Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XXXVIII

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What the Canucks would have to do to trade up for Jack...

*Pay wall*

According to this, the Canucks are asking us what #2 is worth if the Devils pass on Hughes. Speculative answer: Not Petterson. But it's a lot. Multiple 1sts, 2nds, a few players, Staal and Smith. Meh.

Not happening but its interesting being the belle of the ball.

The answer should be basically nothing. If the Devils pass on Hughes and we trade down...that would test my fandom.
 
If the Devils take Kakko first, you have to get Pettersson from Vancouver

Conversation starts and probably ends there. I’m not giving what would probably amount to 10’s if not 100’s of millions of dollars in revenue to the Canucks over the next 15 years for anything less

It would be like having the Sedins all over again
 
Not gonna lie, I'd be pretty rattled to have our highest pick ever just to trade down.

If Vancouver really lives and dies on sibling stars then make them give you everything and have 'em put the rink up as collateral.

I mean the crazy thing is they really don't have very enticing pieces to give up. #10 is decent. Boeser is a really talented player but seems a little bit brittle. Horvat is good, but not a franchise piece. Beyond that it's pretty freaking unimpressive. I'm excluding Hughes obviously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob Richards
If you had the Hughes brothers, can you even play them on the same PP unit? It’s not like the Sedins who complemented each other so well, they do a lot of the same things.
 
What the Canucks would have to do to trade up for Jack...

*Pay wall*

According to this, the Canucks are asking us what #2 is worth if the Devils pass on Hughes. Speculative answer: Not Petterson. But it's a lot. Multiple 1sts, 2nds, a few players, Staal and Smith. Meh.

Not happening but its interesting being the belle of the ball.

LoL, Petterson is the starting point, there is no deal without him.

Never in a million years happening anyway. Kakko will be a Ranger in June.
 
I don’t see it happening.

Rangers aren’t doing it without getting a ransom.

Vancouver isn’t going to want to part with the pieces to make it happen.

If I’m the Rangers, I go with something obscene- Pettersson, the 10th, next year’s first, and Woo.
Now that’s more along the lines of what it would take for me to trade the pick.

Don’t like it? Then you don’t get it.
 
Granted it’s all clickbait from the athletic or whoever, but if a trade for the second pick doesn’t start with Pettersson than that’s the easiest hangup Gorton should ever experience in his life. End of story.

There’s not enough quantity in the nucks arsenal to make that trade even remotely worth it if it doesn’t include #40.
 
Pettersson alone would be ridiculous. Did anyone here watch him this season? He’s got far more value than Hughes or Kakko by quite a margin.

Pettersson + 10th + 2020 1st? That gets any player in the league not named McDavid.

There is no deal to be had with Vancouver for #2. Let’s let it go.
 
Pettersson alone would be ridiculous. Did anyone here watch him this season? He’s got far more value than Hughes or Kakko by quite a margin.

Pettersson + 10th + 2020 1st? That gets any player in the league not named McDavid.

There is no deal to be had with Vancouver for #2. Let’s let it go.

If Hughes is at #2 and Vancouver wanted him, Pettersson is the starting point. End of story.

If they don't want to include him? Fine, then we'd just draft Hughes ourselves.
 
Pettersson alone would be ridiculous. Did anyone here watch him this season? He’s got far more value than Hughes or Kakko by quite a margin.

Pettersson + 10th + 2020 1st? That gets any player in the league not named McDavid.

There is no deal to be had with Vancouver for #2. Let’s let it go.
The question was not "what is fair value"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rongomania
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad