shut the f*** up Dreger
He didn’t get a lot of OZ starts either. Samuelsson is much better, you won’t find an argument from me there. I just don’t like picking one stat and saying that the analytics guys wouldn’t like somebody, there’s a boatload of context needed to apply in each situation.Schneider was a third pairing guy who did not get a heavy dose of DZone starts. I don't know that he drew tougher assignments.
shut the f*** up Dreger
The incentive is that as all of the core guys age into their next contract, they get the value of having the space to afford one more of them. Thinking that they'll just have someone who advocates for Buffalo as hard as Dahlin does then has soak up cap just because it's there seems flawed.
Dahlin isn't getting significantly more than guys like Makar and Fox who have the hardware. This conversation is giving me flashbacks to the Eichel extension when people were cool with him being paid in 13.33% of the cap without having done things to actually be worth that. Dahlin's had growth and should remain a great player, but he's not kicking down the door better than Fox or Makar.
Who is picking one stat? I was looking at a variety of stats and they all made me guess that Ventura and crew would be unlikely to be pounding the table for the guy.He didn’t get a lot of OZ starts either. Samuelsson is much better, you won’t find an argument from me there. I just don’t like picking one stat and saying that the analytics guys wouldn’t like somebody, there’s a boatload of context needed to apply in each situation.
Cool, now do Fox.Roster thread: Get To Work (2022-2023 Season)
(On a very special episode of Beyond Blue and Gold) "Ahem...Kevyn? It says here on The Internet that the fans want to see your balls" And they better be big!forums.hfboards.com
There are numerous reasons to suggest that Dahlin will get paid more than Makar did.
what else did they do that Dahlin didn’t? I know you know this. How old will they be when they get their next contract? How old will Dahlin be if he signs the same term as them?
what would they make if they took a 3 year bridge deal first for 6 per?
Many of the same points would apply here too:Cool, now do Fox.
Fox's 7 year $9.5M per extension bought 4 UFA years.
Fox also had multiple top 5 Norris seasons (including a Norris Trophy win) when he signed his deal, whereas Dahlin will likely have one (finish TBD obv).
I thought he was one of their untouchables. Future Norris winner, and bluest of blue chips? Wonder what happened that he is suddenly expendable given he has a number of years of team control still.Rangers fans offered up Braden Schneider as a RHD possibility on the trade board. That's be an ideal fit.
I thought he was one of their untouchables. Future Norris winner, and bluest of blue chips? Wonder what happened that he is suddenly expendable given he has a number of years of team control still.
In a cap crunch him being on an ELC for another year should make him a guy they keep.Cap crunch, mostly.
I thought he was one of their untouchables. Future Norris winner, and bluest of blue chips? Wonder what happened that he is suddenly expendable given he has a number of years of team control still.
The contract kicking in down the road rarely inflates the salary a player gets. It is usually all about when the contract is signed. That is why teams want to lock guys up sooner rather than later.Many of the same points would apply here too:
- Fox kicked in 2022/23 while Dahlin would kick in 2024/25 - Dahlin's extension would be effective 2 years later & finish 3 years later
- Fox's extension bought 4 UFA years, an 8 year Dahlin extension would buy seven UFA years (after seven accrued seasons)
- Dahlin's third contract, Fox's second contract
As we saw with Kravtsov, even the bluest of blue chips are able to be traded.I thought he was one of their untouchables. Future Norris winner, and bluest of blue chips? Wonder what happened that he is suddenly expendable given he has a number of years of team control still.
Point one - if you're splitting hairs then Fox's deal was signed in 2021 while Dahlin's is (hopefully) 2023. That's two years difference. Add the extra year & it's three years duration where the cap is going to be higher, three years further away from C19.The contract kicking in down the road rarely inflates the salary a player gets. It is usually all about when the contract is signed. That is why teams want to lock guys up sooner rather than later.
The second vs third contract doesn't usually matter much, either.
The difference in UFA years is the big factor. And my guess is that Fox's stronger resume at the time the contracts will have been signed levels that out.
It will be really interesting to see how the Norris voting plays out. That will likely have a greater than 0% effect on the contract talks. I bet the narrative is very different if he wins versus if he finishes 2nd or 3rd and gets to go to the NHL Awards, versus if he finishes 4+ and is not a "finalist".
Sorry, it seemed like you filtered by xgf% and was using that to drive your argument, if that's not the case then it's all good!Who is picking one stat? I was looking at a variety of stats and they all made me guess that Ventura and crew would be unlikely to be pounding the table for the guy.
Would be nice if we could fill this need from within, but now sure who among our young players can fill that role.Based on Dorion's post-season presser, we will (again) be in competition with the Sens for a goaltender and bottom-6 PKers.
Well the difference is Adams actually said he wants the extension done. You're going off reading in between the lines based on Dahlin's interview.I know Adams has said signing Dahlin is a priority, but I have heard zero interest from Dahlin to get a deal completed asap.
Am I the only one that thinks Dahlin does not sign an extension this summer, but waits until 2024 - at least until the new cap predictions are released by the league?
There is a history there of long negotiations. By all accounts, he seems to be a player who bets on himself going forward. Most agents will be advising their 2024 FA clients to wait until the league releases their 2024-25 cap estimates to start negotiations.
I'd love to see Dahlin signed to an 8 year extension this offseason, but it feels like wishful thinking on Adams' part more than the done deal attitude I am reading in this thread. Have I missed some important relevant information on this topic?
*note* this is not a pessimistic post implying he won't sign long-term in Buffalo. I think he signs an 8 year deal eventually. I just don't think it happens this offseason.
NopeFun idea for the day:
Send two offer sheets to the Bruins:
1 year, 2M for Bussi
2 year, 4.1M per for Swayman
Total cost if they don't match either: 2nd and a 3rd
f***ing up the Bruins goaltending:
Priceless.