Toggle sidebar

Roster/Rumors/Speculation/Trade Talk - 2023-24: Hotel California

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Throttle said:
Sure, that's obvious. I am asking those that want to trade Varly, what is THEIR plan for goalie #2.

Another side note here, when Varly hits UFA, he's a 35er contract. His salary/cap hit will decrease by about 30-50% on any team. Max term he will likely see is 2 years too. So, absent this season, he will fall in line w/other backup/goalie salaries in the 2.5-3.25 range.
Click to expand...
Go to the goalie store and get one off the rack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Throttle
The Wahligator said:
I’d sign Holtby. Has familiarity with Korn and Lambert and more upside than career backups.
Click to expand...
Not in love with the idea since he was hot garbage last year in WAS, same in VAN, but was decent in DAL. The coaching staff know him well enough to make that decision. Also, one has to look with how well he partnered with Samsonov who was chomping on his tail in WAS.

The Wahligator said:
Click to expand...

Smart move right there for both teams. No need to sign Georgie with his RFA price, get some value out of the loser of their goaltending dual. COL gets a possible #1 to be. Does Francouz get moved? Seems like Joe doesn't want to pay Kuemper - he shouldn't either.
 
Throttle said:
Not in love with the idea since he was hot garbage last year in WAS, same in VAN, but was decent in DAL. The coaching staff know him well enough to make that decision. Also, one has to look with how well he partnered with Samsonov who was chomping on his tail in WAS.


Smart move right there for both teams. No need to sign Georgie with his RFA price, get some value out of the loser of their goaltending dual. COL gets a possible #1 to be. Does Francouz get moved? Seems like Joe doesn't want to pay Kuemper - he shouldn't either.
Click to expand...
FYI the Avs first pick in this year's draft is not until the 6th round.
 
Throttle said:
Not in love with the idea since he was hot garbage last year in WAS, same in VAN, but was decent in DAL. The coaching staff know him well enough to make that decision. Also, one has to look with how well he partnered with Samsonov who was chomping on his tail in WAS.


Smart move right there for both teams. No need to sign Georgie with his RFA price, get some value out of the loser of their goaltending dual. COL gets a possible #1 to be. Does Francouz get moved? Seems like Joe doesn't want to pay Kuemper - he shouldn't either.
Click to expand...
Kinda funny that the Yotes or Hawks wouldn't pony up something a little better than the nothing the rangers received. Not that far removed from being competent. Was awful enough last year to not cost a lot to re-sign.
 
Throttle said:
Not in love with the idea since he was hot garbage last year in WAS, same in VAN, but was decent in DAL. The coaching staff know him well enough to make that decision. Also, one has to look with how well he partnered with Samsonov who was chomping on his tail in WAS.


Smart move right there for both teams. No need to sign Georgie with his RFA price, get some value out of the loser of their goaltending dual. COL gets a possible #1 to be. Does Francouz get moved? Seems like Joe doesn't want to pay Kuemper - he shouldn't either.
Click to expand...
I'd guess that COL considers themselves set in goal with Francouz and Georgiev. Probably under $5M for both combined. This could allow them to keep someone like Nichushkin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riseonfire
Top Corner said:
I would be shocked if Lou ever makes a player for player deal, we shall see
Click to expand...
Can we do Barzal for Tkachuk?

MJF said:
FYI the Avs first pick in this year's draft is not until the 6th round.
Click to expand...
Considering the amount of homegrown talent they have, their pick availability over the next 3 years is scarce. Truly, went all in and it worked. If it didn't, then yikes on fixing it.
 
Re: Tarasenko, he'll be 31 after next season at the end of his contract. What kind of extension is it going to take to keep him? Would he want to max out term or could you get him for 3-5 years? Nice thing about a guy like Forsberg, if he were to go UFA and you sign him for 7 years he'll be "only" 34 at the end of the contract so you should get production out of him for most if not all of the term.
 
SI said:
This is not a good a package.
Click to expand...


Uhhhh...For a goalie with a sub .900 save % and nearly 3 GAA (and needs a new contract) it absolutely is.

Last offseason Alex Nedeljkovic was coming off a .932 save % and 1.90 GAA season with the Hurricanes and only returned a 3rd rounder.

So this price paid by Sakic was silly at best and insane at worst. Georgiev actually makes their goalie situation worse, and they paid 3 picks to do that.


...Oh and everyone knew the rangers needed to trade Georgiev. And have I mentioned...He isn't good.

What a joke.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SayItAintSoJohnny
The Wahligator said:
Two thirds is absolutely a great package for an RFA backup goalie who was barely NHL caliber the past 2 seasons.

Honestly says to me Varly could bring in at least a late first.
Click to expand...
Ned got a 3rd rounder as a 25yr, RFA, and ROY candidate... Joe likes to toss picks around, is what it means.
 
periferal said:
I'm losing my mind over the value here.

Georgiev. Isn't. Good.

If this is what he is returning then we have to trade Varlamov...


Click to expand...


Hmm, certainly looks tasty

Varlamov and Salo to Edmonton for a 2023 2nd, 2024 2nd, Broberg and the one year of Sekera's buyout contract if that is allowed

Varlamov to Detroit for 2 2023 2nds and Jared McIsaac

Varlamov and Salo to NJ for Graves and a 2023 2nd

A few ideas
 
  • Like
Reactions: periferal
Throttle said:
Ned got a 3rd rounder as a 25yr, RFA, and ROY candidate... Joe likes to toss picks around, is what it means.
Click to expand...
Nedeljkovic got a 3rd because Dundon couldn't wait to dump him Cheap f*** didn't want to negotiate with him and was prepared to lowball him.
 
leeroggy said:
Hmm, certainly looks tasty

Varlamov and Salo to Edmonton for a 2023 2nd, 2024 2nd, Broberg and the one year of Sekera's buyout contract if that is allowed

Varlamov to Detroit for 2 2023 2nds and Jared McIsaac

Varlamov and Salo to NJ for Graves and a 2023 2nd

A few ideas
Click to expand...


There you go. I mean the Isles need a retooling, have little assets, and Varly is walking for nothing next offseason.

Don't let this be another "Tavares situation" where a valuable asset just leaves for nothing. We have to maximize assets and Varly is pretty much the most valuable one we can trade (without going into a full rebuild).
 
  • Like
Reactions: SayItAintSoJohnny and leeroggy
The Wahligator said:
A lot of money going back.
Click to expand...
Plus our first
doublechili said:
Re: Tarasenko, he'll be 31 after next season at the end of his contract. What kind of extension is it going to take to keep him? Would he want to max out term or could you get him for 3-5 years? Nice thing about a guy like Forsberg, if he were to go UFA and you sign him for 7 years he'll be "only" 34 at the end of the contract so you should get production out of him for most if not all of the term.
Click to expand...
I’d prefer an ufa as well but the Blues seem like too good of a fit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom