Rhaego
Registered User
- May 18, 2011
- 6,648
- 4
Top 3? Which of Huberdeau, RNH or Landeskog do you see him displacing?
Huberdeau
Top 3? Which of Huberdeau, RNH or Landeskog do you see him displacing?
Top 3? Which of Huberdeau, RNH or Landeskog do you see him displacing?
If he is so amazing, why wasn't he a high pick despite his size like Sergei Samsonov?
If he is so amazing, why wasn't he a high pick despite his size like Sergei Samsonov?
If Brendan Morrow is so good, why wasn't he a high pick like Daniel Tkaczuk in the same draft?
Probably because it wasn't obvious at the time.
According to some posters here, it is obvious right now that Grimaldi has first overall talent but the scouts are just looking the other way only because of size. I think the pick of Samsonov at 8th shows that if a player is indeed, obviously, unbelievably talented then they will go high in the draft regardless of size.
Perhaps he's a top five talent in the same way Schremp and Schroeder were.
"And I would compare him to Marty," said Darryl Plandowski, Tampa Bay's head amateur scout. "He's a special guy."
“I don’t know why (he was still available), but I’m happy he was there,” Florida general manager Dale Tallon said. “I love him. Every tournament I saw him in Europe, he was the most dynamic player in every one of those tournaments. It was unbelievable how good he was. People were excited to see him play. We’re in the entertainment business, too. I like watching good players play. He gives it all every shift. He’s got skill, speed and he’s got tremendous competition.”
"When we asked him if he was 5-foot-7, he said, 'No, I'm only 5-foot-6' and we all laughed because he's not afraid of his size," one veteran Eastern Conference amateur scout, who interviewed Grimaldi at the Combine, told NHL.com. "He's very honest and focused, and at that size, if you're not focused you won't be able to play this game."
Even when Grimaldi faces an obstacle he can't overcome, he finds the silver lining in the cloud. When told by a reporter that a scout said he'd have been the No. 1 overall pick if he'd been six inches taller, Grimaldi said, " At least it's something I can't control. I mean, if it were something like, 'He needs to be faster,' or 'He's too heavy and needs to drop some weight,' I could control that. So I think that's a good thing."
I tend to think he would have been a mid to late first round pick.
Unless you are telling me that in addition to being 4 inches taller, his numbers were also going to be a whole lot better
I know people like to compare him to Patrick Kane, but in Kane's draft year he put up 145 in 58 games in the OHL.
When Kane was 16 he put up 34 point in 15 games for the US U-18 program according to hockey db stats, by a wide margin he was by far the best player (like twice as good as everyone else) on a team that
At 16 Grimaldi put up 22 points in 30 games for the US U-18 program. At 17 Grimaldi put up 25 points in 22 games. Good, but no where close to the type of player Kane was.
IF he were 5'10, then maybe he would compare somewhat favorably to Sven Bartschi, who went 13th overall; although I would argue that Bartschi was a More productive player in a better league
First thing to remember is that putting up a point per game with the NTDP team is different than putting up a point per game in the USHL with another team. The NTDP team is the youngest in the league. Age, inexperience, physical and mental immaturity are huge factors working against them on most nights. The majority of the NTDP team(s) didn't even dominate the NAHL for those same reasons. The sledding is even tougher for them obviously in a much superior league. Second thing to remember is that Grimaldi's NTDP team isn't one of the better offensive teams the NTDP has had. Offensively, they're basically a one line team with Rocco, J.T. Miller, and Reid Boucher and Rocco is the straw that stirs that drink.
For more perspective, just look at where Rocco is in NTDP History for scoring. He's currently 8th in career goals, 2nd in career assists, and 5th in career points. The only players ahead of him in career points are 1) Phil Kessel (180); 2) Patrick Kane (172); 3) Andy Hilbert (153); 4) Jeremy Morin (139); and then 5) Rocco Grimaldi (135).
Even with that, you have to remember that during Kessel, Kane, and Morin's NTDP runs they played in the NAHL both seasons and not the USHL like Rocco. Hilbert's first season was also in the NAHL as well but his second season was in the USHL (NTDP last played full seasons in the USHL during the 98-99 and 99-00 seasons. They just rejoined the USHL last season). When Hilbert played with the NTDP they also used to play a lot more games and the USHL was a much weaker league back then. Now not only were all 4 of those players playing in weaker leagues, but in the case of Kessel, Kane, and Morin you also need to look at who they played with. Kessel played with the following: Peter Mueller (also Top 10 in NTDP goals, assists, and scoring), Jack Johnson (#3 in all-time NTDP d-man scoring), Erik Johnson (#4 in all-time NTDP d-man scoring) Nathan Gerbe, Jack Skille, Ryan Stoa, etc. Kane played with following: Blake Geoffrion, Bill Sweatt, Erik Johnson, Jamie McBain, Jim O'Brien, and Rhett Rakhshani. Morin played with the following: Drew Shore, Jerry D'Amigo, Ryan Bourque, Jordan Schroeder, Kyle Palmieri, Cam Fowler (#10 all-time NTDP d-man scoring), David Warsofsky, Danny Kristo, etc. Andy Hilbert also played with the #10 all-time NTDP player in career points in Connor Dunlop.
With that for some perspective, you also just have to see Rocco play to see what the hype is about. If he were 5'10, he'd be in the running for the #1 pick in the draft. He's an elite skater. Very fast. Very shifty. He has a great shot. He has very, very slick hands. Very good vision. He's very good on face-offs. He plays both ends of the ice. And most importantly, given his size, is that he's a pit bull. He's small but he's compact and tenacious. He doesn't back down at all. He's not afraid to throw his "weight" around, go in the corners, in front of the net, traffic areas, etc. He not only goes to those areas but he excels in them and isn't pushed around and he'll challenge anyone in the process. He's also probably the most driven player I've ever followed. His only drawback is his size.
That said, he's not going Top 10 because he is that small. Even in the new NHL it's a risk and one I don't think teams will be willing to make that high. But he should, and I think he will, go in the 1st Round. This draft doesn't have a lot of "guarantees" and a lot of the players have some glaring warts. A guy like Rocco is worth the pick in the 1st round.
Is he actually 5'6" or is he 5'6" like St. Louis is 5'9"?
Probably Huberdeau.
you never know he can still grow
That's just what I was wondering. There have been successful guys in the NHL that size (some very siccessful) but they usually lie and give themselves a few inches. If he is saying he is 5'6" does that mean he is 5'4" or is her really 5'6"?
you never know he can still grow
If he is so amazing, why wasn't he a high pick despite his size like Sergei Samsonov?