Dubinsky also held out before, and he shares the same agent as Joey. Would be a bit hypocritical on Dubinsky's behalf to become upset about it.Knowing his competitive nature, I can't believe that Dubie is very happy hearing that RyJo thinks after one good year he is worth as much as Dubie finally got in a life time contract. I am also not sure Dubie appreciates being labelled by none other than Joey himself as a second line center when it was Dubie who had to face off constantly against Sidney Crosby in the playoffs.
That's not "truly how they feel about him." Not a single source has reported that. If they felt that way about him they wouldn't have offered him 6 and 8 year deals. Porty even reported today they were extremely impressed with his offseason conditioning and how he looked when he came back to Columbus. They may have some questions about him, but they don't think he's a prima donna.
Nick Foligno makes $3 million a year. Anisimov makes $3 million a year. They play on the third line. That's how. Those were recent signings too, obviously guys like Calvert are still on their entries. The bridge is fine but I don't blame the kid for being offended when the front office expects him to be the #1 center but get paid less than #1 center (Dubie) and the #2 center and the #3 (arty). A guy like Dubie is certainly more proven and earned his term but expecting Joey to take $3 million per I think is ridiculous, and then trying to invoke public backlash to pressure him into taking it is even worse.
Dubinsky also held out before, and he shares the same agent as Joey. Would be a bit hypocritical on Dubinsky's behalf to become upset about it.
I still wish Dubinsky would do/say something about it to Joey, though.
It has everything to do with the CBA.
The CBJ owns his rights for several more years, after that he can sign wherever he wants for as much money as possible.
Until then he can get an offer sheet from another team and if they want to pay him a billion dollars and give up 4 1st round picks then he's in business to likley go wherever he wants.
There is no reason for the CBJ to even consider $12M/2 years. If he had proven to be a franchise player then yes he could get that kind of money in a 4-7 year deal but he's under club control for 2 more years.
I guess I wasn't clear the first time I said it. I don't think any player is WORTH 8 years and $80 million.
Well, from a business perspective, wouldn't you generate enough money from jersey sales/increased ticket sales/increased TV ratings to make it a worthwhile investment? Not exactly a revenue sinkhole, I'd think
fair enough...you'd pay it, just wouldn't be happy about doing so...i can understand that
This is one fan who does not agree that "both sides" are wrong. I am 100% BlueJackets, the team.
I am leaning towards the team, but don't you think Johansen deserves a little more than what Foligno and Anisimov are making?
Are the Jackets still a good team if Johansen is not playing? Yes.
Is the Jackets offense immensely better if Johansen IS playing? Without a doubt.
Both sides need to compromise.
Not off his first contract, no. In 2-3 years, that's when he should be getting paid, not now.I am leaning towards the team, but don't you think Johansen deserves a little more than what Foligno and Anisimov are making?
Not off his first contract, no. In 2-3 years, that's when he should be getting paid, not now.
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC 4m
John Davidson on Prime Time Sports says Johansen request on two-year bridge is "twice as much" as CBJ offer ($3M per).