Admitting Sakic was the better GM of the two when the move was made, isn’t some newfound or outlandish logic. It’s real, Lou got absolutely worked on that deal.
As PK mentioned, this has been beaten to death. Including responses to this kind of take.
And in addition to the expansion draft details provided above by
@danteipp, Lou only had cap space to keep two of Barzal, Pulock, and Toews in the fold. Only two.
Sure, we all liked Toews. Sure, we all wished something could have been done to keep him.
But his lower price tag and still uncertain upside made him the most marketable of all the guys Lou could have pawned off. Heck, he prolly did a goodin' for Toews sending him to exactly the type of contender where his skillset would thrive.
In fact, knowing that Lou's back was up against a wall at the time, him pulling off two seconds was a friggin' coup. That was a win-win situation for all involved.
And the numbers Toews has been putting up with Colorado... You think he'd have been doing that here? Or at about any other address in the NHL?
Hell, even our Sebastian Aho would be putting up 35-40 points for that Avalanche team.
One has simply got to keep a sense of proportion when analyzing these things.
Cap concerns make EVERY TEAM IN THE LEAGUE sacrifice guys they'd rather keep. That's part of the GMing game and it requires constant juggling. It's what creates the parity the league so desperately wanted to see after years and years of powerhouses winning a whole lot of cups in a short periods of time.
Summary:
Lou got a maximum return for a guy the cap and expansion draft were no longer allowing us to keep - and everybody knew it.