CaliSabresfan24
Registered User
I don't hate that idea actually depending on the cost.Duffer brought up Foote from TB falling out of their graces. Talk me out of it.
I don't hate that idea actually depending on the cost.Duffer brought up Foote from TB falling out of their graces. Talk me out of it.
Duffer brought up Foote from TB falling out of their graces. Talk me out of it.
I would think getting close and missing. The justification there is that "we were close but needed something extra"What result for the season is most likely to get us moves made in the offseason?
Making the playoffs?
Missing close?
Falling out?
Bueller?
Is there not one?
Yeah, but the vibes man. We can't have someone going to the front of the net while the cores isn't doing it. Imagine all the tension in the lockerroom.There is a Swiss remedy for the team's allergy to the front of the net.
Not sure the results are the benchmark so much as the style in which they arrive there.What result for the season is most likely to get us moves made in the offseason?
Making the playoffs?
Missing close?
Falling out?
Bueller?
Is there not one?
Listening to them talk about a underwhelming and overpaid player like Boeser over someone who has put up 38 goals in his last 82 games in Olofsson is makes me wonder at their ability to identify someone who is actually any better than what is already here.
Rivet- "This team needs leadership!" They need a Brock Boeser!""
I think with that take it is pretty obvious he is asleep long before any west coast games start and doesn't actually watch the players play.Yeah, that's a wild take. I know he has an absolute hate-boner for Olofsson. What is Boeser other than a more expensive, less productive Olofsson? Is it that he's North American? Is Riv's tight with Boeser somehow? I don't understand it.
I think with that take it is pretty obvious he is asleep long before any west coast games start and doesn't actually watch the players play.
I agree, and I have stated before, I would not want Boeser on the team for league minimum.Sort of living off Boeser at North Dakota and as a rookie instead of say, his last three years of work? Probably. I have a host of issues, not the least of which is I watch a lot of late games while unable to sleep, and Boeser is not that player any more. He's a power play shooter who is about as complete a passenger on his own line as anyone I've seen in the NHL in years. There is no effort, no speed, and no physicality... and he makes nearly Girgensons more than Olofsson.
Kinda what we're looking for? A big young cheap defenseman. He's not even struggling horribly. Duffer's point was that he may be looking for a fresh start as a guy with pedigree. Seems like the type of low key, d depth move that Adams would pull off.Depends on why he's falling out of grace. He only plays 14 minutes a night. If he's struggling doing that for Tampa.......I'm not sure he's worth a look.
They really need some gritty veterans on this squad. It's why Im not sold on keeping Olofsson-Jost-Mitts being the 3rd line going forward. They need to beef up the bottom-6. Momentum is so important. When the team is on their heels- they could use some players that would go through the f***ing wall to flip that momentum.There is a Swiss remedy for the team's allergy to the front of the net.
What result for the season is most likely to get us moves made in the offseason?
Making the playoffs?
Missing close?
Falling out?
Bueller?
Is there not one?
I like the idea of Foote. Depending on how the season goes up to the deadline, Foote for a girgensons with 50% retention sounds like a very Tampa style move.
Listening to them talk about a underwhelming and overpaid player like Boeser over someone who has put up 38 goals in his last 82 games in Olofsson is makes me wonder at their ability to identify someone who is actually any better than what is already here.
Unless Girgensons specifically asks for a trade, he's going nowhere. Same with Okposo and Anderson
It would be a very Tampa move. Which is why we'd be better off IMO signing him to an extension (3 years or less) and keeping him. Because to get to where teams like Tampa are, we need guys like Girgensons for that role, and with Asplund falling off a cliff this year, we really don't have anyone who does what Zemgus does on the roster or in the pipeline.I like the idea of Foote. Depending on how the season goes up to the deadline, Foote for a girgensons with 50% retention sounds like a very Tampa style move.
They really need some gritty veterans on this squad. It's why Im not sold on keeping Olofsson-Jost-Mitts being the 3rd line going forward. They need to beef up the bottom-6. Momentum is so important. When the team is on their heels- they could use some players that would go through the f***ing wall to flip that momentum.
Damn, I wish we had a Foligno-like prospect coming up. Ive mentioned his name way too often over the past few months, but this team needs a player like him.
Sounds like the boys are having issues shaking off the vacation vibes