Damn, if Doak is out on his idea after beating the goalie drum nonstop for 2 years .. maybe I’m wrong?
View attachment 708820
We constantly argue against Doak because no one thinks Doak’s reasons for his opinions on Adams and the state of ownership are grounded in reality and factual evidence. They’re theories that while not supported by evidence can be seen as also not made impossible by evidence. Like when Doak says things like, I’m just able to see things in Adams words you can’t, not a quote but a summary from memory of a previous post. To the contrary, Doak disagreeing with you is a stamp of approval that at least you’re using different levels of reasoning. But we should never stereotype a post or poster because that doesn’t encourage improvement. Treat all people like Donny Granato would, don’t restrain their creativity but continue providing them with opportunities to learn and grow.
Like in this case, we can all agree that paying a goalie 6x9.5 is an insane idea regardless of what TSN is writing about. Check positive for Doak.
So we can assume either the tsn writer or CH agent is off in their estimates. If we look at goalie salaries across the league, I personally think 9.5 is a bit out there because all the comparables are negative. There isn’t a goalie on the list making over 6mil that isn’t overpaid badly and almost everyone is disastrously overpaid. So you’re limited now to teams with bad GMs and how many of those teams are both looking for and have the cap space to add 9.5mil for a FA goalie, ehh number might be zero but no more than 1 or 2. Personally I think it’s tough call, but is 7.5 still too much? Is shestys 6 too little? Either way I think it’s probably too much money to keep CH into his next contract. So I’d call him a rental as well.
Finally, is it actually too much to acquire CH as a rental? Honestly the teams I’d be most worried about blowing the fat wad on CH already blew said wads on rentals this off-season. Which leads me to rentals are expensive and Buffalo has an edge in still having this years pick and a deep prospect pool.
So, I’m forced to conclude that, yes in this case I think my position ends up being, if they acquired him I don’t think it’s the worst thing in the world because the Sabres could absorb that type of expensive both in terms of picks and prospects but I don’t think id do it because of the cost of acquisition and the cost of retention versus buffalos time line and other needs.
If I’m the leafs I do it all day everyday and twice on league holidays. As the Sabres, nothing is so important about next season to make it worth the cost. Well analyzed by Doak. I’m coming back up to hit the like and subscribe button.
However, I’m then unliking because Doak says it both makes no sense and then explains how Doak both sees a way it makes sense and wouldn’t be opposed to it, and that, doesn’t make sense.