Rumor: - Rumors & Proposals Thread | If Babcock is Our New Coach Will Players Want to Come Here? | Page 157 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | If Babcock is Our New Coach Will Players Want to Come Here?

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
I mean even Mattias Janmark has some form of trade protection. As does the goalie we want to get rid of.

I would wager roughly halfway through the Dickinson and Murphy contracts we will be looking to move them.
I'm gonna be an optimist. Fella who just got Conn Smythe is 37. Players are playing older now and are keeping themselves in tip top shape
 
I mean even Mattias Janmark has some form of trade protection. As does the goalie we want to get rid of.
Yup, Janmark is just a weird bad deal lol. The Oilers didn't give that shitty goalie the trade protection, but it sucks. I think moving him with retaining a decent amount is the best way forward.

I would wager roughly halfway through the Dickinson and Murphy contracts we will be looking to move them.
We can only hope. If cap goes up along the way, that should mitigate things. Bad contracts and a long flat cap was murder for the Oilers.

Also, Stan sucks.
 
Happy to get Murphy re-signed, but it really goes to show you how much losing Larsson hurt. Not even mentioning Klefbom.
Losing two emerging prime year top four d-men for nothing is a significant piece of this team's frustrations. Took them years and trade capital to replace Larsson.

I like Murphy alot for his character, leadership, low maintenance and hard ice game. Term is tough but that's the Canadian Tax in the modern era of entitlement.
 
Ask yourself where you want to live in February.

Alberta or California/Nevada
Considering that they spend roughly half the season away from Alberta it's kind of a moot point.

Doling out trade protection to virtually every player we sign is just bad management. The Flames in the early 2010s had about half their roster tied up on trade clauses.

Nurse would be at least a bit easier to deal if we had free reign to send him wherever we wanted.
 
Man how do you guys not know that players have agents and they probably agree to less money if they get a NMC. If you have a problem with NMCs, go complain to the NHL.

Go check how many NMCs and NTCs Carolina has.

I'll be waiting.
It’s the cost of doing business.

These guys are willing to extend with us but want control in case things don’t work out.
 
Man how do you guys not know that players have agents and they probably agree to less money if they get a NMC. If you have a problem with NMCs, go complain to the NHL.

Go check how many NMCs and NTCs Carolina has.

I'll be waiting.
Getting players' asks down to about where they should be because of NMCs isn't exactly a great indicator of management's ability.

We gave Trent Frederic a full NMC too, by the way.

Just a quick glance at our lineup, the only players not under some form of trade protection next year are:

Podkolzin (which kicks in the final year of his extension), Bouchard (which kicks in the following season), and Ty Emberson.
 
It's not like Babcock is some defensive guru. His Leafs teams and Red Wings teams without Lidstrom were mediocre defensively, middle of the pack generally at best.

If the Oilers can be middle of the pack defensively next year that would be a significant improvement over the gong show of last season. Not good enough to compete for anything important, but at least good enough probably to be a 100+ point team again.

When you look at those 2010 Wings teams, or the Leafs, I'd actually say he overachieved defensively.

This was his defence the last year with the Wings
1782142444901.png


And his last full year with the Leafs.
1782142580276.png


He and his staff made playoff-quality lemonade out of some fairly s**ty lemons.


Babcock runs a fairly high-pressure, but defensive system. He wants to force mistakes, but counts on the backside away from the puck to be skating and rotating quickly to either loop back and stop a developing odd-man situation, or attack and jump on a bobbled puck.

Not dissimilar from what Lavy, Maurice, or Q run, who all come from the same generation of coaches.


You can contrast that to Knob, who ran a fairly basic system, but with a wrinkle that he wanted to set up isos and 1v1s, where his players could out-skate (McDavid, McLeod, McLovin, Holloway, Kapanen, Janmark, Brown), or out-muscle (Kane, Drai, Podz, Hyman) the one guy they're up against to get a leveraged position.

That's why guys who were unable to generate separation (Skinner, RV, Maggie, Fred, Perry, Rico) all looked especially useless under him, unless they were with 2 guys that created space. (Rico with Janmark and Brown, Perry with McDrai, ect)
 
Murphy will be 38 when his deal expires and Ekholm will be 39 when his expires.

But that's going to be someone else's problem. It's all about getting the AAV down for the next few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Faelko
Losing two emerging prime year top four d-men for nothing is a significant piece of this team's frustrations. Took them years and trade capital to replace Larsson.

I like Murphy alot for his character, leadership, low maintenance and hard ice game. Term is tough but that's the Canadian Tax in the modern era of entitlement.
And thats what people need to understand, the "Canadian Tax". Sounds like u get it. I call it a cold weather tax. Basically, we have to pay a player more to come here. I wish the NHL could come up with a contract for players that each contract is the same league wide. 5 mil here is the same as 5 mil in Florida or Vegas. I know it will never happen but I'd like to see it. I'm sick of seeing a player request a trade and he lists the same 4 teams as everyone else, Florida, Vegas, Dallas, Tampa. Reminds of those " Super teams" in basketball
 
When you look at those 2010 Wings teams, or the Leafs, I'd actually say he overachieved defensively.

This was his defence the last year with the Wings
View attachment 1257391

And his last full year with the Leafs.
View attachment 1257392

He and his staff made playoff-quality lemonade out of some fairly s**ty lemons.


Babcock runs a fairly high-pressure, but defensive system. He wants to force mistakes, but counts on the backside away from the puck to be skating and rotating quickly to either loop back and stop a developing odd-man situation, or attack and jump on a bobbled puck.

Not dissimilar from what Lavy, Maurice, or Q run, who all come from the same generation of coaches.


You can contrast that to Knob, who ran a fairly basic system, but with a wrinkle that he wanted to set up isos and 1v1s, where his players could out-skate (McDavid, McLeod, McLovin, Holloway, Kapanen, Janmark, Brown), or out-muscle (Kane, Drai, Podz, Hyman) the one guy they're up against to get a leveraged position.

That's why guys who were unable to generate separation (Skinner, RV, Maggie, Fred, Perry, Rico) all looked especially useless under him, unless they were with 2 guys that created space. (Rico with Janmark and Brown, Perry with McDrai, ect)

This did spark the smallest amount of optimism in me.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad