i respectfully disagree. 20 min sample size i could buy, 108 min becomes a trend, that is the equivalent of over 5 full periods of hockey with 3 pts
This is a start, but it doesn’t really put us up there with NYI and Washington whom we at least must match physically . Martin/Lee/Johnston or Wilson/Chara/Dillon (if the later two are retained).
Don't have much to add other than agreeing that Chytil is underrated by our own fanbase.
He's by no means untouchable, but he was really good last season. No reason to think he can't be a long term solution at C.
It's stark when watching but it doesn't change factsI can’t trust any measurement that suggests Danaults offensive contributions are similar to Barzal and Aho’s - there’s got to be some noise or other factors in those numbers. I don’t want to lean on “watch the games” but seriously - it’s stark when watching. He doesn’t drive offense like them at all.
It's stark when watching but it doesn't change facts
Danault scores at a similar rate at ES than some star players. Most star plays score like half their points on the powerplay. Nothing controversial here.
Those were literally points.I can’t trust any measurement that suggests Danaults offensive contributions are similar to Barzal and Aho’s - there’s got to be some noise or other factors in those numbers. I don’t want to lean on “watch the games” but seriously - it’s stark when watching. He doesn’t drive offense like them at all.
Getting $400K less than a UFA RNH? That's way too much at this point imo.I'd give Chytil 28 over 6 years and lock him down at 4.66 per.
A criminally underrated forward that can generate offense at ES.
If only we had a team with strong wingers.The question is can he do it by himself. Historically, from what I recall, when he’s not with gallagher his individual and play driving stats tank. Someone like panarin or maybe Barzal can produce regardless of linemates but Danault may need to be played with only strong players to get similar production
chytil is such a funny case, if he wasnt nyr property then the same guys pumping his tires now would be saying he is worth gauthier and robertson in a trade bc of his injuries, soft matchups, and him never breaking 30pts in his career
Getting $400K less than a UFA RNH? That's way too much at this point imo.
6 years $21-23M; buy 2 UFA years. If all goes well, get another massive contract at 27-28 years old.
if you're going 5 years, you probably want some ufa years... which bumps up that number significantly.evolving hockey has Chytil at 3 years 2.6M.. so if you're looking at 5 years you can probably get him to sign for 4 per right now if you believe in him that much
We're in a petty good spot with expansion. There's nobody we need to protect that I care that much about protecting. I would use a spot on Blackwell.Thinking expansion, I like Blackwell a lot. I think he plays a type of game not many of our guys do--lots of hustle and work ethic--but is he worth using a protection slot on?
Is it possible we swap Gauthier for a d-man considering we have that extra slot?
evolving hockey has Chytil at 3 years 2.6M.. so if you're looking at 5 years you can probably get him to sign for 4 per right now if you believe in him that much
It's even-strength production. The Tatat Danault Gallagher line has always been at the top in that regard. Take one of those wingers away, and the line struggles.I can’t trust any measurement that suggests Danaults offensive contributions are similar to Barzal and Aho’s - there’s got to be some noise or other factors in those numbers. I don’t want to lean on “watch the games” but seriously - it’s stark when watching. He doesn’t drive offense like them at all.
the counter though is why are players signing those deals right now knowing that they may be taking really low money later one when the cap starts rising again? i'm not arguing at all, i am just questioning it from the player side, what is really their incentive right now to sign those deals?see that’s what the Rangers need to hit on. Don’t screw up the evaluation and if you project a player to be good long term at a reasonable or below future dollar rate, get it done. You can’t wait until they price themselves out of your cap comfort and hope to trade them at a deadline imo.
Whatever D we got back in exchange for Gauthier likely wouldn’t be worth a protection slot.Thinking expansion, I like Blackwell a lot. I think he plays a type of game not many of our guys do--lots of hustle and work ethic--but is he worth using a protection slot on?
Is it possible we swap Gauthier for a d-man considering we have that extra slot?