Well hopefully moving down doesn't matter and they end up trading the pick for immediate help. Or just for the laughs, they have a trade in place pending on player being available. That player gets drafted at 13 and team backs out of trade lolThis is off the top of my head so it could be wrong.
But Only one time in franchise history have they moved up in the lottery and it was one spot (2016 from 4th to 3rd)
They’ve either moved down or stayed put in every other lottery they’ve been in (18 times) despite finishing in the top 10 17 times.
1/19
Unheard of odds.
Not that we were “supposed” to win this one. But moving down is pretty f***ing hilarious.
Wonder if they'll get cute with it and draft the kid from NYAnother metro team getting Schaefer sucks way more than us dropping by a spot.
From your lips to Wad's ears.IMO drafting in 14 position won’t matter as GMDW will trade both picks for immediate help
It IS symbolic. Last year was all about honoring 13. Next year is 13+1.Bleh lost the #13. Oh well. Still could've been worse. Not really sad about dropping, more sad about losing #13 for symbolism reasons.
I mean this wasn't peak TV but the ball combinations were released a couple of days beforehand (here is the PDF).There's no one on this board who understands what we just saw.
In the space of an afternoon I wrote a script that allowed tracking the mechanics of what we just saw (see the URL I posted earlier). And I'm pretty sure I'm still on this board.There's no one on this board who understands what we just saw.
Agreed; let’s package it and get a roster player under a good contractWhatever.
Here's to hoping we trade both 1st!
Such a setup wouldn't accurately reflect the actual draw odds.I think some smart high school kids could invent a system where a whole bunch of balls with team logos get dumped into a vat by 16 team representatives. Then the vat spins around until some Canadian celebrity like Tate McRae comes out blind folded and she pulls a lever and one ball spits out and it is immediately obvious to everyone which team won because their logo and colors are on the winning ball.
Alright I'll play dumb: What's the problem with the teams handling the balls?Such a setup wouldn't accurately reflect the actual draw odds.
EDIT: In a Perfect World, one could hypothetically accomplish this by divvying up 200 balls among the various teams - 37 to SJS, 27 to CHI, we'd get 4, et cetera et cetera. The problem there, though, is that it makes verifying that the lottery balls are untampered and fair and equal that much more difficult, because of both 1) the sheer number of balls to inspect and 2) the fact that you're having team representatives handle their own lottery balls, which creates a conflict of interest. There's reasons it's designed this way.
Once a long long time ago I was an auditor who helped certify the Ohio lottery. In our control logs basically once the balls got weighed if they were touched by anyone outside the auditors it was considered a control fail. We would take the balls, put them in the dispenser and seal it. Before the lotto took place we would make sure that tampering seal wasn’t broken. Basically the idea is if you let someone touch the balls before hand they could slightly press down on it changing the shape enough to allow it to have more erratic movement therefore giving them a more unique chance to get the improve their odds.Alright I'll play dumb: What's the problem with the teams handling the balls?
Have the league provide 200 balls or whatever amount is needed for the odds, have teams stamp their balls live (each team allowed to bring a celebrity or ex-player for this riveting easter egg painting prime TV), bring the balls to the pool, draw the lottery in the way koteka envisioned... seems pretty hard to tamper with?
Frankly if somebody tampered with it somehow, now THAT makes for some interesting drama for the league lol.