Speculation: Roster Building Thread XXXIV: Walk the line into the ring of fire

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Gardner McKay

RIP, Jimmy.
Jun 27, 2007
26,027
15,434
SoutheastOfDisorder
Geo would be of interest to Carolina too right?

They crushed their draft last year, would love to raid that system one way or another.

You know... that could be optimal. If there was ever a trade to be made that would satisfy this board in terms of quality prospects being returned, I would have to think Georgiev + Kreider going to Carolina would be it. They could potentially be willing to give up that blue chip prospect because even if Kreider bolts to UFA, they now have control of Georgiev and won't walk away empty handed.
 

UAGoalieGuy

Registered User
Dec 29, 2005
16,411
4,437
Richmond, VA
You know what's funny? I was under the impression that the articles I've read about this were quoting the entire thing. Turns out... it's somewhat murky.

50.5 (B), which defines the recapture penalties, says



I was under the impression that Long-Term Contract was anything 6 years or longer. But 50.5 (A) says



That seems to define it as only deals that were signed before this CBA. Which was technically retroactive to Sept 2012. Lundqvist signed his deal in Dec 2013. But a lot has been written about how his contract qualifies, so I'm somewhat confused now.

We need a CBA specialist up in here!
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband and Tawnos

haohmaru

boomshakalaka
Aug 26, 2009
16,956
11,520
Fleming Island, Fl
You know... that could be optimal. If there was ever a trade to be made that would satisfy this board in terms of quality prospects being returned, I would have to think Georgiev + Kreider going to Carolina would be it. They could potentially be willing to give up that blue chip prospect because even if Kreider bolts to UFA, they now have control of Georgiev and won't walk away empty handed.

It would be an odd trade considering how close they are in the standings. Not sure what message that sends to the team. Interesting.
 

duhmetreE

Blessed Bigly
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2012
34,384
52,141
Bro, Igor is 20 games into his career. Prime? He could just as easily have a sophomore slump, which is way more frequent than rookies keeping up his pace. Lindgren is a rock? A rookie will come in replace a 45 pt vet d man? ADA will do something from junior, and it will just work out? Again, everything breaks perfect.

Where is OUR precedent for dumping cap? We never pull it off. Boston has eaten cap on their dumps twice. Toronto paid a 1st to dump a contract and will miss the playoffs. They are not a template. Their left side is garbage. They have better scoring than us and they will still miss. That is a cautionary tale. If gorton moves out staal with our 1st next season, he needs to be removed immediately.

Our offense will get better? How? Show me. We will have to subtract to keep 1 player. Panarin is having the second best season for a ranger ever. You can't bank on that again. Or Kreider have career highs two years in a row as a 29 year old. There is no cap to bolster the roster let alone fill holes left by buch or strome.

No problem acquiring bottom 6 help? We haven't done that in years and we had cap back then.

I'm giving you firm examples. All of your answers are unicorns. It's not just getting one single break, it is all of the stars aligning.

None of the above is a crazy risk?
Igor is in his prime? His career has been going for some time. He's new to the NHL but these results are not new. You wanted precedence? but now you're contrary to precedence.

We never got to the point of being able to dump cap... hence we never were at the end of contracts. You cant move a bloated contract with 3-5 years left, which is not what I've suggested. Moving a contract that expires in a year, ( where the cap hit is greater than the actual salary ) is not some unprecedented move. You're framing prerequisites and criteria to suit your narrative.

Kreider Zibs Buch
Panarin Strome Fast

Kreider Zibs Buch or Kakko or Kravtsov
Panarin Chytil Strome or Kakko or Kravtsov.

I can't tell if you're purposely being naive but getting bigger production and further development from Kakko, Chytil and eventually Kravtsov? Players like Miller and Lundkvist? Further development of Fox and ADA? Yeah I know,... uNiCoRnS to think we continue to improve

I'm actually talking about pieces we already have and pieces that are close.

What do you suggest? Trade all the vets? and then what? wait? What are we waiting for? Wait for Zibs to get paid $14M? Wait for the kids to make UFA money? Wait for Shesty to make 10% cap? What's your plan? more futures and picks?

Everything is a bunch of 'ifs'. What if all the draft picks fail. What if Zibanejad demands a trade. What if Panarin falls apart. What if Chytil never develops. What if Kakko is a bust. You can add all the what if's that are contrary to your view.
 

NYRangers0723

Registered User
Apr 30, 2019
2,816
1,925
It would be an odd trade considering how close they are in the standings. Not sure what message that sends to the team. Interesting.
Yeah. I mean I don’t know if it’s any serious interest or just checking in. I know Edge mentioned Dallas earlier so who knows. We also keep hearing that contract talks are ongoing so I wonder if teams are thinking he may end up staying. Unpredictable for sure
 
  • Like
Reactions: cheech70

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
29,280
11,084
Charlotte, NC
We need a CBA specialist up in here!

This literally hasn't come up yet, either, so it's not like there's precedent to cite. There are three active recapture penalties (affecting 4 teams), but all 3 were signed before this CBA. We're only now in the first possible year a deal signed after the CBA went into effect that could be retired early from.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

Gardner McKay

RIP, Jimmy.
Jun 27, 2007
26,027
15,434
SoutheastOfDisorder
It would be an odd trade considering how close they are in the standings. Not sure what message that sends to the team. Interesting.

To the Rangers? It says they couldn't get a deal done with Kreider so they traded him. I don't think it matters if its Detroit or Carolina or Boston, whoever has the highest bid is who he will be traded to.
 

Ola

Registered User
Apr 10, 2004
34,602
11,604
Sweden
You know what's funny? I was under the impression that the articles I've read about this were quoting the entire thing. Turns out... it's somewhat murky.

50.5 (B), which defines the recapture penalties, says



I was under the impression that Long-Term Contract was anything 6 years or longer. But 50.5 (A) says



That seems to define it as only deals that were signed before this CBA. Which was technically retroactive to Sept 2012. Lundqvist signed his deal in Dec 2013. But a lot has been written about how his contract qualifies, so I'm somewhat confused now.

I haven’t checked up on it, but I don’t think it applies to Hank. The reports back when the CBA came was that it applied to old contracts.
 

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
13,122
8,831
The Rangers have been pretty healthy over the last two months but this injury scare to Chytil shows just how thin the team’s depth is. I mean if Chytil is out we are back to Howden centering (an important) third line and we all remember how that was working out earlier in the season.
 

Oscar Lindberg

Registered User
Dec 14, 2015
16,024
15,378
CA
To the Rangers? It says they couldn't get a deal done with Kreider so they traded him. I don't think it matters if its Detroit or Carolina or Boston, whoever has the highest bid is who he will be traded to.
The short term optics of it to a certain group of the fanbase would be bad but it needs to be looked at long term.

Like you said, at the end of the day, I’m sending him to whoever offers the best deal. Don’t care who it is
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad