- Feb 17, 2013
- 2,245
- 3,036
She's 90. What makes you think she wants to travel to midtown Manhattan?classy? guy made over a million bucks as a player... no free tickets?
She's 90. What makes you think she wants to travel to midtown Manhattan?classy? guy made over a million bucks as a player... no free tickets?
Ah... well, I will point out that I said "eventually, if not right away, the defense looks like this..."
Lindgren probably stays in that top 4 for the immediate time being if Trouba was to be traded. So that is not an immediate swap-out.
The idea is that Miller-Fox and Jones-Schneider are the eventual long term top 4 pairings.
My conceptualization would, again, be that the eventual pairing long term is Miller-Fox and Jones-Schneider, but for next year, if I traded Trouba and a first for Detroit's first and took Lambert, it would probably be Miller-Fox and then Lindgren-Schneider.
The third pair would be highly similar to this year and we'd be rolling with Nemeth or another vet, and then a platoon of kids in Jones, Robertson and Nils rolling in and out. At the deadline you could add another vet to stabilize if needed.
This is a step back on D, but it's not a "giant," step back. The third pair with Nemeth or a vet and a combination of Jones, Robertson and Nils is probably RELATIVELY similar to our D this year with Nemeth/vet and Schneider.
It's the second pair that suffers. Lindgren-Schneider is probably worse than Miller-Trouba. But Miller-Fox is probably better than Lindgren-Fox right now, as Miller continues to ascend and frankly, so does Fox who is only 24 years old. And Lindgren probably grades out better against easier matchups as well.
It's a step back on D, but the trade off you are getting is a potential future 1C.
That's massive.
Massive.
And for the people who are on-board to win now - the cap savings from moving Trouba allow you to re-sign Vatrano, Motte, and Blais and you can ice a dominant fourth line. So defensive downgrade, but massive upgrade to your forward corps, both now and later.
And you still have another spare defender (either Lindgren, Nils, Jones, or Robertson) as trade bait.
It's not really a stretch to say your highly touted kids have to make NHL debuts at some point. These guys are getting into the line up next year one way or the other. The idea is that they are going to be good enough to actually be worth putting into your lineup.
I like Trouba, but the Girardi defense argument ain’t it. We aren’t trading Trouba because he has a NMC also management definitely loves the guy. It would make a lot of sense to move his $8M if we could and it would solve the cap issue for the rest of the team and allow us to keep the rest of the roster together.Trouba is a unicorn and not many in here seem to understand that. This guy is 2nd in the league in blocked shots and 8th in hits, all while putting up 37 points this year so far(and only 4 of those points were on the Powerplay, since he doesn't play on PP1). We can't talk about "filling shoes" with this guy - that's an extremely unfair ask of any of our young Dmen. Trouba is part of the very core of this team, without a doubt.
According to HFNYR, everyone wants to be in NY.She's 90. What makes you think she wants to travel to midtown Manhattan?
Motte missed the start of this season with off-season neck surgery. He had a bulging disk in his neck. Arthur Staple mentioned on his podcast that Motte has had neck fusion surgery before. If Motte re-injured his neck, that would be very bad for him.
Horny NCAA players, sureAccording to HFNYR, everyone wants to be in NY.
Trouba is a super important player for this team the problem is he makes wayyy to much money. Not his fault though.Trouba is a unicorn and not many in here seem to understand that. This guy is 2nd in the league in blocked shots and 8th in hits, all while putting up 37 points this year so far(and only 4 of those points were on the Powerplay, since he doesn't play on PP1). We can't talk about "filling shoes" with this guy - that's an extremely unfair ask of any of our young Dmen. Trouba is part of the very core of this team, without a doubt.
no but 20-something millionaire athletes sure doAccording to HFNYR, everyone wants to be in NY.
He's been taken off PP2 as well
was debating whether or not to mention that, but it really bad stigma of which the Rangers have not been guilty for almost 20 years.no but 20-something millionaire athletes sure do
I was sleeping on the subway when Ron Duguay approached, clipped a lock of his hair, gave it to me and said his hair will grant me one wish only. Even though I was destitute, I wished for Ron Low’s dismissal and it was granted. But then we got Trottier and knew that I wasted my wish. True storyJohn Tortorella once packed up his leftovers and bone from his NY strip steak and brought it to the alley way with homeless vagrants and gave it to me and my dog, @EdJovanovski.
If you recently, Gallant's recent comments about him and his usage of Copp make it less likely he will be second line center, though everyone thinks that that. My guess is that it is not used at center before the season ends, he'll remain in a supporting role on the same line but with a more skilled center. Just because he was capable of that in Winnipeg (the team that drafted him, right?). Doesn't mean he's necessarily going to play center somewhere else... If he's not unseated Strome by now, for even a shift (not talking faceoffs), I doubt they'd purposely downgrade (steeply IMO) in pure stick skill.
I think out for the regular season is probably a given at this point, but not sure about playoffs.Motte is done for the year, idk why they don’t just come out and say it. They talked around Rooney and Kakko’s injury and they were out like a third of the year
I don’t think its going to be discrete, and when he does Cooley/Wright isnt going to be the level of returnCool. We have done very little to help him succeed.
We're setting it up to a point where he may discreetly ask for a trade.
Laffy to MTL for Wright or Cooley. Anything short of a Cooley/Wright return is a fat no.
Also, sitting Laf isn't a bad thing. He looks like a young player that has played a lot of tough games. He could use some rest here and there. He has had a better season this year then last. More points (More games, I know) and though people shit on it, a better plus-minus despite the significant increase in games played. He is a smarter and more reliable player then he was and is more involved in the play throughout this year then he was last year. He still needs to improve and engage more cause he has to realize that the NHL is too good and the game does not "come to you" so to speak. You gotta go get it. I doubt he asks for a trade. At least, not for a few years.
chemistry be damned, I'm just talking about slight positional changes-- players kind of do that naturally. If you listen to Gallant's last pregame, he indirectly says Copp isn't really a top six player... Panarin is accustomed to the right wing being the workhorse and the center his back and forth guy. So it depends on what kind of chemistry you want to play with, in the off-season I guess. Because those days are nearing the end anyway. I still think they should re-sign Copp over Strome, just maybe not in that roll. ItI think it's more that while Strome is here, they're not gonna mess with the Panarin-Stome chemistry
Next year is another matter. If Strome is gone but Copp is re-signed, then I'd bet he gets a long look as Panarin's C.
As for Laf...I dunno, I know the focus is on winning this season but I've said a lot, they need to find a way to get him into an important position in the lineup. You can't keep pushing a high draft pick down the lineup because you have a veteran team trying to win, they have to find a way to develop into that top six forward they "need"