Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | What Do Our RFA's Sign For Edition

What Do Our RFA's Get?

  • Bouchard 1 Year up to $3 million

  • Bouchard 1 Year $3-4 million

  • Bouchard 1 Year Over $4 million

  • Bouchard 2 Years <$3.5 million AAV

  • Bouchard 2 Years $3.5-$4 million AAV

  • Bouchard 2 Years > $4 million AAV

  • Bouchard Longer Than 2 Years

  • McLeod 1 Year >$1.5 million

  • McLeod 1 Year $1.5 to $2 million

  • McLeod 2 Years >$1.5 million AAV

  • McLeod 2 Years $1.5 to $2 million AAV

  • McLeod 2 Years Over $2 million AAV

  • McLeod Longer Than 3 Years

  • McLeod Traded


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Broberg Speed

Registered User
Oct 23, 2020
8,129
5,469
What would happen to the bonuses if we traded brown at the draft next season?
If you could move the cap overage bonuses in a transaction along with Brown's UFA negotiating rights, which seems unlikely but I haven't seen proof one way or the other, it would cost an Oilers first round pick to do so.

Teams with the flexibility to take on dead cap should be available next season with the expected cap increase. Probably worth it from an Oilers perspective.
 

Hemsky4pm2

Registered User
Dec 2, 2017
916
714
This Flyers Cates signing at $2,625M AAV isn't helping the Oilers' McLeod arb case. New high water mark for a player like McLeod.

Starting to think that a 1-year deal at $2M AAV with McLeod and 1 year $3.5M AAV with Bouchard might be necessary.
 

Vagabond

Registered User
Dec 24, 2004
9,867
4,920
Edmonton
Not sure how this can be possible unless you include Ceci, Fogi a couple prospects and at least a 1st and a couple other picks with salary retention. 🤔

 

Broberg Speed

Registered User
Oct 23, 2020
8,129
5,469
This Flyers Cates signing at $2,625M AAV isn't helping the Oilers' McLeod arb case. New high water mark for a player like McLeod.

Starting to think that a 1-year deal at $2M AAV with McLeod and 1 year $3.5M AAV with Bouchard might be necessary.
At this point, unless they trade McLeod, I want to see him go through the arbitration process.
 

FlameChampion

Registered User
Jul 13, 2011
14,670
17,241
Not sure how this can be possible unless you include Ceci, Fogi a couple prospects and at least a 1st and a couple other picks with salary retention. 🤔



Makes a lot of sense from a fit point of view. But yeah I dont know how you make it work cap wise. I am just going to assume that the hockey news is credible and just looking for clicks. I think the ship has sailed on Konency here.
 

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
18,796
15,439
Edmonton
So Americans don't want to win the cup now? Is it not at least a little concerning that now both Russians and Americans don't want to play in Edmonton?
The last 30 Cups have been won by American teams. Us and Toronto are probably Canada's only hope of bringing the Cup back here anytime soon. Money and lifestyle is more important to some players. The American players that sign here came here because they want to win over anything else. That's one of the reasons why Campbell gets a free pass for last season from me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryanbryoil

Paralyzer

Oilers Win Cup in 2025
Sep 29, 2006
15,984
8,427
Somewhere Up North
Not sure how this can be possible unless you include Ceci, Fogi a couple prospects and at least a 1st and a couple other picks with salary retention. 🤔



If I had to guess, it'd be Foegele, McLeod, a 1st, and Prospect (Laughton makes 1.5M at 50% so would be a McLeod replacement pretty easily), with both being retained 50%. I can't see it working any other way. And no, I don't think Philly would retain 50%...but then again...this is the Flyers...

Edit:

Checking cap, we'd still have 4M left to re-sign Bouchard to a bridge deal (3.5M x 2 years) and we'd be set. If we needed a defence upgrade, can always trade Kulak and Ceci for that upgrade.
 

Kelevra

Registered User
Mar 6, 2007
667
129
I don't understand how Debrincat is worth 7.8 but Nurse is "worth" 6.5-7M but most fans. If they had equal contracts I'm taking Nurse over Debrincat easily. Heck, its debatable for me if id take Debrincat or Nurse at their current contracts.
 

FlameChampion

Registered User
Jul 13, 2011
14,670
17,241
I don't understand how Debrincat is worth 7.8 but Nurse is "worth" 6.5-7M but most fans. If they had equal contracts I'm taking Nurse over Debrincat easily. Heck, its debatable for me if id take Debrincat or Nurse at their current contracts.

I dont think I would personally want to pay Debrincat at 7.8m either. I like the player but I'm not sure you can win with him making 8m a year. Its like this for a lot of the smaller players unfortunately.

I like Nurse. Glad hes on the team (we would be way worse without him). But hes not a 9.25m dman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iCanada

Spawn

Something in the water
Feb 20, 2006
44,446
16,984
Edmonton
If I had to guess, it'd be Foegele, McLeod, a 1st, and Prospect (Laughton makes 1.5M at 50% so would be a McLeod replacement pretty easily), with both being retained 50%. I can't see it working any other way. And no, I don't think Philly would retain 50%...but then again...this is the Flyers...

Edit:

Checking cap, we'd still have 4M left to re-sign Bouchard to a bridge deal (3.5M x 2 years) and we'd be set. If we needed a defence upgrade, can always trade Kulak and Ceci for that upgrade.
I think it’s pretty unlikely the Flyers would use up both their remaining retention slots for the next two seasons for such a little return.

Also worth pointing out that the article that is quoted in that story also has the Oilers interested in Parayko and Pesce. Feels less like a real rumour and more like speculation (which is fine, we are entering the doldrums of summer here).
 

FlameChampion

Registered User
Jul 13, 2011
14,670
17,241
If I had to guess, it'd be Foegele, McLeod, a 1st, and Prospect (Laughton makes 1.5M at 50% so would be a McLeod replacement pretty easily), with both being retained 50%. I can't see it working any other way. And no, I don't think Philly would retain 50%...but then again...this is the Flyers...

Edit:

Checking cap, we'd still have 4M left to re-sign Bouchard to a bridge deal (3.5M x 2 years) and we'd be set. If we needed a defence upgrade, can always trade Kulak and Ceci for that upgrade.

They could make the cap work if they were to do lets say McLeod + Ceci + Campbell + (firsts/prospects) for Konency@50% and Hart. Then go and sign Toews and Dumba for cheaper deals (assuming that they will sign cheap deals on the Oilers) to replace McLeod/Ceci. You can certainly make it work but its a bit of fantasy land wishing going on here (i.e. not very realistic).
 

McJadeddog

Registered User
Sep 25, 2003
20,733
6,009
Regina, Saskatchewan
If I had to guess, it'd be Foegele, McLeod, a 1st, and Prospect (Laughton makes 1.5M at 50% so would be a McLeod replacement pretty easily), with both being retained 50%. I can't see it working any other way. And no, I don't think Philly would retain 50%...but then again...this is the Flyers...

Edit:

Checking cap, we'd still have 4M left to re-sign Bouchard to a bridge deal (3.5M x 2 years) and we'd be set. If we needed a defence upgrade, can always trade Kulak and Ceci for that upgrade.

I can't see how Philly couldn't find a better deal than that though. That isn't exactly giving up much for two good forwards. Although I suppose McLeod fits Philly's window a lot better, and has good upside. Maybe if the prospect was Bourg or something. Still don't think Philly does it though.
 

Broberg Speed

Registered User
Oct 23, 2020
8,129
5,469
If I had to guess, it'd be Foegele, McLeod, a 1st, and Prospect (Laughton makes 1.5M at 50% so would be a McLeod replacement pretty easily), with both being retained 50%. I can't see it working any other way. And no, I don't think Philly would retain 50%...but then again...this is the Flyers...

Edit:

Checking cap, we'd still have 4M left to re-sign Bouchard to a bridge deal (3.5M x 2 years) and we'd be set. If we needed a defence upgrade, can always trade Kulak and Ceci for that upgrade.
I'd be down with that. Great deal for Philly. They get a lot for Laughton but we get an upgrade at 3C and cap space. I wouldn't be surprised if the Flyers had to add.

Ride the current D and see what happens at the deadline. That team definitely would have a shot.
 

The Nuge

Some say…
Jan 26, 2011
28,013
9,291
British Columbia
If I had to guess, it'd be Foegele, McLeod, a 1st, and Prospect (Laughton makes 1.5M at 50% so would be a McLeod replacement pretty easily), with both being retained 50%. I can't see it working any other way. And no, I don't think Philly would retain 50%...but then again...this is the Flyers...

Edit:

Checking cap, we'd still have 4M left to re-sign Bouchard to a bridge deal (3.5M x 2 years) and we'd be set. If we needed a defence upgrade, can always trade Kulak and Ceci for that upgrade.

When you look at their team, it kind of makes you wonder if they might retain 50% on both for the right return. They’re stuck with Petersen for 2 more years, Atkinson’s LTIR for 2, Hayes’ cap for 3, Ellis’ LTIR for 4, Risto for 4, etc. If they blow it up for 3 years, they’ll have basically cleared out all their bad contracts, and be in a position to sign a couple top UFAs and make a push.

It finishes up all their retention slots for the next couple years, so it would probably have to be an overpay.

If you could get them to swap Hart and Campbell (assuming they’re not on his 10 team NTC), and sign Bouch for ~3.5, it leaves us at ~1.6 left that we could upgrade someone now, wait to the deadline and use it for a big rental defensive acquisition, or keep open towards Brown’s overage. It also makes it doable if they only retained 50% on Konecny, but not Laughton.


It’s a massive blockbuster which we usually don’t see, but something like

Konecny (50% retained)
Laughton (50% retained)
Hart
Seeler

For

2023 1st
Foegele
McLeod
Campbell
Broberg
XB
Tullio/Savoie/Petrov

We end up with

Kane - McDavid - Brown
Nuge - Drai - Hyman
Janmark - Laughton - Konecny
Holloway - Ryan - Lavoie
Pederson

Nurse - Ceci
Ekholm - Bouchard
Kulak - Seeler
Desharnais

Skinner
Hart
 

Anarchism

John Henry
May 23, 2019
4,024
1,130
northern alberta
When you look at their team, it kind of makes you wonder if they might retain 50% on both for the right return. They’re stuck with Petersen for 2 more years, Atkinson’s LTIR for 2, Hayes’ cap for 3, Ellis’ LTIR for 4, Risto for 4, etc. If they blow it up for 3 years, they’ll have basically cleared out all their bad contracts, and be in a position to sign a couple top UFAs and make a push.

It finishes up all their retention slots for the next couple years, so it would probably have to be an overpay.

If you could get them to swap Hart and Campbell (assuming they’re not on his 10 team NTC), and sign Bouch for ~3.5, it leaves us at ~1.6 left that we could upgrade someone now, wait to the deadline and use it for a big rental defensive acquisition, or keep open towards Brown’s overage. It also makes it doable if they only retained 50% on Konecny, but not Laughton.


It’s a massive blockbuster which we usually don’t see, but something like

Konecny (50% retained)
Laughton (50% retained)
Hart
Seeler

For

2023 1st
Foegele
McLeod
Campbell
Broberg
XB
Tullio/Savoie/Petrov

We end up with

Kane - McDavid - Brown
Nuge - Drai - Hyman
Janmark - Laughton - Konecny
Holloway - Ryan - Lavoie
Pederson

Nurse - Ceci
Ekholm - Bouchard
Kulak - Seeler
Desharnais

Skinner
Hart
LOL

Hart
Cates (perhaps sign and trade)
Seeler

for

Campbell
Broberg
McLeod
1st '24
2nd '24

Still Holland signs Comtois and Grant.

Kane-MCD-Hyman
RNH-Drais-Brown
Foegele-Cates-Janmark
Comtois/Holloway-Grant-Ryan

Hart
Skinner

This is a trade I proposed a few weeks ago.
Woodcroft will have to show more flexibility with his wingers.
 

Oilers in NS

Registered User
Oct 11, 2017
12,323
12,060
When you look at their team, it kind of makes you wonder if they might retain 50% on both for the right return. They’re stuck with Petersen for 2 more years, Atkinson’s LTIR for 2, Hayes’ cap for 3, Ellis’ LTIR for 4, Risto for 4, etc. If they blow it up for 3 years, they’ll have basically cleared out all their bad contracts, and be in a position to sign a couple top UFAs and make a push.

It finishes up all their retention slots for the next couple years, so it would probably have to be an overpay.

If you could get them to swap Hart and Campbell (assuming they’re not on his 10 team NTC), and sign Bouch for ~3.5, it leaves us at ~1.6 left that we could upgrade someone now, wait to the deadline and use it for a big rental defensive acquisition, or keep open towards Brown’s overage. It also makes it doable if they only retained 50% on Konecny, but not Laughton.


It’s a massive blockbuster which we usually don’t see, but something like

Konecny (50% retained)
Laughton (50% retained)
Hart
Seeler

For

2023 1st
Foegele
McLeod
Campbell
Broberg
XB
Tullio/Savoie/Petrov

We end up with

Kane - McDavid - Brown
Nuge - Drai - Hyman
Janmark - Laughton - Konecny
Holloway - Ryan - Lavoie
Pederson

Nurse - Ceci
Ekholm - Bouchard
Kulak - Seeler
Desharnais

Skinner
Hart
What r the goods on this Seeler. Dont know much about him
 

The Nuge

Some say…
Jan 26, 2011
28,013
9,291
British Columbia
LOL

Hart
Cates (perhaps sign and trade)
Seeler

for

Campbell
Broberg
McLeod
1st '24
2nd '24

Still Holland signs Comtois and Grant.

Kane-MCD-Hyman
RNH-Drais-Brown
Foegele-Cates-Janmark
Comtois/Holloway-Grant-Ryan

Hart
Skinner

This is a trade I proposed a few weeks ago.
Woodcroft will have to show more flexibility with his wingers.

Considering the players we were linked to aren’t in your proposal, I’m not sure it’s likely
 

Anarchism

John Henry
May 23, 2019
4,024
1,130
northern alberta
Considering the players we were linked to aren’t in your proposal, I’m not sure it’s likely
Perhaps not. Yours is a dream also. I would love Konecny and Laughton but its super unreal. In your proposal Konecny could push Brown to the third ....i would love to see a Comtois-Laughton-Brown third. That would take alot of heat of the Defensive parts of the Draisaitl line. With Seeler and Hart ...that would give us more than enough to Kick Vegas. But its quality Fantasy.
Furthermore what makes you think that the "players were connected to" are for real--isn't just media speculation-guessing 95-100 percent of the time?
I would argue mine makes more sense and yours is surreal.
 

The Nuge

Some say…
Jan 26, 2011
28,013
9,291
British Columbia
Perhaps not. Yours is a dream also. I would love Konecny and Laughton but its super unreal. In your proposal Konecny could push Brown to the third ....i would love to see a Comtois-Laughton-Brown third. That would take alot of heat of the Defensive parts of the Draisaitl line. With Seeler and Hart ...that would give us more than enough to Kick Vegas. But its quality Fantasy.
Furthermore what makes you think that the "players were connected to" are for real--isn't just media speculation-guessing 95-100 percent of the time?
I would argue mine makes more sense and yours is surreal.

We’ve been linked to Konecny for a long time now. They’re trying to move Hart, and Campbell hasn’t work as planned. The rumour about Laughton is logical if McLeod’s wanting too much money. I don’t see why piecing together a deal around that seems crazy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad