltender and bottom D

and ya mcdavid is something else
 

GellMann

Registered User
Dec 16, 2014
4,314
3,837
Lancaster NY
well when you take the worst part of a teams roster

you arent making the playoffs with our bottom 6 goaltender and bottom D

and ya mcdavid is something else
I mean, if you swapped ours out with theirs

Skinner - Tage - Tuch
kid line
Edmonton bottom 6

Edmonton D
Edmonton goalies

If you had given me that lineup before the season I would have barfed and said we are tanking for bedard
 

Push Dr Tracksuit

Gerstmann 3:16
Jun 9, 2012
13,408
3,623
I mean, if you swapped ours out with theirs

Skinner - Tage - Tuch
kid line
Edmonton bottom 6

Edmonton D
Edmonton goalies

If you had given me that lineup before the season I would have barfed and said we are tanking for bedard
yes

if you take the worst part of edmontons roster, cut it off from mcdavid and draisaitl, its going to suck

pick any team that doesnt have 2 power house offensive lines

look at the roster you made you took the best part of edmontons roster and got rid of it, then took the best part of buffalos roster and got rid of it, are you surprised whats left is bad?
 

Dingo44

We already won the trade
Sponsor
Jul 21, 2015
11,467
13,821
Greensboro, NC
Looks like Jost and Quinn are hanging out in Hilton Head
Screenshot_20230418_013649_Instagram.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Club

joshjull

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
79,203
41,760
Hamburg,NY
Cool, now do Fox.

Fox's 7 year $9.5M per extension bought 4 UFA years.

Fox also had multiple top 5 Norris seasons (including a Norris Trophy win) when he signed his deal, whereas Dahlin will likely have one (finish TBD obv).
No he didn’t

Fox only played one “normal” NHL season (his rookie season) that ended a bit early bit due to Covid. The he played in the Covid shortened one with the bastardized schedule before signing his extension.

Dahlin will have a season and a half of playing at a very high level when he signs this summer. Thats more than Fox had under his belt.** Plus Dahlin will have done all of that during normal NHL seasons. Fox only played against 7 NHL teams the year he won the Norris. We were one of them.

Fox signed his ELC at age 21 and did the following prior to his extension.

19-20 -> 70gms 42pts (rookie year)
20-21 -> 55gms 47pts (wins Norris)

Dahlin at the same age/year of development as Fox was in those two seasons.

21-22 -> 80gms - 53pts
22-23 -> 78gms - 73pts

Dahlin started in the NHL at 18 and I think we forget how young he still is. Fox was a rookie in his D+4 season. Dahlin already had 3 NHL seasons (197gms) under his belt before he started his D+4 season.

**I don’t think Fox winning the Norris in that bastardized Covid season will matter much in contract talks. Fox produced 30 of his 47pts (64%) that year in 24gms vs the worst 3 teams in that division (Us, Flyers and Devils). Fox really feasted on us with 12pts in 8gms (25% of his total). Dahlin got his points grinding it out over a full NHL season.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rowley Birkin

Dirty Dog

Wooftastic
Sponsor
Jul 11, 2013
11,918
14,610
The doghouse
Makar's team spends to the cap and makes the playoffs every year.

You’re going to have to stop making things up if you want people to take you seriously. Because no they didn’t. When they were rebuilding and had ELCs, they were way under the cap. Oh, and that’s when MacKinnon signed his sweetheart deal. So, you’re wrong there too.
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,240
38,943
Rochester, NY
No he didn’t

Fox only played one “normal” NHL season (his rookie season) that ended a bit early bit due to Covid. The he played in the Covid shortened one with the bastardized schedule before signing his extension.

Dahlin will have a season and a half of playing at a very high level when he signs this summer. Thats more than Fox had under his belt.** Plus Dahlin will have done all of that during normal NHL seasons. Fox only played against 7 NHL teams the year he won the Norris. We were one of them.

Fox signed his ELC at age 21 and did the following prior to his extension.

19-20 -> 70gms 42pts (rookie year)
20-21 -> 55gms 47pts (wins Norris)

Dahlin at the same age/year of development as Fox was in those two seasons.

21-22 -> 80gms - 53pts
22-23 -> 78gms - 73pts

Dahlin started in the NHL at 18 and I think we forget how young he still is. Fox was a rookie in his D+4 season. Dahlin already had 3 NHL seasons (197gms) under his belt before he started his D+4 season.

**I don’t think Fox winning the Norris in that bastardized Covid season will matter much in contract talks. Fox produced 30 of his 47pts (64%) that year in 24gms vs the worst 3 teams in that division (Us, Flyers and Devils). Fox really feasted on us with 12pts in 8gms (25% of his total). Dahlin got his points grinding it out over a full NHL season.
I know you have consistently tried to discount the COVID impacted seasons and consistently argue that they should not be used for any sort of player evaluation or contract projections.

But, that is not the reality that agents and GMs are operating within.

Fox winning the Norris Trophy in 2020-21 absolutely played a huge part in the 7 year $9.5M AAV extension the Rangers signed him to on 11/1/2021. He backed that up with a 5th place Norris season last year and a similar season this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhereAreTheCookies

GellMann

Registered User
Dec 16, 2014
4,314
3,837
Lancaster NY
yes

if you take the worst part of edmontons roster, cut it off from mcdavid and draisaitl, its going to suck

pick any team that doesnt have 2 power house offensive lines

look at the roster you made you took the best part of edmontons roster and got rid of it, then took the best part of buffalos roster and got rid of it, are you surprised whats left is bad?
Well yes that's the point lol. Some teams have good defenses, bottom sixes, and goalies. My point was that before the season Edmonton looked like theirs were bottom 2-3 of the league if you did the same thing for every team and compared them

but then they went out and had a pretty good year behind mcdavid
 

RefsIdeas

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 2, 2011
1,537
1,272
With the talk about Levi potentially getting the starters load (45ish games) I wanted to post this. There have been 16 age 21 goalies that have played in the NHL for more than 10 games and posted a .900 or better. If we want to see if there are any comparables for 41 games or more, there are 8 total in NHL history. Betting on Levi to do this, as good as he is, would be a top 1% outcome.

Screenshot 2023-04-18 091112.png
 

WhereAreTheCookies

Registered User
Feb 16, 2022
3,237
5,522
Top Shelf
With the talk about Levi potentially getting the starters load (45ish games) I wanted to post this. There have been 16 age 21 goalies that have played in the NHL for more than 10 games and posted a .900 or better. If we want to see if there are any comparables for 41 games or more, there are 8 total in NHL history. Betting on Levi to do this, as good as he is, would be a top 1% outcome.

View attachment 690744
He turns 22 in December, curious if that marks any significant increase over age 21.
 

Mattilaus

Registered User
Sep 12, 2014
7,555
6,133
Beyond the Wall
With the talk about Levi potentially getting the starters load (45ish games) I wanted to post this. There have been 16 age 21 goalies that have played in the NHL for more than 10 games and posted a .900 or better. If we want to see if there are any comparables for 41 games or more, there are 8 total in NHL history. Betting on Levi to do this, as good as he is, would be a top 1% outcome.

View attachment 690744
I largely agree, It is kind of funny however that #1 is the goalie he is most often compared to.
 

RefsIdeas

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 2, 2011
1,537
1,272
He turns 22 in December, curious if that marks any significant increase over age 21.
Total of 58 who played 20 games or more, 24 goalies who started 41 games or more (with .900 or better). So a fair increase. I'm not sure if they use the age cut-off for their age at the beginning of the season or the age by Dec 31
 
Last edited:

Dirty Dog

Wooftastic
Sponsor
Jul 11, 2013
11,918
14,610
The doghouse
With the talk about Levi potentially getting the starters load (45ish games) I wanted to post this. There have been 16 age 21 goalies that have played in the NHL for more than 10 games and posted a .900 or better. If we want to see if there are any comparables for 41 games or more, there are 8 total in NHL history. Betting on Levi to do this, as good as he is, would be a top 1% outcome.

View attachment 690744

Interesting. How many had below a .900 save percentage?
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,240
38,943
Rochester, NY
He turns 22 in December, curious if that marks any significant increase over age 21.
Since 2000, there have been 17 seasons (and only 4 in the last decade) by a goalie that is 21 or 22 that have a Save% of .900 or better over 40+ GP:

PLAYERSEASONAGETEAMGPGAASV%WLTSOTOI
Tuukka Rask2009-2010
22​
Boston Bruins
45​
1.97​
0.931​
22​
12​
5​
5​
2562​
Matt Murray2016-2017
22​
Pittsburgh Penguins
49​
2.41​
0.923​
32​
10​
4​
4​
2766​
Roberto Luongo2000-2001
21​
Florida Panthers
47​
2.44​
0.92​
12​
24​
7​
5​
2628​
John Gibson2015-2016
22​
Anaheim Ducks
40​
2.07​
0.92​
21​
13​
4​
4​
2295​
Andrei Vasilevsky2016-2017
22​
Tampa Bay Lightning
50​
2.61​
0.917​
23​
17​
7​
2​
2831​
Roberto Luongo2001-2002
22​
Florida Panthers
58​
2.77​
0.915​
16​
33​
4​
4​
3030​
Sergei Bobrovski2010-2011
22​
Philadelphia Flyers
54​
2.59​
0.915​
28​
13​
8​
0​
3017​
Jonathan Quick2008-2009
22​
Los Angeles Kings
44​
2.48​
0.914​
21​
18​
2​
4​
2495​
Michal Neuvirth2010-2011
22​
Washington Capitals
48​
2.45​
0.914​
27​
12​
4​
4​
2689​
Carter Hart2019-2020
21​
Philadelphia Flyers
43​
2.42​
0.914​
24​
13​
3​
1​
2356​
Carey Price2009-2010
22​
Montréal Canadiens
41​
2.77​
0.912​
13​
20​
5​
0​
2358​
Rick DiPietro2003-2004
22​
New York Islanders
50​
2.36​
0.911​
23​
18​
5​
5​
2844​
Ondrej Pavelec2009-2010
22​
Atlanta Thrashers
42​
3.29​
0.906​
14​
18​
7​
2​
2317​
Marc-André Fleury2006-2007
22​
Pittsburgh Penguins
67​
2.83​
0.906​
40​
16​
9​
5​
3905​
Carey Price2008-2009
21​
Montréal Canadiens
52​
2.83​
0.905​
23​
16​
10​
1​
3036​
Steve Mason2009-2010
21​
Columbus Blue Jackets
58​
3.05​
0.901​
20​
26​
9​
5​
3201​
Steve Mason2010-2011
22​
Columbus Blue Jackets
54​
3.03​
0.901​
24​
21​
7​
3​
3027​
 
Last edited:

joshjull

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
79,203
41,760
Hamburg,NY
I know you have consistently tried to discount the COVID impacted seasons and consistently argue that they should not be used for any sort of player evaluation or contract projections.

But, that is not the reality that agents and GMs are operating within.

Fox winning the Norris Trophy in 2020-21 absolutely played a huge part in the 7 year $9.5M AAV extension the Rangers signed him to on 11/1/2021. He backed that up with a 5th place Norris season last year and a similar season this season.

You were wrong about Fox being involved in multiple Norris races prior to signing his extension. Changing the subject to my opinion of that Covid season (and mischaracterizing it) doesn’t change that. You also misunderstood what I was saying about Fox winning the Norris. I’m saying it will have no impact on Dahlin’s contract. Not that it didn’t help Fox with his.

Lets look at their respective resumes from their drafting to the end of their D+5 seasons.

D+1 thru D+3

*Fox was in college
*Dahlin was in NHL…
D+1 -> 82gms 44pt/
D+2 -> 59gms 40pt (56pts pace)
D+3 -> 56gms 23pt (34pt pace/Covid schedule .

D+4 season

*Fox in NHL -> 70gms 40pts (47pt pace)(rookie season)
*Dahlin NHL -> 80gms 53pts

Dahlin was slightly better

D+5 season

*Fox ——> 55gms 47pts (70pt pace)/Covid schedule/Norris win
*Dahlin -> 78gms 73pts (77pt pace)

Dahlin was better than Fox. He produced at a slightly better pace for a full season (23 more games). Factor in the nature of the season Fox played in and Dahlin‘s year looks even better.

Fox winning the Norris that season is not going hurt Dahlin’s contract position at all. If it plays any role, it could be used as a chip by his agents in his favor. That he outproduced a Norris winner at the same age.
 

Matt Ress

Don't sleep on me
Aug 5, 2014
5,503
3,201
Appalachia
Some big trades being discussed on the mains. I think Adams will get the best value defender for the least amount of assets. A defensive #4 shouldn't really be too expensive anyway. Who knows what happens in net.

I'd be surprised if the 1st or top 3 prospects get moved at this point. Maybe after a playoff dive next summer.
 

TehDoak

Chili that wants to be here
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
32,091
9,345
Will fix everything
My plan for offseason has slowly morphed into:

f*** the Bruins

Like Bill Murray in Rushmore, I'm taking dead aim at the rich boys



Swayman? Offersheet.

UFAs. Give me Nosek (59% on faceoffs this year). Give me Clifton. Throw in Hathaway for good measure. Let's start Boston Bruins survivor support group over here.

You going to sign away Ullmark? You going to tell Taylor Hall to only accept a trade there?

The bill has come due, f***heads.
 

dkollidas

Registered User
Nov 18, 2010
3,882
581
I've loved Tanev since he got to Vancouver (go go UDFA collegians who work out!) but there is certainly the risks there of his typical health (he's giving a team about 60-ish games) and his age. And his contract control.

I go back and forth on Markstrom. His first year in Calgary he struggled a bit, his second he was great, then this year he was a mess. And it's not like Sutter doesn't harp on structured defense so I'm leery of what a guy who likes structured defense would do in the chaos of Sabres' d-zone mayhem.
Also I doubt a guy like Tanev is waiving his trade protection to come not only to the east coast, but specifically to Buffalo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: elchud
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad