staal is not a buyout candidate this year...the cap hit is brutal and carries for too many years when we might need the space. next summer the buyout isn't that bad if we need to go that route
This is an odd thing to say, considering that Staal's buyout is not bad.
Comparing the two:
[TABLE="class: brtb_item_table"][TBODY][TR][TD][/TD]
[TD]Buyout in '19[/TD][TD]Buyout in '20[/TD][/TR]
[TR][TD]19/20[/TD][TD]$2.9M[/TD][TD]---[/TD][/TR]
[TR][TD]20/21[/TD][TD]$3.7M[/TD][TD]$3,566,667[/TD][/TR]
[TR][TD]21/22[/TD][TD]$1.2M[/TD][TD]$1,066,667[/TD][/TR]
[TR][TD]22/23[/TD][TD]$1.2M[/TD][TD]---[/TD][/TR][/TBODY][/TABLE]
So, the $2.9M in cap hit in 19/20 doesn't matter even if you bring in Panarin and give two of ADA/Buch/Pionk/Lemieux/Claesson long term deals and give the others QO's or bridges, you'll still have a few million left in space. The $1.2M in 22/23 won't matter either even with Kakko/Kravstov/Zibanejad get mega deals and Panarin is still on the roster; will still have a few million in space. The difference between cap hits in 20/21 and 21/22 is negligible at best.
And then someone will say "But Smith has the better buyout cap hit numbers!" Yes, this is true, in a vacuum they are easier on the eye.
However, look at it this way: What does it look like with buying out one and then adding that to the others non-buyout cap hit?
[TABLE="class: brtb_item_table"][TBODY][TR][TD][/TD]
[TD]Staal AAV/Smith Buyout[/TD][TD]Staal buyout/Smith AAV[/TD][/TR]
[TR][TD]19/20[/TD][TD]$6.67M[/TD][TD]$7.25M[/TD][/TR]
[TR][TD]20/21[/TD][TD]$8.845M[/TD][TD]$8.05M[/TD][/TR][/TBODY][/TABLE]
And then in 21/22 and 22/23, since both buyout numbers are equivalent ($1.145M to $1.2M), and the other will be off the roster, it's a wash. Smith is also just a better player than Staal in general, so it's pretty much more practical to buyout Staal.
The cap hit is nowhere near "brutal"