Rich Nixon
No Prior Knowledge of "Flyers"
Then we need fire Torts until 30th May 2024.
No better time than yesterday.
Then we need fire Torts until 30th May 2024.
yup... and 100% Torts is getting his hands on MM. so expect a different player when the seasons in mid swing from him.The Flyers aggressively wanting Michkov to get out of his KHL contract after 1 year is as clear as it gets that this isn't a rebuild -- it's a retool. If it was a rebuild, they wouldn't mind a 3 year timeline to really stockpile. So, they're not acquiring more assets, they're keeping all their valuable aging players on the roster, and they want their superstar prospect here tomorrow. It looks very much like they want to keep this roster intact and just insert Michkov, under the tutelage of Tortorella. Not great!
I have no doubt there's myopic business decisions at work too. They're worried about the Flyers leaving the public consciousness (bit late, eh?), so they want that jolt ASAP, even if it compromises building a contender long-term.
The thing is that the KHL rules are made the way that the player-initiated buyout in Michkov's case is now only possible for the last year of the contract. Mutual termination is possible at any moment though, but no way SKA will be willing to let him go.ASF on STG:
- Apparently Michkov was originally scheduled to throw out the Phillies first pitch with Oliver Bonk. He thought that was interesting that no one reported on that
- ASF credits the Flyers for doing such a good job bringing Michkov in, how excited Michkov was with the Flyers. "He wants to play for the Flyers, and soon."
- "If he wants to get over, he's going to get over. It's not going to be a problem getting him here. It's just not. The question is when. And I think the Flyers are perfectly fine with him staying in Russia another year, he'd be like a junior hockey player. I wouldn't be surprised if he's here next year." From everything ASF is hearing, he wouldn't be surprised if next year is the year Michkov tries to get over.
The Flyers aggressively wanting Michkov to get out of his KHL contract after 1 year is as clear as it gets that this isn't a rebuild -- it's a retool. If it was a rebuild, they wouldn't mind a 3 year timeline to really stockpile. So, they're not acquiring more assets, they're keeping all their valuable aging players on the roster, and they want their superstar prospect here tomorrow. It looks very much like they want to keep this roster intact and just insert Michkov, under the tutelage of Tortorella. Not great!
I have no doubt there's myopic business decisions at work too. They're worried about the Flyers leaving the public consciousness (bit late, eh?), so they want that jolt ASAP, even if it compromises building a contender long-term.
I mean I think you'd be really really hard pressed to find an NHL team that wouldn't want their potential franchise player to join after 1 year rather than 3 years. Forming opinions on management's plan based on something like this seems a bit weird
I would rather he stay in Russia for 3 years rather than be stuck with this absolute garbage player development staff to be honest… Still great news though however. The whole situation was WAY overblown to begin with. He was never not gonna come over at some point in the next 3 years.ASF on STG:
- Apparently Michkov was originally scheduled to throw out the Phillies first pitch with Oliver Bonk. He thought that was interesting that no one reported on that
- ASF credits the Flyers for doing such a good job bringing Michkov in, how excited Michkov was with the Flyers. "He wants to play for the Flyers, and soon."
- "If he wants to get over, he's going to get over. It's not going to be a problem getting him here. It's just not. The question is when. And I think the Flyers are perfectly fine with him staying in Russia another year, he'd be like a junior hockey player. I wouldn't be surprised if he's here next year." From everything ASF is hearing, he wouldn't be surprised if next year is the year Michkov tries to get over.
Go look at where the Eagles ranked in rush attempts last year. Thanks.Maybe we should put a pin in this conversation for about 10 years, at which you might have entered the 21st century.
My dream scenario is they let Michkov's KHL contract run its course, draft well, gut the roster, and go into summer 2026 with Michkov stateside and a whole lotta cap space.
Meanwhile, the Oilers continue to flounder, and McDavid decides to become the highest-paid free agent ever. So you hand him a blank check and watch him and Michkov slaughter the league for two seasons until McD's knee explodes for good.
A boy can dream.
The thing is that the KHL rules are made the way that the player-initiated buyout in Michkov's case is now only possible for the last year of the contract. Mutual termination is possible at any moment though, but no way SKA will be willing to let him go.
That random guy on Twitter was right all along…ASF played up "behind-the scenes, backroom" aspects of getting out of the contract. Maybe it's artificial Keith Jones-leaked hype. Who knows.
we have a same dreamMy dream scenario is they let Michkov's KHL contract run its course, draft well, gut the roster, and go into summer 2026 with Michkov stateside and a whole lotta cap space.
Meanwhile, the Oilers continue to flounder, and McDavid decides to become the highest-paid free agent ever. So you hand him a blank check and watch him and Michkov slaughter the league for two seasons until McD's knee explodes for good.
A boy can dream.
I want what you guys are smoking…we have a same dream
It's not just that. It's also that they're keeping a bunch of guys with actual value. The only reason to do that is if you're certain you'll be competing while they're still worth something on the ice.
This. I wouldn't mind it if they were content to trade Laughton and Konecny, etc., etc. That signals to me they have a real vision. I don't really understand wasting Michkov's cheapest years on a rebuilding team either, but that's not signaling complacency, and it's a situation any North American prospect would encounter. Twiddling thumbs, not moving assets, and just throwing a Michkov cherry on top and getting back into the perma-bubble? No, thank you.
I can think myself into understanding TK staying. In theory he will still be good in 5 years, we hope. But Laughton? Tippett? Seeler? Hart*?
How are we achieving this 3 year turnover without actually turning anything over?
I can think myself into getting TK staying.
I’m willing to wait until the draft rolls around next year to see if any of TK/Laughts/Hart are moved before calling the rebuild a complete bust but it certainly doesn’t look promising.They’re pissing on our head and telling us it’s raining with this “rebuild.” It’s a retool.
Now imagine where this organization would be if they didn’t luck into a Michkov.
I just want ONE player to be moved out that wasn’t obvious for Torts/One foot out the door reasons.I’m willing to wait until the draft rolls around next year to see if any of TK/Laughts/Hart are moved before calling the rebuild a complete bust but it certainly doesn’t look promising.
When trading Konecny was discussed last deadline, I said it's a summer move at earliest. I said there is no harm in knowing if you win a Bedard or Fantilli to change the calculus. If they got a Reinbacher or Leonard, I'd be slamming the trade button. Well, Michkov at 7 does change the calculus. But then Konecny also likely needs a new contract before Michkov plays a single minute here.
It's not like the Flyers are devoid of nice middle 6 pieces. But their entire 2-3 year plan should be to surround Michkov with multiple other players on his tier. It's the funniest part about people like Meltzer wailing, "You want to be like Buffalo?!" And then being content following that one-star model.