Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XLI

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Panarin made so many selfish and lazy plays last night.

On the first Bruins goal, Backes strips Panarin of the puck in the Columbus offensive zone and Bruins immediately went on the rush. Panarin skates with no effort into his own zone. The puck goes to Krejci. Panarin is right next to him. Panarin should have checked Krejci and wouldn't have scored but Panarin was too lazy to back check at the beginning of the sequence.

On the Bruins GWG, Panarin loses the puck again the offensive zone. Get the puck in deep. The Bruins immediately transition and go the other way. The puck goes to Pastrnak. Panarin is again a few strides behind Pastrnak. Lazy stick check by Panarin. Game over.



Panarin is a disaster waiting to happen.

The Rangers don't need him. The Rangers have enough quality winger options in Kravstov and Kakko. They say a team needs two elite 1st line wingers to win a championship. The Rangers have them with Kravstov and Kakko.

Panarin is a stupid idea.

Last night was the first game in the series I didn’t see. Other than one mistake, the radio announcers (NHL feed) were raving about Panarin.

Which correlates with what I saw in the first four games of the series. After Seth Jones, BJ’s best player.

Panarin is not a stupid idea.
 
You guys realize that signing a top UFA won’t be possible once Kakko and Kravtsov are off their ELCs, right? That’s the point of getting these 3-4 years out of a guy like Panarin while they’re all still cost controlled.

Also if the team clearly isn’t ready, Panarin allows you to trade Kreider for assets without completely tearing it all down and becoming Edmonton.
 
Last night was the first game in the series I didn’t see. Other than one mistake, the radio announcers (NHL feed) were raving about Panarin.

Which correlates with what I saw in the first four games of the series. After Seth Jones, BJ’s best player.

Panarin is not a stupid idea.
No dude. One mediocre game that RB saw >>>>>>>>>> the past few seasons where he's been great with and without elite players on his line (CHI and CBJ respectively).

Get on the same page.
 
You guys realize that signing a top UFA won’t be possible once Kakko and Kravtsov are off their ELCs, right? That’s the point of getting these 3-4 years out of a guy like Panarin while they’re all still cost controlled.

Also if the team clearly isn’t ready, Panarin allows you to trade Kreider for assets without completely tearing it all down and becoming Edmonton.

Why wouldn't it be?

Even if that were the case, there are other ways to add players.
 
If I am the player, Kreider’s comparable is Evander Kane 7 x $7MM. If I am the team it is JVR 5 X $7 MM. you can almost see where this is going.

There are teams that will line up for that deal, especially considering that they get a bonus year this year at $4.6MM.

I’m not sure what is going to happen but the prospect of that contract, which is the market rate, has to have them listening.
 
If I am the player, Kreider’s comparable is Evander Kane 7 x $7MM. If I am the team it is JVR 5 X $7 MM. you can almost see where this is going.

There are teams that will line up for that deal, especially considering that they get a bonus year this year at $4.6MM.

I’m not sure what is going to happen but the prospect of that contract, which is the market rate, has to have them listening.
Agree with the comps, but you've got to figure they add a $0.5-1.0MM-per-year bump for lack of baggage and a rising salary cap, no?
 
You guys realize that signing a top UFA won’t be possible once Kakko and Kravtsov are off their ELCs, right? That’s the point of getting these 3-4 years out of a guy like Panarin while they’re all still cost controlled.

Also if the team clearly isn’t ready, Panarin allows you to trade Kreider for assets without completely tearing it all down and becoming Edmonton.
We also realize that other than Hossa and Chara, no cup winner had a top free agent. I'm not buying the argument that if we don't act now we will miss the train because it's not a path we should take regardless.

As to the second point, it's a rationale I can concede in theory. The concern I have is how likely is a trade, really? We said the same thing last summer with Zuccarello. We thought there was a good chance he would go. I didn't hear a single rumor on him ultimately. I'm sure gorton could find a take it or leave it trade to clear a spot for Panarin. But there is no guarentee you sign him. That could be another problem if he lands elsewhere. And that is out of character for Gorton to make impulsive trades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jas and Avery16
Last night was the first game in the series I didn’t see. Other than one mistake, the radio announcers (NHL feed) were raving about Panarin.

Which correlates with what I saw in the first four games of the series. After Seth Jones, BJ’s best player.

Panarin is not a stupid idea.

Panarin being a really good player has nothing to do with whether or not its a stupid idea for the current status of this team. Stupid might be a bit of a rude way of stating their opinion, but it's not an obvious good idea and there is a strong argument (one I agree with) for why it would be a bad idea for our team today.

There is more to signing a player than just saying 'he's really good,' especially in a league with a cap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jas
Why wouldn't it be?

Even if that were the case, there are other ways to add players.

Because then you are playing everyone top dollar at the same time. It’s the Toronto problem with Matthews, Marner and Tavares - which wouldn’t be as much of a problem if they hypothetically could have signed Tavares 2 years prior for $9 million instead of $11 million.
 
Why wouldn't it be?

Even if that were the case, there are other ways to add players.
It will eventually become a TB/WPG/TOR scenario. The purpose of the cap.

I don't think we will have many big contracts out of their ELC, that's why I like Panarin this year. It lines up perfectly for when the cap space will be truly needed, 6-7 years from now. While helping us transition to that
 
What I posted on the jets board re: Trouba

"
Not here to cause a stir or offer commentary on some of these trade proposals, just to offer some perspective on the state of the NYR cupboard in case any of you guys are interested.

When we traded McDonagh, we basically ended up with a late 1st (28th overall), late 2nd (~60th overall), Brett Howden (a recent late 1st who had a good d+1 season), Libor Hajek (a recent middle 2nd who had an okay d+1 season). Essentially two end of round 1sts (28-31 overall) and 2 late 2nds (45-60 overall). Namestnikov and Miller weren't a wash, Miller was definitely the more valuable piece there, so I would correspondingly likely drop the least valuable piece in the trade, the late 2nd. The other thing to remember is that McDonagh was not traded in the summer, he was traded at the deadline - so the team acquiring him got at least 2 playoff runs with him. In which case, think about what you would get for Trouba now and think about what you would get at the deadline. The sum of those two values for McDonagh ended up being 2 late 1sts and 1 middle 2nd. We would not have gotten as much if we traded him during the summer.

One could of course argue Trouba is more valuable because he's younger, but that's neither here nor there. Just offering some perspective on how McDonagh was valued at - you can take that and extrapolate Trouba how you wish from there.

Here are the rough values, player comparables & likelihood of being traded for the Rangers' cupboard.

Lias Andersson - Recent high 1st round pick (7th overall). Great d+1 season (> .5 ppg in the SHL at 18), disappointing d+2 season. Ceiling would be a poor man's Landeskog, maybe Callahan. I don't think the Rangers would be unwilling to move him if push came to shove.
Filip Chytil - Recent middle 1st round pick (21st overall). Stellar d+1 season (3/4 ppg in the AHL at 18) , okay d+2 season. Ceiling is 20-45 center, target would be 15-35 center. Very speedy & tall, might end up being a winger. Probably not off the table, but less likely to be moved than Andersson if push came to shove.
K'Andre Miller - Recent middle 1st round pick (22nd overall). Stellar d+1 season (led his college team by far in points as a dman, nearly PPG). The only piece in the Rangers cupboard who has a chance of being a #1 and thus really unlikely to be moved.
Nils Lundkvist - Recent late 1st round pick (28th overall). Really good d+1 season. Possession defenseman, great in the neutral zone. Comparable of Anton Stralman. Ceiling is a #2, likely to be a strong middle pairing dman. Not off the table in a trade.
Vitaly Kravtsov - Recent early 1st round pick (9th overall). Stellar d+1 season (highest percentage of points as a % of his teams offense for a teen in the KHL - better than Tarasenko, Kuznetsov, etc). Ceiling is a #1 playmaking winger (say in the 60-75 point range). Really unlikely to be moved.
Libor Hajek - Mid-2nd round pick. Okay d+1, d+2 seasons, really good in the AHL in his d+3 and shone in his NHL callup. Ceiling is a minute eating dman who does not carry much offense - a #2. Pretty good shot of being a strong middle pairing dman. Not off the table in a trade.
Neal Pionk - Puts up a ton of points on the PP, but not the greatest defender. Ceiling is a #4 defender who can put in 40 points, floor is Raphael Diaz. Likely to be moved, not enough space on our blueline for him.
Anthony DeAngelo - lots of talk on him, moved a lot. This year was make or break for him and he shone. By far most improved dman. Ceiling at this point is Keith Yandle/Shattenkirk with better defense. Pretty unlikely to be moved. Still has some attitude issues, but has worked through most of them.
Brett Howden - Late 1st round pick. Strong, speedy pivot with high hockey IQ and work ethic. Upper ceiling is a #2 centerman (55 points), likely tops out as a strong #3 centerman (40-45 points) who always gives it his all. My guess is the Rangers really like him and see a future alternate captain, but based on just output, probably not unmoveable.

In terms of established NHL players, Namestnikov, Strome, Vesey, Kreider & Shattenkirk are all likely on the block. The Rangers would retain on Kreider or Shattenkirk to increase their value more. I would expect they hope for a pick around 15-20 for Kreider with retention. Someone like Zibanejad who is by far our best player currently, is signed to a super cheap contract and is quite young is just not on the table for anyone.

If you take McDonagh's value at the deadline as 2 late 1sts and 1 middle 2nd, a comparable trade for Trouba would be along the lines of Dallas' 1st (28-30 overall assuming they make the WCF), Nils Lundkvist (recent late 1st who has done well), and then Tampa's 2nd. That's quite a haul and doesn't account for the fact that this is in the offseason and not the trade deadline (thus you have to subtract value). My guess is that the Rangers would want to include Neal Pionk in the trade given the too-many-bodies problem on our current blueline.

I think if the Rangers wanted to be aggressive (which they've shown they can be as with the Fox trade) and really, really like Trouba, they would be willing to pay. Dallas' 1st + Pionk + one of Hajek, Lundkvist, Andersson, Howden (the strong, but moveable prospects) is what you might see. Personally, I wouldn't do that because I don't think the timing is right, but I could see a situation where the Rangers might think it is because they think getting the #2 accelerates the rebuild.

We've sold off a lot of players recently so if there's one thing I think we've all learned, it's that established NHL players don't get a teams' #1, #2 or #3 prospects. They get their #4 or #5 and whatever pick is available. If getting someone like Kravstov or Miller is a deal breaker, then there's probably no deal to be made.
"

If we are expecting ~#15 for Kreider, I think something like Dallas' 1st, Lundkvist + Pionk is what Trouba would command. I'm not sure I want to pay it.
 
Stupid might be a bit of a rude way of stating their opinion, but it's not an obvious good idea and there is a strong argument (one I agree with) for why it would be a bad idea for our team today.

Which is also an opinion, that, in your opinion has a "strong argument" for it.

I'd wager that those making the opinion that signing Panarin is a good idea also believe they have a "strong argument" for it.
 
The trade for Adam Fox that includes an encumbered 2020 second-rounder (a third will become a second if the Harvard product plays 30 NHL games this season) takes the Rangers out of the offer-sheet game for any compensation that includes a No. 2 for 2020.
In other words, no Mitch Marner or Brayden Point on Broadway … unless you’re sacrificing four first-rounders.
Which potential new president John Davidson is not.

https://nypost.com/2019/05/05/who-are-the-hall-of-famers-in-this-seasons-nhl-playoffs/
 
  • Like
Reactions: pld459666
If Dallas wins the cup this year, are they less likely to re-sign Zucc?
 
We also realize that other than Hossa and Chara, no cup winner had a top free agent. I'm not buying the argument that if we don't act now we will miss the train because it's not a path we should take regardless.

As to the second point, it's a rationale I can concede in theory. The concern I have is how likely is a trade, really? We said the same thing last summer with Zuccarello. We thought there was a good chance he would go. I didn't hear a single rumor on him ultimately. I'm sure gorton could find a take it or leave it trade to clear a spot for Panarin. But there is no guarentee you sign him. That could be another problem if he lands elsewhere. And that is out of character for Gorton to make impulsive trades.
You realize if Boston wins again that literally half of the cups over the last decade right?
 
We also realize that other than Hossa and Chara, no cup winner had a top free agent. I'm not buying the argument that if we don't act now we will miss the train because it's not a path we should take regardless.

Are you talking as in signed over the summer and won the Cup the following year or what? Trade deadline UFA's?
 
Oh I get it.

You wanna pay Panarin 11% of the cap now so you can stagger our albatross contracts... and he'll be 9% when we are ready to truly compete. Copy.

Panarin will have an albatross contract....sure. If you believe that, there’s nothing to discuss.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad