To Be Determined
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2006
- 2,758
- 9,698
Moronic, even."It's the good advice you just didn't take".
Well now that's just idiotic.
Really? I thought whoever paid him 6 would be idiotsthat's lower than expected for aav
Well I was aware of the word but it's just tough to work into everyday conversation with a friend or co-worker... sort of like "Gonorrhea".I wasn't aware of the thing that is "wharrgarbl". Now I am. It is a bit sad that my life is genuinely fuller now that it was just moments ago.
I don't know... the older I get, there more aware I become of the existence of persons in this world who could most aptly be described as "warts-onna-dick".Well I was aware of the word but it's just tough to work into everyday conversation with a friend or co-worker... sort of like "Gonorrhea".
Nurse got 9.25....Really? I thought whoever paid him 6 would be idiots
and it's the worst contract in Hockey, though Bob is back to making that argument as well tonightNurse got 9.25....
If correct, that's a nice lil hometown discount by Slavin.
If correct, that's a nice lil hometown discount by Slavin.
If correct, that's a nice lil hometown discount by Slavin.
6 years from now 6.5m for Slavin will not look bad at all. Between the cap increase and his style of play whatever drop off he has will be nullified cost wise.Those final 2 years or so have the potential to look bad. But we’re going to get really good value the first 5-6 seasons of this contract if Friedman’s numbers are correct.
You also imagine in 7-8 years, the cap has risen at least 25-35%, so this contract won’t hurt as bad if he tails off.
Overall I’d give this deal an A grade still.
Food for thought:Those final 2 years or so have the potential to look bad. But we’re going to get really good value the first 5-6 seasons of this contract if Friedman’s numbers are correct.
You also imagine in 7-8 years, the cap has risen at least 25-35%, so this contract won’t hurt as bad if he tails off.
Overall I’d give this deal an A grade still.
Thats an interesting thought. It hasn't happened in the NFL yet but they have an almost complete revenue sharing model with very few exceptions (I think the Cowboys merch is the only thing not shared) and the NFL's TV deals are something like 75% of the leagues total income.Food for thought:
I wonder if it is presumptuous to think that as the cap rises over the next 10 years, that small market teams will continue to spend to the cap.
Of course, if much of the cap rise is covered by League revenues then it won’t matter.
However, if not, then the large market teams with their significant revenue advantages will slowly but surely again have a personnel advantage.
I mean they'll look bad in the same way the last couple years of the big Jordo contract was bad. Wasn't great, but we were able to make it work and still remain incredibly competitive.Those final 2 years or so have the potential to look bad. But we’re going to get really good value the first 5-6 seasons of this contract if Friedman’s numbers are correct.
You also imagine in 7-8 years, the cap has risen at least 25-35%, so this contract won’t hurt as bad if he tails off.
Overall I’d give this deal an A grade still.
If correct, that's a nice lil hometown discount by Slavin.