4Cups Want More
Registered User
- May 12, 2022
- 29
- 65
For everyone knocking the Hickey deal and blaming that as one of the main reasons that we had to trade Toews I have one question.
Who would you have signed to be our #3 defenseman behing Boychuck and Leddy at that time?
It would certainly have cost us more to sign another experienced D-man than it did Hickey.
At the time we had the following defensemen on the roster:
Pelech - total 131 nhl games played
Pulock - total 84 nhl games played
Mayfield - total 83 games played
Aho - total 22 nhl games played
Toews - 0 total nhl games played and shoulder injury
I know that you must be clairvoyant and known that Hickey would get hurt and never return to his former self and that Pulock and Pelech would turn into one of the best shutdown pairings in the NHL. Also that Toews, with all of his zero experience and injury, would deserve to get a 4+ million dollar contract in two years.
The Hickey deal was a necessary deal. If not him then who would you have signed and at what cost?
Who would you have signed to be our #3 defenseman behing Boychuck and Leddy at that time?
It would certainly have cost us more to sign another experienced D-man than it did Hickey.
At the time we had the following defensemen on the roster:
Pelech - total 131 nhl games played
Pulock - total 84 nhl games played
Mayfield - total 83 games played
Aho - total 22 nhl games played
Toews - 0 total nhl games played and shoulder injury
I know that you must be clairvoyant and known that Hickey would get hurt and never return to his former self and that Pulock and Pelech would turn into one of the best shutdown pairings in the NHL. Also that Toews, with all of his zero experience and injury, would deserve to get a 4+ million dollar contract in two years.
The Hickey deal was a necessary deal. If not him then who would you have signed and at what cost?