Toggle sidebar

Speculation: Sabres Roster Speculation - Pre-season 2023 Edition

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Reader mode
MOGlLNY said:
I would much prefer Saros but it really doesn't seem like Nashville will be keen to move him this off-season.
Click to expand...
And Saros would be a great option. I would prefer any reliable and proven goaltenderr who can play at least 40 games in a season. But there doesn't seem to be many options. And I'm not at all confident in our current goalier. I believe in Levi in the future, but I don't believe in Comrie and UPL.
 
Ace said:
I mean…to be fair…Russo has about the best track record there is in this business and if Adams does talk to someone about something…there’s a decent chance the other side of the phone call isn’t as quiet as Adams
Click to expand...
Duhatshek is an NHL writer with previous experience covering the Flames. He had no rumors of note about the Sabres from around the trade deadline.

Russo covers the Wild and the NHL and rarely has Sabres rumors. And he didn't seem to be linking Greenway to the Sabres much before it happened.
 
Ace said:
The problem isn’t the player it’s the cost of acquiring him while having one year left. I’d be happy to extend him. Would they? Would he? Boston rolled out two great goalies and set a record. We could do that for a few years and I’d be happy to develop Levi alongside a stud goalie. But the risk of paying quality assets for maybe one year is a lot to ask
Click to expand...
Out of curiosity I checked Evolving Hockey. They have a Hellebuyck extension listed as (with percentage likelihood):

8x$9.064M (30%)
7x$8.718M (25%)
6x$8.480M (16%)
5x$8.214M (16%)

I’d do 5 years; not sure I’d be comfortable doing any more that that. And committing $8 million for that term with Levi in the hopper…just not convinced that’s a good idea. And I don’t think he’d take less term without testing the UFA market.
 
Fjordy said:
Well we have 2024 1st, 2nd, prospects. Although I'm not so keen on this choice. If we can get a goalie of this level for at least one year (maybe more) + DeMelo could be conditional, I'm all for it.
Click to expand...
Except this goalie needs anew contract in 1 year - those goalies don't move for high 1sts unless they have a contract agreed to. No way sabres are taking on a 1 year goalie - or paying one 9 mil a year for the next 7 years after that with Levi in the coffer
 
My Cozen Dylan said:
Out of curiosity I checked Evolving Hockey. They have a Hellebuyck extension listed as (with percentage likelihood):

8x$9.064M (30%)
7x$8.718M (25%)
6x$8.480M (16%)
5x$8.214M (16%)

I’d do 5 years; not sure I’d be comfortable doing any more that that. And committing $8 million for that term with Levi in the hopper…just not convinced that’s a good idea. And I don’t think he’d take less term without testing the UFA market.
Click to expand...
I would be shocked if Adams trades for him and gives him 5x$8.2M.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BUCKSHOT, Zman5778 and My Cozen Dylan
Agents to Insiders, Just mention the Sabre's to stir the market on a upcoming available player (lots of cap, need etc.), or to help get my client out of that market :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheMistyStranger
I can't describe how useless that 13OA (and the inevitable fancy-pants forward it will bring) are to this roster. It means a whole hell of a lot more to Winnipeg. They will be bleeding top-end talent for a couple of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Push Dr Tracksuit
We just watched a 40+ year old be the only decent goalie on the roster for two seasons and people are worried about a goalie turning 32 while under contract. Amazing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fjordy
This isn’t a point about goalie so much as the whole roster…but there is way too much “well…any D they acquire has to be 24 or younger to fit our timeline” talk around here. No. They have plenty of young players with even younger players behind them. They need fully formed steady quality players to compliment those players and replace guys who are walking mistakes. So and so player will be 31 when his contract ends! …. So? Power doesn’t need a developing player to play with. He needs a quality one. Not every player on the team has to be here in 2028.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fezzy126, My Cozen Dylan, Diaspora and 5 others
Jim Bob said:



I would not be thrilled to have Helley signed for big money for 6 years that will be the majority of his 30s with Levi waiting in the wings.

They need a 2-3 year bridge goalie and not a 6 year guy.
Click to expand...

5x8.2 was the description, yes? I wouldn't offer more than five years.

If you need to move him after three years, send him out west for a 2nd and retain on him if you need to. Assuming he earns his keep, it's well worth the pick to get him in here now.

We're in a new phase. It's win-now without any desperation.
 
Diaspora said:
5x8.2 was the description, yes? I wouldn't offer more than five years.

If you need to move him after three years, send him out west for a 2nd and retain on him if you need to. Assuming he earns his keep, it's well worth the pick to get him in here now.

We're in a new phase. It's win-now without any desperation.
Click to expand...
He is under contract for 23-24. A 5 year extension would start after this season. Thus Helley would be under contract with the Sabres for 6 seasons.

With all the talk about not blocking prospects and how in love Adams seems to be with Levi, I just don't see how it all fits together.

Adams has not talked about being in win now mode. And trading for Helley and giving him a big extension before he plays a single game sure seems like a desperation move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Irie, Matt Ress, CaliSabresfan24 and 2 others
KrakenSabresMike said:
Except this goalie needs anew contract in 1 year - those goalies don't move for high 1sts unless they have a contract agreed to. No way sabres are taking on a 1 year goalie - or paying one 9 mil a year for the next 7 years after that with Levi in the coffer
Click to expand...
The cap structure gets really dicey when you put that together with an extended Helley too. It reduces what you can reasonably spend on an upgrade to partner with Power and still have a reasonable amount of cap to spend on all the other players who will need new deals after next season and the following year. At 6 he works, at 8+ he becomes a bit of a cap issue.
 
Ace said:
We just watched a 40+ year old be the only decent goalie on the roster for two seasons and people are worried about a goalie turning 32 while under contract. Amazing.
Click to expand...
Who are these people worried about him being 32? I saw 1 poster mention him being signed through a majority of his 30's. Most have discussed the contract implications long term, not his age. At this point it's like you're TRYING to find something to take issue with.

Paying him 8+ long term could present some cap issues, especially if Levi is as good as advertised.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Irie
WhereAreTheCookies said:
especially if Levi is as good as advertised.
Click to expand...
I really like Levi, but we have no idea how he will play in the NHL, especially giving him a big load right away would be strange and it's not like Adams.

Our other two goalies have stats: 88,6% and 89,2% + 3.6 GAA and don't look good. It seems obvious that we need goalie.
 
Fjordy said:
I really like Levi, but we have no idea how he will play in the NHL, especially giving him a big load right away would be strange and it's not like Adams.

Our other two goalies have stats: 88,6% and 89,2% + 3.6 GAA and don't look good. It seems obvious that we need goalie.
Click to expand...

And goalie goes hand in hand with being one of if not THE worst rush defending and high danger defending teams in the league. That's where Saros is the better option - his stuff against cross slot passes and HDCA is better. Hellebuyck is a lot more settled in how he makes his stops - we even saw it when Buffalo went into Winnipeg and got him moving to exploit him (and they did that to Oettinger on that trip too).
 
  • Like
Reactions: SECRET SQUIRREL, Mr Orangeshirt and Irie
Chainshot said:
And goalie goes hand in hand with being one of if not THE worst rush defending and high danger defending teams in the league. That's where Saros is the better option - his stuff against cross slot passes and HDCA is better. Hellebuyck is a lot more settled in how he makes his stops - we even saw it when Buffalo went into Winnipeg and got him moving to exploit him (and they did that to Oettinger on that trip too).
Click to expand...
Well Saros is available? What the hell is Nashville going to do and why the hell is Trotz a GM now? Really? o_O
 
Diaspora said:
If they're tearing it down, I'd offer 13OA + 45OA + UPL + Bryson (if they want him) for Bucky and DeMelo. The overs/unders on each piece balance out, and we resolve two issues at once.
Click to expand...
They'd want Jokiharju before Bryson.
 
Reader mode
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom