*edit* "stacked" has a fluid definition. Sometimes a team not known as stacked 'in the moment' is looked back on in hindsight as being stacked.
I didn't say the other teams don't have cap issues or concerns, I am saying that stacked teams *exist* and we aren't one of them, and truthfully never WERE one of them, regardless of our performance during prime Hank years. We are going to be in trouble very soon cap wise. What would make *us* stacked? Laff, Kakko, and Chytil becoming very good players. Miller continuing his ascent. Schneider building on his promising rookie year. It could very well be our future.
Even in our best years, we weren't exactly offensively dangerous. It wasn't our game. (I could be wrong here, we might have had a great offensive year or two). We thrived off good defense and Hank. The deep runs were one maybe two forwards away from winning our share of chips. But we were not complete. Cup winning teams really do have it all. Even if it's just once. AND they had to have luck thrown on top of it. Every one of us wants that with this group, no?
In short, my comment is pointing to teams like recent era TBL, this years CAR, FLA, and COL, maybe TOR. Sure they might have cap issues but those are the kinds of teams you want if you are going to have cap problems. I look at a team like CGY and see a non-stacked team that is very good and a real contender, perhaps St. Louis too. I would put us in that category.
We *are* going to have cap issues, let's hope we look like an elite team when we do.