Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XXXIII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think Center is a position of need exactly. Just have to find the right players there, not the best. Strome is a perfect example: he was not 'a legit 2C' when we acquired him for all of Ryan Spooner.
Her still is not a legit number 2 center. The last few games proved it. Not a good skater, easily knocked off the puck, stinks at face offs and still taking dumb penalties. He is also not a good finisher. Has had some really good chances the last few games and did not capitalize. On a team with only one legit center we could use a number 2. You want Strome at center put him on the 3rd line.
 
I always thought he was a dumb player, you don't have to agree....but that wasn't your argument. You made this about some Euro bias, which is what I called you out for.

Well either Drury has a problem with skill guys or he has a problem with Euro skill guys. Either way we're a worse offense this year than we were last year because of his bias.
 
Why would the Rangers want Paul? I’m legitimately curious. His point totals aren’t great and he plays a good amount of minutes. UFA after this season. He appears to be a 4th liner playing extra minutes.
 
There's other ways to open up some cap room. Getting rid of Reaves and replacing him with a league minimum contract, double retention on Kane, going cheap at 2nd line center. It will take some creativity but it's possible.
Reaves has a 1.75M cap hit. Replacing him with minimum contract isn’t saving us enough to justify to move. Double retention on Kane is going to cost a lot.

Just because something might be possible doesn’t mean it’s the right decision.
 
Not surprising that St Louis and Boston are the leaders for Lindholm.

Both were rumored to be in on Chychrun and both could conceivably extend Lindholm this summer.
 
Yeah, this one has gone so well, you want to keep it going for another five years. Had we kept some of those players we could’ve augmented them with younger players on the fly, Miller and Zucc would be top players on this team. And if I remember correctly you wanted to dump Krieder too. By the way, I still don’t believe “re-builds” work.
The Rangers are right there. A little more patience. Cap space is the biggest obstacle facing the Rangers.

I didn't want the Rangers to re-sign Kreider. That had to do with how players like Kreider age. Power forwards don't age well. James Neal. Jamie Benn. Max Pacioretty. Those are just a few examples. Kreider is younger than those players. Benn is an albatross for the Stars at $9.5M. Pacioretty is so beat up. He can't stay healthy. Hopefully. Kreider breaks Jagr's record for most goals scored this season. He is on the team for another two seasons. After that, all bets are off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leetch99 and Ola
The Rangers are right there. A little more patience. Cap space is the biggest obstacle facing the Rangers.

I didn't want the Rangers to re-sign Kreider. That had to do with how players like Kreider age. Power forwards don't age well. James Neal. Jamie Benn. Max Pacioretty. Those are just a few examples. Kreider is younger than those players. Benn is an albatross for the Stars at $9.5M. Pacioretty is so beat up. He can't stay healthy. Hopefully. Kreider breaks Jagr's record for most goals scored this season. He is on the team for another two seasons. After that, all bets are off.
The Rangers are right there because they brought in Panarin, lucked into a 4th round all star vezina candidate and their home grown rocket Richard candidate is having a career year. Additionally, we didn’t have to tank to win the draft either, which again, is another crap shoot. Bringing in proven players that can actually produce is better than draft picks which are just luck. Rebuilds that rely on draft picks don’t work unless you have a horseshoe up your ass.
 
Last edited:
I disagree with your 1st point, especially since Kreider-ZIbanejad-Lafreniere really haven't been all that good together and none of the 3 have really been producing much at 5v5. We could absolutely use an upgrade on that line. Maybe it's not Kane but someone. I agree more with your 2nd point, although I guess it depends what the complete deal would look like. If you can get Kane at 25% and it costs Kakko and then Chicago flips an asset to Arizona or whoever to eat another 50% it might be worth it in my eyes.

Well my point is I don't have enough faith in the coaches to see beyond reuniting Kane and Panarin on the same line. The team needs to give minutes to these kids if they expect them to develop into the elite options they can be. I don't think giving Gallant a guy like Kane is a wise move at all.

I don't think Kane at 25% is worth giving up on a talent like Kakko. I'm not saying this to you specifically but this all ties into the issues I had with signing Panarin in the first place. Once the team started turning things around the desire to stomp on the accelerator would trump the patience needed to let the team turn into a perennial contender. You go quickly from an organic growth to something that seems forced because there's something exciting to chase.
 
The Rangers are right there. A little more patience. Cap space is the biggest obstacle facing the Rangers.

I didn't want the Rangers to re-sign Kreider. That had to do with how players like Kreider age. Power forwards don't age well. James Neal. Jamie Benn. Max Pacioretty. Those are just a few examples. Kreider is younger than those players. Benn is an albatross for the Stars at $9.5M. Pacioretty is so beat up. He can't stay healthy. Hopefully. Kreider breaks Jagr's record for most goals scored this season. He is on the team for another two seasons. After that, all bets are off.
Kreider is not a power forward and if you knew anything about the player you would know he is one of the best skaters in the league and is in great physical shape. Guys like him will age very well and there is no reason he can't play at a high level for several more years. The guys you mention where never th etype player that Kreider is except maybe for Pacioretty who in recent times has been slowed by injury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NikC
Why would the Rangers want Paul? I’m legitimately curious. His point totals aren’t great and he plays a good amount of minutes. UFA after this season. He appears to be a 4th liner playing extra minutes.
Paul wants $3M AAV. Ottawa is at $2.85M. Those guys are so cheap. Ottawa has cap space. Paul wants to stay there. Ottawa doesn't attract many players if they have other options.
 
When the second half of the back to back is against an equally hard team that’s actually in your division?

It’s moronic.
The logic is that you look at it as 4 point up for grabs and your team has its best shot of getting 2 of those points in the first game when rest isn’t an issue.

Personally I hate it too, I miss the days of Hank playing both games so we didn’t have to worry about it. But I mean the logic is pretty straight forward, divisional opponent or not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad