Winger23
Registered User
- May 3, 2007
- 5,759
- 623
Look at TOI... King regularly plays over 15 mins a game. Pearson has not. Maybe if Pearson sticks on the top line sure. King makes Lewis money, can log big mins on any line, isn't a defensive liability, and scored 1 less goal then Brown last year. Yes King at 1.9 is as important to the team as Pearson. If Pearson was on Kings level defensively he'd be a lock in the top 6. He's only now just getting a look because other players have been ineffective. Conversely... if King was on Pearson's level offensively he'd be a lock in the top 6 as well. That's the point... one's better at offense, ones better a defense, and it isn't me saying this. It is Sutter with the players TOI.
It isn't all about scoring with Kings hockey... except when it comes to Lewis/Brown.
Edit: I checked Pearson's average TOI a while ago... it was something like 13:50 while he was leading the team in goals last year... it's kinda shocking/funny... if he's playing with Kopitar maybe he'll log more time.
Pearson was a lock on the 2nd line last year prior to breaking his leg. The only reason he started on the 3rd line was because of the acquisition of Lucic. Sutter loves his grinders with the ice time to king but In no way shape or form is king a top 6 forward like Pearson is.
Look at it this way, it's much easier to replace king and his defense than it is with Pearson in the top 6. There is no way they are on the same level.
If you want to talk cap hit Pearson is actually cheaper than king by I believe 550k.