Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | Where's the Beef?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Spawn

Something in the water
Feb 20, 2006
44,622
17,393
Edmonton
No, because once the Oilers found his weak spot he was basically ineffective. He got lit up after they found the first one.

Jarry has warts, but the pens suck.
The Pens suck and they are still getting a better performance off a no name rookie third stringer than Jarry.

Swapping Nurse for Jarry actively makes the team worse and you’re now looking to add two top 4 D-men at the deadline instead of one.

If all we were considering was present and future cap space it would make sense. But the team is trying to win a cup. We are going to be hard pressed to have the assets to acquire one top 4 dman at the deadline. Adding two? Might as well throw the season away.
 

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
17,235
19,050
Vancouver
I’d be willing to bet your mortgage that Connor Murphy is an Oiler at some point.
He's a realistic get for sure. Easy to make the logical connection (I've done as well early in premature deadline shopping machinations). Questions will be about ability to move the needle, the competitive environment for premium scarcity positional asset.

Now put your mortgage down and I'll take the bet on it!!
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
101,562
15,345
Somewhere on Uranus
He's a realistic get for sure. Easy to make the logical connection (I've done as well early in premature deadline shopping machinations). Questions will be about ability to move the needle, the competitive environment for premium scarcity positional asset.

Now put your mortgage down and I'll take the bet on it!!

I think if the Hawks try to move Murphy a few teams will be in the queue to get him
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
38,543
19,490
I think if the Hawks try to move Murphy a few teams will be in the queue to get him
Maybe he will use his 10 team no trade clause strategically. Don't put a team like Anaheim on it. He could rig it to make sure if he's traded it's only to one of a few teams
 

guymez

The Seldom Seen Kid
Mar 3, 2004
34,882
15,507
Not sure about that. Nurse has been solid this year outside a poor start. Karlsson's elite, fast puck movement and carry ability would move the puck out of zone faster and with more certainty. It's an issue after Ekholm Bouchard.

But regardless, the trade market being relied upon for an upgrade looks shallow and with competition that have the ammunition to dictate it.
How do you define solid?
Offence consistently dies on his stick.
He has in every game so far made at least one wrong read on D.
He still gives up prime ice (and backs into the goalies kitchen) when defending the rush.

I guess we should be happy with that and not expect any better?

For me the player on D that has been solid is Ekholm.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Davo Ikinzom

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
17,235
19,050
Vancouver
I think if the Hawks try to move Murphy a few teams will be in the queue to get him
It's definitely going to be the challenge navigating a competitive market with limited supply of a premium priced asset which is right shot defenseman. Murphy seems more of a B list guy not necessarily a bonafide difference maker.

Makes a wee bit of sense to trial Nurse at 2RD to create flexibility if the Oilers get priced out of the right shot top 4 d-market.
 

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
17,235
19,050
Vancouver
How do you define solid?
Offence consistently dies on his stick.
He has in every game so far made at least one wrong read on D.
He still gives up prime ice (and backs into the goalies kitchen) when defending the rush.

I guess we should be happy with that and not expect any better?
Look at his time on ice. Deployment and situational play. He plays substantive defensive zone starts and competitive situational play for this team. Doesn't get the bump that playing with McDavid's dominating top line provides. I've posted those historic numbers for you before. Nurse isn't going anywhere and his salary isn't going to change. He's been pretty solid including bringing back his physical nasty style which adds another dimension. Every defenseman will make errors and bad reads in every game. Nature of this high speed collision sport.

It's a waste of energy wishing Nurse and his salary away.
 

guymez

The Seldom Seen Kid
Mar 3, 2004
34,882
15,507
Look at his time on ice. Deployment and situational play. He plays substantive defensive zone starts and competitive situational play for this team. Doesn't get the bump that playing with McDavid's dominating top line provides. I've posted those historic numbers for you before. Nurse isn't going anywhere and his salary isn't going to change. He's been pretty solid including bringing back his physical nasty style which adds another dimension. Every defenseman will make errors and bad reads in every game. Nature of this high speed collision sport.

It's a waste of energy wishing Nurse and his salary away.
Well..you and I have a different benchmark for solid.
Thats fine.
Nurse is a $9.25M damn...he should be playing against the other teams best players consistently.
He isnt because he cant handle it.
Watch the player. Watch how often the play dies on his stick in the O zone.
Watch him defend the rush.
Watch how he defends the cycle and what reads he defaults to.

Once you have done that...then watch Ekholm. Watch what he does with the puck on his stick in the O zone. Watch his reads in the D zone. All of that against the other teams best players.

The difference is obvious.

You're correct...the team is stuck with him and his bloated contract. That being said that doesnt mean we are compelled to watch the player wearing rose colored glasses.
 

Cloned

Begging for Bega
Aug 25, 2003
81,793
72,032
He's a realistic get for sure. Easy to make the logical connection (I've done as well early in premature deadline shopping machinations). Questions will be about ability to move the needle, the competitive environment for premium scarcity positional asset.

Now put your mortgage down and I'll take the bet on it!!
We all know property is more expensive in Vancouver ;)
 

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
17,235
19,050
Vancouver
Well..you and I have a different benchmark for solid.
Thats fine.
Nurse is a $9.25M damn...he should be playing against the other teams best players consistently.
He isnt because he cant handle it.
Watch the player. Watch how often the play dies on his stick in the O zone.
Watch him defend the rush.
Watch how he defends the cycle and what reads he defaults to.

Once you have done that...then watch Ekholm. Watch what he does with the puck on his stick in the O zone. Watch his reads in the D zone. All of that against the other teams best players.

The difference is obvious.

You're correct...the team is stuck with him and his bloated contract. That being said that doesnt mean we are compelled to watch the player wearing rose colored glasses.
Keep on keepin on. It's a pointless discussion. I watch the player plenty and do deep dives to help contextualize. Whining and moping about Nurse changes nothing. It's a longterm decision this team has to manage around. Now they have a worse and smaller defense to improve after getting through to the Cup.
 

guymez

The Seldom Seen Kid
Mar 3, 2004
34,882
15,507
Keep on keepin on. It's a pointless discussion. I watch the player plenty and do deep dives to help contextualize. Whining and moping about Nurse changes nothing. It's a longterm decision this team has to manage around. Now they have a worse and smaller defense to improve after getting through to the Cup.
No whining and moping happening.
Just recognition of the reality that is Darnell Nurse.

I would agree that he has imporved but he isnt at the level of solid IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davo Ikinzom

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
17,235
19,050
Vancouver
We all know property is more expensive in Vancouver ;)
My property is in Cowtown! haha But interesting the rental rate between what we get for Calgary property is not far off what we're pay for prime Van rental location.

Tough needle for the Oil to thread with top 4RD. Looks like well stocked competitors might be fishing the same scarcity need. Yikes!

No whining and moping happening.
Just recognition of the reality that is Darnell Nurse.

Youre right though...the conversation is pointless.

Solid indeed.
It's a conversation that dead ended months ago when I asked that we end an endless loop. Requesting that again because it is tired and pointless.
 

guymez

The Seldom Seen Kid
Mar 3, 2004
34,882
15,507
It's a conversation that dead ended months ago when I asked that we end an endless loop. Requesting that again because it is tired and pointless.
It was really about what you consider to be solid.

I dont need an advanced stat to validate when Nurse makes an unforced error in the O zone and negatively affects the play.
I also dont need an advanced stat to validate when I see Nurse make a bad read.

If the outcome comes up roses...despite him...(which would be validated by stats) that doesnt necessarily reflect on the quality of his situational play.
Watching the details of the game is important.

As I said...improved...sure. I can agree with that.
He is a ways from solid though.
 
Last edited:

29292929

Registered User
Oct 15, 2017
315
406
Henri Jokiharu is the guy to go for. Good numbers. Buffalo hopefully sucks so they might move him early. They have already done business with buffalo. Righty that moves well and passed well. O ya , drafted by Stan Bowman. Expiring contract so no long term ties unless he performs. If you got them retain would be able to add even more (they lack physicality everywhere)

Not sure what cost would be probably very high.
 

SwedishFire

Registered User
Mar 3, 2011
5,443
1,910
Not resigning especially Broberg was Beyond stupid. Having problems at defence isnt nice. Could had ignored to resign Brown and other scrubs. Holloway not as important, but could be one to resign too.

Carrick wasnt that important to resign.

Ekholm Bouch
Nurse Broberg
Kulak Stercher

RNH McDavid Hyman
Skinner Leon Arvidsson
Holloway Henrique Janmark
Philp Ryan Perry

Looks so much better.
Who cares if the 4th line sucks. They will play max 7 min a game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheNumber4

Took a pill in Sbisa

2showToffoliIwascool
Apr 23, 2004
16,899
8,063
Australia
Henri Jokiharu is the guy to go for. Good numbers. Buffalo hopefully sucks so they might move him early. They have already done business with buffalo. Righty that moves well and passed well. O ya , drafted by Stan Bowman. Expiring contract so no long term ties unless he performs. If you got them retain would be able to add even more (they lack physicality everywhere)

Not sure what cost would be probably very high.

If they trade him they're only RHD left would be Connor Clifton
 

Scrapin Ice

Registered User
Oct 25, 2024
442
151
A '26 second and Dermott and Max Wanner for Kovacevic -- he's been playing top pair while Hughes and Pesce were out and did quite good moving the puck to Siggy and defending and brought some toughness. Both Hughes and Pesce are back. This has pushed Simon Nemec (who they want to develop) out of the lineup. NJD showcased Kovacevic last game. Who cares we could have had him for next to nothing in the summer. Might seem like a lot to you guys but it does quite a few things for us. Its also the price you pay for horrendous professional scouting and poor signings without much vision.


Trade Olivier Rodrigue to Milwaukee Admirals (Nashville) with a 3rd '26 for Matt Murray.
 
Last edited:

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,833
23,627
Canada
I'd rather wait and see how Nemec is handled by the Devils. Kind of a Broberg-like situation happening there seeing Hamilton and Pesce there signed long-term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McTonyBrar

North

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
16,335
14,676
A '26 second and Dermott and Max Wanner for Kovacevic -- he's been playing top pair while Hughes and Pesce were out and did quite good moving the puck to Siggy and defending and brought some toughness. Both Hughes and Pesce are back. This has pushed Simon Nemec (who they want to develop) out of the lineup. NJD showcased Kovacevic last game. Who cares we could have had him for next to nothing in the summer. Might seem like a lot to you guys but it does quite a few things for us. Its also the price you pay for horrendous professional scouting and poor signings without much vision.


Trade Olivier Rodrigue to Milwaukee Admirals (Nashville) with a 3rd '26 for Matt Murray.
Put down the alcohol and go to sleep.

What a ridiculous trade idea.
 

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,833
23,627
Canada
Put down the alcohol and go to sleep.

What a ridiculous trade idea.
It's the same poster who wanted those two a couple of years back. Pretty sure they were moving Broberg for the D when he was a Hab. Murray is 26 now and still can't find any way onto an NHL squad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: North

Spawn

Something in the water
Feb 20, 2006
44,622
17,393
Edmonton
A '26 second and Dermott and Max Wanner for Kovacevic -- he's been playing top pair while Hughes and Pesce were out and did quite good moving the puck to Siggy and defending and brought some toughness. Both Hughes and Pesce are back. This has pushed Simon Nemec (who they want to develop) out of the lineup. NJD showcased Kovacevic last game. Who cares we could have had him for next to nothing in the summer. Might seem like a lot to you guys but it does quite a few things for us. Its also the price you pay for horrendous professional scouting and poor signings without much vision.


Trade Olivier Rodrigue to Milwaukee Admirals (Nashville) with a 3rd '26 for Matt Murray.
Hey I remember you! Why the new account?
 

Scrapin Ice

Registered User
Oct 25, 2024
442
151
I'd rather wait and see how Nemec is handled by the Devils. Kind of a Broberg-like situation happening there seeing Hamilton and Pesce there signed long-term.
Nemec projects though as a top pair guy who if he develops we won't have the cap space to afford. (Supposing we are signing Bouchard long term).
Or maybe I have a lack on how to jumble the cap long term. Don't we need someone relatively 'cheap' for the next 3-5 years that can move up and down the right side as needed? Someone experienced defensively that doesn't make a slew of rookie mistakes.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad