Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,075
- 40,935
I'm game to add bad contracts provided they only last for next season.
No to Lucic, yes to Callahan/Marleau
I would take on Marleau if they want to give us Kapanen
I'm game to add bad contracts provided they only last for next season.
No to Lucic, yes to Callahan/Marleau
Since offer sheets are being brought back up, here is the current status of what offer sheets the Rangers can do:
![]()
So, the no compensation tier ($0-$1.339M), one 2nd round pick ($2.029M-$4.059M), or four 1st round picks ($10.148M+)
2021 2nd might count as being the next eligible pick. Waiting to see if CF will respond.I don't even think they can do the $2.029M - $4.059M one because the 2nd round pick is also tied up in the Fox trade.
I think there is a bit of a different meaning to what is said:
“Teams up against the ceiling will need them as a potential partner, and the Rangers will want good players to ease your pain.”
Could just as well read that Gorton will take on term and is willing to pay for it with futures or young cheap players, but only if the player behind the term is good enough. Wouldn’t he state that Gorton will want a lot of assets, probably picks, if he were to take on real negative value contracts? Not ‘good players’?
For teams right up against the cap, what matters is performance/spent dollar. Look at someone like Ryan Johansen, what is he worth? 8m per for 6 more years. He isn’t much more than a 60 pts center.
I just think the market for someone like that is much quieter than we can imagine. It’s a heck of a commitment to take on for a team. Not many could afford him under their cap, we would maybe have a handful of teams with interest and cap space. Sure, he would get a return for Nashville, but I can’t see a team like say Carolina loading up with an offer around Necas and multiple 1sts or Detroit offering Zadina plus a 1st or two, Colorado putting the Ottawa pick in play and then adding to it. Any team that becomes good will have cap issues. A contract like that at 8m pet for 6 more years is a big commitment in itself.
If Gorton is willing to throw weight around at that market — I could definitely see him getting some action.
There were a lot of moves from 1998-2001Oh absolutely, I’d much rather they threaten then give up picks for these guys, but I like the fact that it’s being said regardless. More moves to come is always exciting.
“Cool.”There were a lot of moves from 1998-2001
Pretty sure when it's four first round picks it has to be 4 in 5 years, but if it's one pick it needs to be the next one.2021 2nd might count as being the next eligible pick. Waiting to see if CF will respond.
Yeah, in my mind, that scenario would have him signing with Toronto after the buy-out.The Marleau thing will be interesting. He moved his whole family up to Toronto and it's hard to see him waiving to be apart from them for an entire season, equally difficult to see him moving them all to another city as well, even if it's back to California. Maybe he agrees to a buy out and signs with a team like Pittsburgh where there are relatively short flights direct to Toronto or something like that.
Yeah, in my mind, that scenario would have him signing with Toronto after the buy-out.
I get that, but I think a team would have to be pretty dumb if the NHL is able to prove that they agreed on the new contract before the trade.The NHL investigated the Avs and Caps after they did that with Orpik last summer. There's no rule saying a team can't do it, but there are some rumors that the NHL let GM's know that they'll come down hard if they can prove it was cap circumvention.
Based on that Friedman article, I ‘m still under the belief that Nylander and Trouba are more likely Gorton’s targets than Panarin.
I get that, but I think a team would have to be pretty dumb if the NHL is able to prove that they agreed on the new contract before the trade.
Winnipeg’s 1st and Pionk for Trouba.
Kreider to Arizona for their 1st and a conditional 1st that becomes a 2nd in 20’ unless Kreider does not resign in the desert. Arizona’s pick is at 14, there will be a good forward available at 14. Hughes, Kakko, Turcotte, Knight, Byram, Broberg, Soderstrom, Zegras, Boldy, Dach, Caufield, Podkolzin, York and Rees are 14 really good names and should go high. One of them will be available as well as the best of the rest so to speak.
Sign Curtis Lazar as a UFA.
Deal Vesey and Names for picks.
Make a Shatty deal work as soon as possible, and keep Fox in HFD until it can get done.
Trade for someone like Toffoli, good player and not the longest contract.
Kravy-Ziba-Bucb
Lemieux-Chytil-Kakko
Toffoli-Strome-Lazar
Gettinger-Boo-Fast
Staal-TDA
Skjei-Trouba
Hajak-Shatty/Fox
Move Strome and Toffoli at the deadline. Lias gets a called up. Starting in HFD would be great for him.
Should get a lottery pick again. Add another future core asset in the draft next season. Let’s say that we can get someone like Lucas Raymond:
Kravy-Ziba-Kakko
Raymond-Chytil-Buch
Lemieux-Lias-Lazar/Fast
KAndre-TDA
Skjei-Trouba
Hajak-Fox
With a ton of internal pressure from all the picks we have made besides those guys. All LDs. Keane and Lundkvist. We have some good forwards already in the system and a few more should join fairly soon.
Then it starts to look interesting for real for the coming 10 years.
Yeah, I'm waiting for CF to wake up and confirm my tweet of this scenario to them.Pretty sure when it's four first round picks it has to be 4 in 5 years, but if it's one pick it needs to be the next one.
I agree regarding Skjei & Trouba. As for the existing stable of RD, I actually think the question is which of Shatty/ADA/Pionk goes. Could be any one, two, or all three of them.I think Skjei is the centerpiece for a Trouba deal. I also wonder if Lundkvist becomes available with the trade for Fox.
We still have time though to add a 1-2 big guys in the next couple years. Keane maybe grows another inch. Lindgren plays nasty.Carlo is also a monster.
Feel like it would have to be a lot to do them a favor and being that he has to waive his NMC. So you need a team that has the cap space and he is willing to go to.I would be more than happy to help Toronto with their Marleau problem provided that:
1)Is Marleau on board with this?
2)Is the NHL ok with it?
3)What else do we get?
ADA had a great 2nd half... don’t know what he is yet (like Buch)The central argument behind those buyouts is that you’re just getting these players out of the way to allow the youth to grow. In some cases (Smith) the sooner the better. In others (Shattenkirk)... it’s looking like at some point he is going to beyond superfluous. You might even consider that point to be right now. If you have DeAngelo, Pionk and Fox potentially being able to fill the RD puck moving and PP roles, you really need to get someone who can kill penalties in there. Shattenkirk is just taking up roster space that can be better utilized elsewhere. And he can’t be assigned to Hartford.
I do think Staal will be here until the end, unless his game REALLY falls off a cliff.
There’s benefit to eliminating their presence.
Do not move Lundkvist. Do not do it.I think Skjei is the centerpiece for a Trouba deal. I also wonder if Lundkvist becomes available with the trade for Fox.
I’m more worried about possible NHL front office retribution honestly, so not sure I’d even be worth it.Feel like it would have to be a lot to do them a favor and being that he has to waive his NMC. So you need a team that has the cap space and he is willing to go to.
I think Skjei is the centerpiece for a Trouba deal. I also wonder if Lundkvist becomes available with the trade for Fox.
Based on that Friedman article, I ‘m still under the belief that Nylander and Trouba are more likely Gorton’s targets than Panarin.
The central argument behind those buyouts is that you’re just getting these players out of the way to allow the youth to grow. In some cases (Smith) the sooner the better. In others (Shattenkirk)... it’s looking like at some point he is going to beyond superfluous. You might even consider that point to be right now. If you have DeAngelo, Pionk and Fox potentially being able to fill the RD puck moving and PP roles, you really need to get someone who can kill penalties in there. Shattenkirk is just taking up roster space that can be better utilized elsewhere. And he can’t be assigned to Hartford.
I do think Staal will be here until the end, unless his game REALLY falls off a cliff.
There’s benefit to eliminating their presence.