nbwingsfan
Registered User
- Dec 13, 2009
- 22,644
- 17,052
so going back one year makes up your reference point ??
go back to bed
Well these are the players that Garland is competing against so yes it kind of does disprove your "point".
so going back one year makes up your reference point ??
go back to bed
Well these are the players that Garland is competing against so yes it kind of does disprove your "point".
i am talking about a general perception amongst scouts
even the maritime midget teams/ feeder into the Q are the weakest in canada
you must know that![]()
an opinion that happens to be true
i will leave it at that
and leave it with i see no other reason to not have the top chl player not get an invite
appart from the league he competes in, i dont see proof otherwise
The only thing that makes sense to me is that they don't think he makes their team better, for whatever reason. Maybe he doesn't fit the style they want to play, maybe they don't like his attitude?
But the bottom line is, they want to win, period.
Yeah, and that line of thinking is wrong. No conspiracy required. His attitude is top notch and guys like Dave Tippett were thrilled with him, so I don't buy that angle. Team USA may say they want to win but they make all kinds of strange and totally arbitrary decisions about guys. They're not above petty politics that's for damn sure.
Yeah, and that line of thinking is wrong. No conspiracy required. His attitude is top notch and guys like Dave Tippett were thrilled with him, so I don't buy that angle. Team USA may say they want to win but they make all kinds of strange and totally arbitrary decisions about guys. They're not above petty politics that's for damn sure.
first time watching him on youtube and is he really 5'8? Swear he looks shorter than that maybe 5'6.
There's no doubt he has strong worth ethic on the ice, but he's a guy who's a bit of a hot head and isn't well liked by his own team or even the coaching staff (I know this for a fact). He knows he's the best player in the league and acts like it, which has a tendency to rub people the wrong way so maybe this is what team USA wanted to avoid?
My best guess as to why, although I still think it's a big mistake.
Then what or who is your source?
Yeah, and that line of thinking is wrong. No conspiracy required. His attitude is top notch and guys like Dave Tippett were thrilled with him, so I don't buy that angle. Team USA may say they want to win but they make all kinds of strange and totally arbitrary decisions about guys. They're not above petty politics that's for damn sure.
Got to give this kid a bump, I mean 92pts in 38 games, come on. I may have to drive to Moncton to catch a few games this season.
He is not getting enough attention, no invite to US team...yeah he's small but there are lots of small players in today's game. He's likely to break 140pts this season.
Needs 8 points in next 4 games to match Drouins numbers in his draft+1 year.
This is effectively (if we are looking for an even comparison) Garland's draft+2 year since he was went undrafted in his first draft eligible year. Impressive numbers nevertheless!
I'd agree with handicapping his success age wise if he was larger. He's still pretty damn small.