Thirty One
Safe is safe.
- Dec 28, 2003
- 28,981
- 24,357
Excuse me, some of the brightest minds on this forum are from that area.There must be copious amounts of strong pungent fumes in the Vancouver area afflicting the minds of the locals.
Excuse me, some of the brightest minds on this forum are from that area.There must be copious amounts of strong pungent fumes in the Vancouver area afflicting the minds of the locals.
Excuse me, some of the brightest minds on this forum are from that area.
I tend to agree.
NYR should be looking to move not only for a better center, but a younger one.
Pettersson is a guy I'd pay a megapackage to get here. That's one trade I'd have K'Andre Miller available in.
Yeah, I'm not sure I buy this thirst some of my fellow board members think NYR management has for JT, but he's a real good player these days. The COST is the issue. plus the fact that whatever we trade for him, you can basically add Ryan Strome as well. And then come the end of NEXT year we have ZERO to show for it. I certainly don't see him bringing a Cup. So it's basically, Krav, Nils, 2022 1st, and Strome for Miller for 18 months, and then ZERO, with in all likelihood no Cup to show for it.
It just seems like really bad asset management to ME.
Thanks, I’ll check it out.In the interviews after firing Gorton, Dolan himself said he expected the Rangers to be aggressive when star players become available.
1000% agree.If the offer to Buffalo for Eichel included Nils, Krav, and a first, plus maybe more, and all available information seems to indicate that it very likely was a package of that or similar, then we should absolutely not be putting that same package together for a far inferior player with no term.
Yeah. That works if we want to pay that price. My point was that there won't be a lot of competition/bidding for whomever Vegas is cutting for cost reasons, because most of the other suitors would need to send cap BACK to Vegas to fit the contracts Vegas wants to cut and Vegas can't accept any back for the exact reasons they are selling in the first place. Hahaha.Send them a second and a third rounder for Smith and keep Gauthier . He is worth keeping even if we spot him as the extra forward next season at a cheap deal . Keep Reaves from playing so many games and Gauthier still has that thing called potential/speed /size ....he draws penalties...and is fast...we need fast on this team.
Well said.Lundkvist, Chytil, Kravtsov, and a first brings back an Eichel-level player, even one who DOESN'T want out. Holy hell, Eichel just went to Vegas for Krebs, Tuch, and a first. You are upping the ante by placing a FOURTH prime asset on the table.
If that's our ammo and the return is 18 months of JT Miller it's a horrendous trade for us. Even if we only expend 3 assets.
Just include the fourth asset and then get a star.
This isn't hard. There is precedent for it over, and over, and over.
JT Miller isn't a needle mover. Jack Eichel is.
Wait for the next Eichel.
Our window isn't closing this year. We don't have to spend all our best assets. Buy low, get Reilly Smith, fine.
Save Nils/Krav/Chytil to spend on a true elite player.
12 months ago I had Kravtsov and Lundkvist firmly contributing this year and beyond. Funny how things can shake out.
I just keep coming back to the fact that Strome, at around $5.25-5.5m on a long term deal (6 years) is pretty much the best choice for now. It kicks the can down the road and the contract is one that can be traded if it is structured properly.
I think he might knock off Strome, but I also kinda like having the idea of someone to take charge of PP2.I have no problem trading Krav or Nils for Miller really. Krav is basically a magic bean for other teams at this point and as much as some people don't want to hear it, Nils is nothing special.
Miller isn't a rental so there would have to be something going back that you don't want to give up. I don't know that JT is THE piece but I do know that he would fill several needs while acknowledging that he wouldn't be as productive here since he isn't knocking anyone off of the top PP (maybe Strome, but even then it wouldn't be in JT's normal role.)
JT would be a great piece for us IF our currently leadership group hits a high gear right out of the gate coming out the break (except for Kreider, he probably CAN'T do any more than he has done so far). Someone wise here posted a while back that most star rentals do jack, but instead complimentary pieces are the best bet. Miller as a compliment rather than to fix a problem? Sign me up. But I am not sure the team is there yet this year for a move like that.I have no problem trading Krav or Nils for Miller really. Krav is basically a magic bean for other teams at this point and as much as some people don't want to hear it, Nils is nothing special.
Miller isn't a rental so there would have to be something going back that you don't want to give up. I don't know that JT is THE piece but I do know that he would fill several needs while acknowledging that he wouldn't be as productive here since he isn't knocking anyone off of the top PP (maybe Strome, but even then it wouldn't be in JT's normal role.)
I wouldn't be mad but it seems kind of short sighted to pay that price for 1.5 years of Miller. Rather spend on a player with more term i.e. Rick Nash, Gaborik, etcAgain I believe it will be Miller for a first Lundkvist and maybe Robertson or a second in 2023
Again I believe it will be Miller for a first Lundkvist and maybe Robertson or a second in 2023