If Lou needs a kane, I am hoping he hooks one loose from the Windy CityKane is a talent, but too much noise around him. He's a guy that should be on a short leash of one year deals, so you can cut bait easily. Doubful Lou brings him in. LMAO at any GM intentionally giving him a multi-year deal.
He wanted flexibility in G. He did not want to commit long term to Grubauer. Acquired Kuemper to be his Osgood. He got that and won. Maybe he still believes in Francousz. The Georgiev deal is a wildcard, but he seems to want to control costs in net. He certainly has spent a lot of picks on getting goalies though over the years. 2nd for Grubs, 1st for Kuemper, and 2 3rds and 1 5th for George.Where I agree with Perf’s comment is that I don’t like Sakic’s goalie moves.
But yes, I can’t see much of a legitimate argument against someone winning a cup. You can make the argument that Sakic took the correct decision in strengthening other parts of the lineup to withstand goaltending.
Additionally, posters on this site tends to blur the lines between good-great and perfection with regards to GM and roster decisions.
I blame @MJF with starting this retool, rebuild, renovate, renew, retort, refuse etc. designation controversy.
MJF… Go to the box… two minutes… feel shame!
I would go after that Kane all day long.If Lou needs a kane, I am hoping he hooks one loose from the Windy City
You also can potentially get more of a return in a trade for him if an extension is agreed-upon
He produced on TOR and COL. For those that are saying his numbers are inflated due to the COL offense, well, isn't this supposed to be a guy that some certain 'potential' on this team would benefit from? He's proven on it two different teams already. He's also a known commodity to Lou.Ugh.
When I keep reading this, I have to ask is this a personal preference or a jab at Lou's incompetence?
Q1: Who here wants the Islanders to sign Kadri?
Q2: How much do you think he signs for in free-agency? And then, if Gaudreau re-signs in the next 48 hours, how much do you think he signs for then?
Before answering, remember this is a guy who will be 32 right when the next season is starting and is going to get SERIOUSLY PAID for his "out of norm" 87-point season.
Also before answering, remember that before this last season:
1) Number of times he scored 80 points in a season: 0
2) Number of times he scored 70 points in a season: 0
3) Number of times he scored 60 points in a season: 1 (61, and it took all 82 games to do it)
His 3 seasons before last year he scored 46 goals and had 66 assists in 180 games for a per82 of 21-30-51.
JOSH f***ING BAILEY over that same time had a 15-39-54...
Some team is going to give Kadri 6 years and 45+ million....please, let's hope it isn't Lou
Agree. And to add, the newer analytics school of thought “seemingly” doesn’t put as much stock into committing to goalies in term or cost.He wanted flexibility in G. He did not want to commit long term to Grubauer. Acquired Kuemper to be his Osgood. He got that and won. Maybe he still believes in Francousz. The Georgiev deal is a wildcard, but he seems to want to control costs in net. He certainly has spent a lot of picks on getting goalies though over the years. 2nd for Grubs, 1st for Kuemper, and 2 3rds and 1 5th for George.
I would go after that Kane all day long.
I set my base for him since he will be 32 years old the same week the new season starts...He produced on TOR and COL. For those that are saying his numbers are inflated due to the COL offense, well, isn't this supposed to be a guy that some certain 'potential' on this team would benefit from? He's proven on it two different teams already. He's also a known commodity to Lou.
So, IF Kadri is the only player that is willing to sign with NYI as a UFA, then do you do it? [Remember, you can keep all your fancy picks/prospects]. He's just money and cap hit.
[and yes, I would take Kadri for free as a UFA because he will make this team better]
I think you can see some teams are not caring about the later years in these deals because (a) the cap will go up, (b) not an issue in winning now, and (c) most importantly, there's been a market every year whether trade, LTIR, etc. to move the backend of ugly deals.I set my base for him since he will be 32 years old the same week the new season starts...
4/24, then sure I am signing him. But no, I don't want that contract (even at 6 million) when he is 36 and 37 years old (5 or 6 year deal, which he is likely going to get)...
And ya, he got back to back 32 goal seasons in Toronto, full seasons where he only missed one game.
But he AVERAGED only 19 goals in the other FOUR seasons with the Leafs and of course he only AVERAGED 21 goals in his other TWO seasons with the Avalanche....
So did the really produce with both of them?? Or, did he produce 33% of the time lol
Hard pass
$1mDylan Strome 2M flier deal as a fallback, yes or no?
I would take an overpaid UFA Kadri vs. an asset acquired Miller (if those assets are 2023 1st, Raty, etc.). If the 'Nucks want Wilde, Bailey, and something else because the market dried up, well, bye bye.I'd prefer Miller over Kadri but I can't see Miller interested in signing an extension here over NYR. Kadri would at least listen to what NYI has to offer because he played with Lamoriello in Toronto.
I would rather sign 2-3 Zach Parise's for a single year or a young player (you know on the right side of 30) who has upside and may only need a change of scenery for half the years and cost...I think you can see some teams are not caring about the later years in these deals because (a) the cap will go up, (b) not an issue in winning now, and (c) most importantly, there's been a market every year whether trade, LTIR, etc. to move the backend of ugly deals.
Do I think Kadri is the answer? No. However, I also understand NYIs limitations on acquiring UFAs. Absent sending valuable assets the other direction, then I would rather sign an overpaid UFA guy that helps now. Figure it out later.
Ugh.
When I keep reading this, I have to ask is this a personal preference or a jab at Lou's incompetence?
Q1: Who here wants the Islanders to sign Kadri?
Q2: How much do you think he signs for in free-agency? And then, if Gaudreau re-signs in the next 48 hours, how much do you think he signs for then?
Before answering, remember this is a guy who will be 32 right when the next season is starting and is going to get SERIOUSLY PAID for his "out of norm" 87-point season.
Also before answering, remember that before this last season:
1) Number of times he scored 80 points in a season: 0
2) Number of times he scored 70 points in a season: 0
3) Number of times he scored 60 points in a season: 1 (61, and it took all 82 games to do it)
His 3 seasons before last year he scored 46 goals and had 66 assists in 180 games for a per82 of 21-30-51.
JOSH f***ING BAILEY over that same time had a 15-39-54...
Some team is going to give Kadri 6 years and 45+ million....please, let's hope it isn't Lou
Fallback for what - if we can't get an elite top line player? I like what we have now better than Strome.Dylan Strome 2M flier deal as a fallback, yes or no?
That's fair. The Isles are not there yet as a franchise that will (a) attract premium UFAs, and (b) guys that are worth 7-10M, so it's not something one should wait around for to happen. Last year, they finally entered the 21st century in modern sports to give them a chance.I would rather sign 2-3 Zach Parise's for a single year or a young player (you know on the right side of 30) who has upside and may only need a change of scenery for half the years and cost...
This philosophy is exactly why our roster is full of 40-50 pt players making 5+ million a season and we never have the cap space to sign guys who are actually worth 7-10 million a year; you know actual difference makers; nor can we trade said 40-50 pt players who are overpaid...
Kadri, especially considering what he is likely to get in this market, even more so if he is the headliner (and he will be if the Flames ink Gaudreau in the next 40 hours) would be a colossal mistake....
Sorry if already posted. Regardless, this is insane if true. I give Friedman the benefit of the doubt here, but what GM treats an asset like that? Do they really think teams are going to blindly trade for a guy they can’t talk extension with?
I have to assume this was the goal.Seems like horrible asset management all around by Vancouver, unless they are resigning him.
I believe Perron is a slam dunk to resign.I think once Gaudreau chooses his destination, the attention will focus to Miller and then Kadri.
One eye to keep a name on is David Perron. He's only ever signed contracts with St. Louis, but they don't have a lot of cap space and need to make sure they can re-sign O'Reilly, Kyrou, and Thomas next summer. He's aged like fine wine and would look really nice on Barzal's right side.
Yikes lol. I’d absolutely take strome at this pointFallback for what - if we can't get an elite top line player? I like what we have now better than Strome.