Ghost of jas
Unsatisfied
Don't know. Calgary seems like they might want to shake things up and if they called me, that's who I'd be asking about.
Beyond that, I don't have much.
Buch for Lindholm? And do the Rangers move him back to center?
Don't know. Calgary seems like they might want to shake things up and if they called me, that's who I'd be asking about.
Beyond that, I don't have much.
Honestly I don't have a great feel for how good Nurse is/how he's viewed but he's a big LD who skates well etc and would probably solidify that left side quite a bit and those guys are sometimes overvalued. That said you can't ignore DeAngelo's points, and is Nurse just kind of Skjei 2.0?
I wonder if the team would take a shot on Kylington, he's kinda in that space between where he's too good for the AHL, but Calgary has LD depth where he isn't getting consistent minutes in the NHL
I remember one of our insiders saying they thought Kylington was part of the proposed package for a potential Hayes trade at the deadline
Really wondering if there is a deal to be had with Vegas. They have really bad cap issues. Would try to get Stastny and Martinez out of there. DeAngelo and 2020 Carolina 1st to headline a deal.
Buch for Lindholm? And do the Rangers move him back to center?
I think they would view him as a Center.
Then that's a deal that makes sense. Then you could move Strome to RW for the short term, until the Rangers view Kravtsov as being ready.
Martínez is very solid. Good stopgap while Miller learns the job. Also gets another cup winner in the locker room. That’s valuable. Also free money off the cap Summer 2021Seems like a bad idea to trade ADA for 2 rentals and Martinez isn't even good.
Posted this in another thread. But seriously, if this doesn't make you daydream and smile, you need to find another team.
View attachment 360504 View attachment 360505
Looks good but that #22 is cursed for us.Posted this in another thread. But seriously, if this doesn't make you daydream and smile, you need to find another team.
View attachment 360504 View attachment 360505
Looks good but that #22 is cursed for us.
If the deal was ADA for Nurse + 14th I would 100% take it. They'd be getting a very different type of d-man in Nurse but he's almost exactly what they need on the left side.
Didn't he wear 10 or 12 at one point?Time to reverse some long-standing issues:
Drafting first overall.
Taking a player from the Q in the first round
Home-grown superstars
Championship droughts
The number 22 (which I love)
I picked 22 because he's worn it internationally and 11 is out of the question.
I also think 91 would look sharp.
Didn't he wear 10 or 12 at one point?
I’m going to go out on a limb and say he isn’t getting 10 for the Rangers.Didn't he wear 10 or 12 at one point?
You're asking for a definitvie answer to one I cant give you. That does not mean it is not possible. My #1 target would be Cirelli and move down from there. If hes not available or will cost too much, on to the next. You even listed centers... Bonino or Bozak fit the bill. You even said it yourself, we need PK help. We need to win faceoffs.... things that make it tougher to play against us...
My definition of tough to play against does not = NHL Goon. Jesper Fast is the good example of 'TTPA'. Battle for the puck. Forecheck. Backcheck. Do all the things that are necessary to win. That's a mindset/attitude. You either have it or you dont. You can pretend to have it for a handful of games ( USA Buch ) but you will come back to the norm eventually... ( Regular Buch )
To simplify it... Are we capable of playing Playoff Hockey. When Torts' was here we were way too far in 1 direction. Now, we're way too far in the opposite direction. We need to approach the Goldilocks zone somewhere in the center.
Didn't he wear 10 or 12 at one point?
10 would be Sharp, however he probably doesn't make enough Bread to pry it away from its current occupant.
12 would be Keane.
Posted this in another thread. But seriously, if this doesn't make you daydream and smile, you need to find another team.
View attachment 360504 View attachment 360505